New Lancet Study: Cold Kills 85 Times More Than Heat-Related Deaths

In 2015, perhaps the most respected medical journal in the world; The Lancet, published the reults of a study they undertook of the number of deaths from heat and cold between 2000 and 2015.

They concluded there were 15 times as many deaths from cold as there are from heat.

Now, they have republished the results of that study, with another seven years data.

Their conclusion this time: there are a staggering 85 times as many deaths from cold as there are from heat.

The study shows that in England and Wales there were an average of 791 heat-related excess deaths and 60,753 cold-related excess deaths each year.

Adjusted as deaths per 100,000 person-years, the annual ratio is 1.57 heat-related deaths vs. 122.34 cold-related excess deaths throughout the 21st century. [bold, links added]

“Our analysis indicates that the excess in mortality attributable to cold was almost two orders of magnitude higher than the excess in mortality attributable to heat.”

Several other new studies report heavily skewed ratios for cold- vs. heat-related excess deaths in the modern climate.

Excess mortality due to cold temperatures was 32 times higher than for heat in Switzerland from 1969-2017.

Schrijver et al., 2022

“Total all-cause excess mortality associated with nonoptimal temperatures was 9.19 percent [95 percent confidence interval (CI): 7.72, 10.47], which translates to 274,578 (95 percent CI: 230,657, 312,761) temperature-related excess deaths in Switzerland between 1969 and 2017 (Table 2; Table S4).

Cold-related mortality represented a significantly larger fraction in comparison with heat, with 8.91 percent (95 percent CI: 7.46, 10.21) vs. 0.28 percent (95 percent CI: 0.18, 0.37).”

Excess mortality due to cold temperatures was 7.6 times higher than for heat in 326 Latin American cities from 2002 to 2015.

Kephart et al., 2022

“Climate change and urbanization are rapidly increasing human exposure to extreme ambient temperatures, yet few studies have examined temperature and mortality in Latin America.

We conducted a nonlinear, distributed-lag, longitudinal analysis of daily ambient temperatures and mortality among 326 Latin American cities between 2002 and 2015.

We observed 15,431,532 deaths among ≈2.9 billion person-years of risk.

The excess death fraction of total deaths was 0.67 percent (95 percent confidence interval (CI) 0.58–0.74 percent) for heat-related deaths and 5.09 percent (95 percent CI 4.64–5.47 percent) for cold-related deaths.”

Excess mortality due to cold temperatures was 6.8 times higher than for heat in a city in India (Pune) from 2004 to 2012.

Ingole et al., 2022

“We applied a time series regression model to derive temperature-mortality associations based on daily mean temperature and all-cause mortality records of Pune city [India] from year January 2004 to December 2012.

The analysis provides estimates of the total mortality burden attributable to ambient temperature. Overall, 6∙5 percent [95 percent CI 1.76–11∙43] of deaths registered in the observational period were attributed to non-optimal temperatures, cold effect was greater 5.72 percent [95 percent CI 0∙70–10∙06] than heat 0∙84 percent [0∙35–1∙34].”

Excess mortality due to cold temperatures was 42 times higher than for heat in China in 2019.

Liu et al., 2022

“We estimated that 593·9 (95 percent UI:498·8, 704·6) thousand deaths were attributable to non-optimal temperatures in China in 2019 (PAF=5·58 percent [4·93 percent, 6·28 percent]), with 580·8 (485·7, 690·1) thousand cold-related deaths and 13·9 (7·7, 23·2) thousand heat-related deaths.”

Excess mortality due to cold temperatures was 46 times higher than for heat in Mexico from 1998-2017.

Cohen and Dechezleprêtre, 2022 (full paper)

“We examine the impact of temperature on mortality in Mexico using daily data over the period 1998–2017 and find that 3.8 percent of deaths in Mexico are caused by suboptimal temperature (26,000 every year).

However, 92 percent of weather-related deaths are induced by cold (<12 degrees C) or mildly cold (12–20 degrees C) days and only 2 percent by outstandingly hot days (>32 degrees C). Furthermore, temperatures are twice as likely to kill people in the bottom half of the income distribution.”

Excess mortality due to cold temperatures was 12.8 times higher than for heat “across 612 cities within 39 countries over the period 1985–2019.”

Mistry et al., 2022

“Here, we perform a comprehensive assessment of temperature-related mortality risks using ground weather stations observations and state-of-the-art reanalysis data across 612 cities within 39 countries over the period 1985–2019. …

In general, across most countries, the estimates of the excess mortality are very similar, with a global-level excess of 0.53 percent (95 percent eCI 0.50–0.56) versus 0.49 percent (0.43–0.53) for heat, and 6.02 percent (5.80–6.18) versus 6.25 percent (6.05–6.41) for cold, from ground stations and ERA5-Land data, respectively (‘Global’ in Fig. 5 and Table S3).

These percentages correspond to 357,729 (95 percent eCI 335,138–376,498) versus 326,032 (288,069–357,247) for heat, and 4,030,793 (3,880,068–4,137,579) versus 4,186,014 (4,051,321–4,293,311) for cold.”

If there really is a concern for human health and extending life spans, there should be much more emphasis placed on reducing the costs of energy to heat homes, as well as minimizing exposure to cold temperatures.

Instead, the invariable focus is on the dangers of “climate change” or heat waves that put humanity at a tiny fraction of the risk that cold temperatures do.

Warmth saves lives. Cold kills.

This has been true throughout human history, and it is no less true today.

See more here: climatechangedispatch

Some bold emphasis added

Header image: The Guardian

Editor’s note: Not only does this disprove the alarmists claim that millions are dying from ‘climate change’ temperature increases, it also means with the energy poverty now being forced on many countries, we should expect this 85 times figure to increase significantly after this winter. 

Please Donate Below To Support Our Ongoing Work To Defend The Scientific Method

PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL, legally registered in the UK as a company incorporated for charitable purposes. Head Office: 27 Old Gloucester Street, London WC1N 3AX. 

Share via