New Paper: The Modeling History of Climatology
Independent British climate researcher, Derek Alker herein provides a fresh and readily-understandable re-analysis of the identifiable five-step history of climate modelling with his new paper, The Modelling History of Climatology. 
Alker guides the reader from the slide-rule and pencil era of Vilhelm Bjerknes (1904) to the computer age of Charney (1979) and Hansen (1988) and beyond. This welcome new research discredits the greenhouse gas ‘theory’ – the diseased heart of climate models – and refuted relentlessly by scientists at Principia Scientific International (PSI) since 2009.
But most crucially, Alker provides a most unorthodox conclusion from this study. He finds that:
“To the best of my knowledge I am the first to suggest that the atmosphere is a cold trap for liquid water at earth’s surface and that THAT changes everything (most notably surface heat capacity [the oceans] currently ignored by climatology) for the basis of current, and the future basis of climate science.”
The Modelling History of Climatology shows we have been living in a misguided era of carbon dioxide (CO2) demonization that began in earnest with Charney (1979). For over a generation an over-simplified steady state climate model with constant solar input has dominated academic reasoning. Charney et al’s ‘greenhouse science’ version of planet earth was fixed as a crude two parallel plane barren and inorganic model. Climate modelers chose this flawed mathematical solution absent key thermodynamic elements in denial of the reality of our wet, three-dimensional living and breathing organic planet.
Compounding the demonization of CO2 is the well-known history, ‘The Discovery of Global Warming’ provided by Spencer Weart (pictured). Alker suggest, “It is worth drawing a direct comparison to Spencer Weart’s version and asking the reader to decide which is the spun version, who is doing the spinning and why?” 
Was such crass incompetence also spiced with the fraud? “Climategate” (2009) revealed that vast swathes of climate data and scientific calculations entrusted into the safekeeping of government scientists has been withheld, lost or destroyed preventing independent analysis. In Britain climate modelers at the world-leading Climatic Research Unit (CRU), University of East Anglia narrowly evaded criminal prosecution thanks only to a delay by prosecutors in detecting wrongdoing.
Meanwhile, in Canadian courts former PSI chairman, Dr Tim Ball, is battling former UN IPCC’s lead climate modeler, Professor Andrew Weaver who withholds data key to what may be a wider academic conspiracy.
What has emerged is a stark battle between unprincipled ‘post-normal’ government scientists seeking to subvert the traditional scientific method of openness, verifiability and accountability enshrined since Sir Isaac Newton’s time.
The Modelling History of Climatology is currently subject to open peer review here at Principia Scientific International (PSI) and feedback is warmly welcomed (see below).
* An explanation of PSI’s PROM system of open peer review is found here or accessible in the drop-down menu at the head of the main page under ‘Support’ and then ‘How the PROM Process Works.’
Trackback from your site.