New French Evidence: Homo Sapiens 10,000 Years Earlier In Europe?
It’s time to change the current known historic timeline when it comes to the arrival of us modern humans, or Homo sapiens, in Europe.
The timeline needs to be altered and pushed back 10,000 years at least as new evidence has come to light in a cave in France. The evidence of the earlier occupation by Homo sapiens in Europe was discovered in a Cave, the Mandrin Cave to be exact and this cave is located near Montelimar in the Rhone region of Southern France.
In this cave the archaeologists discovered the fossilized remains of Homo sapiens and their tools sandwiched between the fossilized remains and tools of Neanderthals.
So to recap, Neanderthals lived in Europe from approximately 400,000 years ago until 35,000 years ago, give or take a few thousand years on both ends, we have to go off of the fossil record and as I’ve stated numerous times now, the fossil record can’t give us exact dates because conditions need to be perfect for specimen to become fossilized and able for us to date.
So up until this new information, it was always believed that Homo sapiens entered Europe approximately 45,000 years ago and that these two species or lineages lived together for some 5,000 or 10,000 years.
Which is why there are people who believe that the Neanderthals went extinct because of Homo sapiens, that Homo sapiens were the root cause of neanderthals disappearing.
Some people think that Homo sapiens murdered Neanderthals and drove them to extinction, others believe that Homo sapiens were able to procreate much faster and therefore out bred Neanderthals, maybe even interbred a lot and thus Neanderthals were dissolved into the Homo sapiens.
Of course none of these theories can be proven and this is not the subject of today’s video, but I did want to mention them because instead of these two species living together in the same area for no more than 10,000 years it is now clear that they were living in the same area for at least 15,000 to 20,000 years.
This as you can imagine makes the previously mentioned theories a lot less likely, having co-existed for such a long time shows that the arrival of Homo sapiens did not push the Neanderthals to extinction and that there is a different reason as to why they disappeared.
Header image: Research Outreach
Please Donate Below To Support Our Ongoing Work To Defend The Scientific Method
PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL, legally registered in the UK as a company 
incorporated for charitable purposes. Head Office: 27 Old Gloucester Street, London WC1N 3AX.
Trackback from your site.
MarkTapley
| #
This chatterbox paleontologist in her 5 min. video that lasts over 14 minutes makes the usual series of suppositions in an attempt to support their pre fabricated storyline. All of the mineral dating systems are known to be wildly inaccurate. She states that these tooth remains were all found in caves but then states that the different ages of the remains were verified by the burned deposits of walls and roof material. Whats the point of using a cave if you still have to build a shelter with walls? I think it is most likely that the cave was a long term dwelling site and what has been found are likely the remains of lunch time. We know many of those ancient “peaceful” American Indians of the southwest were cannibals whose culinary favorite were members of other tribes.
There always has to be either a meteorite or a volcano to help out the narrative as is used in this cave man story time. She speculates on why the subhuman Neanderthals disappeared but does not go into detail. From what I have read it is claimed that the Neanderthals had 99.7% of the DNA as the other humans. That indicates I think that these were just a different group of people who had experienced too much interbreeding within too small of a gene pool. This is well known to cause higher than normal mutations and epigenetic problems.
Reply
John Alexander
| #
I agree Mark.
Darwinism is like the lie of virology. Manipulated theory to suit a narrative.
GOD the Almighty creator is too magnificent and powerful for puny humans to understand.
It is also too difficult for many to accept that there is a creator. They question this at their peril.
Reply
Mark Tapley
| #
Hello Alexander:
And as you say their narrative has to be propped up more and more all the time. In the British aristocrat Darwin’s day, many viewed the intricately complex biological world in simple terms. If an animal needed to adapt to a marine environment or go from water to land it could. Or even grow wings and fly. This is all simplistic nonsense not far removed from the Hindu idea thousands of years earlier (the first Evolution theory)) of reincarnation from a jack ass to a baboon. Neither group knew anything about genetics or DNA,. After encountering the problem with the DNA (if the building material is not there it’s not going to happen) the evolutionists hoped to salvage their sinking ship with the hope of mutations. This has only led to another dead end as all mutations involve a loss of genetic material to effect change. Not a viable way of creating a new “kind” as Darwin proposed. Only recently, scientists have found what is the most critical component in all organisms that drive another nail in the evolutionary coffin. We now know that all organisms must have coded information, input from the start, similar to a computer program. Information of course cannot come from inanimate objects but only from an intelligent source.
Reply
lloyd
| #
So you do not believe in Evolution? Where are the fossils from? And you don’t think the scientists took into account interbreeding?
Reply