‘Net Zero’ could cost every UK Household £300,000 by 2050

Net Zero Watch has published a new study that encompasses the first empirically based estimate of the costs of ‘Net Zero’, and the first cost-benefit analysis

Official estimates have been criticised as hugely over-optimistic and for failing to present a formal cost-benefit analysis.

The study is the first to consider the full variability of the weather and its effects on both supply and demand for energy, and finds that much larger capacities of wind solar and energy storage will be required to deliver ‘Net Zero’ than suggested in any previous ‘Net Zero’ cost estimate.

It is also the first to base its cost figures, where possible, on empirical data. Previous estimates have assumed that a ‘renewables’ cost revolution has already taken place, a position that is refuted by the accounts of wind and solar farms.

The study takes in different scenarios of how technologies and their costs might develop as we head to ‘Net Zero’, as well as a scenario in which we abandon ‘renewables’ and return to ‘fossil fuels’.

Each also incorporates estimates of the ‘harms’ caused by any remaining carbon dioxide emissions – the so-called social cost of ‘carbon’ – to each scenario, so that the optimal approach can be identified.

In all cases, the cost-optimal approach is to return to ‘fossil fuels’, even once global warming ‘harms’ are taken into account. (You have to wonder what ‘harms’ are being referred to – Ed)

With current technology, the spend to 2050 would be nearly £10 trillion pounds, amounting to over £300,000 per household.

This equates to every household having to pay an additional £11,500 on top of current energy bills every year from now until 2050.

In the most optimistic scenario – in which ‘Net Zero’ technologies are assumed to become very cheap and very efficient compared to today, ‘fossil fuel’ prices are assumed to rise steadily, and a high cost is assumed for each tonne of emissions – the costs are still double the benefits.

In this scenario, the UK still needs to pay out £7 trillion, or £250,000 per household.

Net Zero Watch director Andrew Montford, the author of the report, said:

These figures are horrifying, but should still be seen as conservative, because the study makes no attempt to find costs for hard-to-decarbonise sectors, such as aviation and shipping. It’s clear that the UK is on the road to economic ruin.”

In his foreword to the study, Lord Mackinlay said:

Britain’s political consensus, it seems, is to tax CO2 emissions at a higher rate than the damage they do and then spend trillions more subsidising technologies that the public would not choose without compulsion.

This cannot be sustainable.”

The report can be downloaded here.

See more here netzerowatch.com

Bold emphasis added

Header image: The Irish Times

Please Donate Below To Support Our Ongoing Work To Defend The Scientific Method

PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL, legally registered in the UK as a company incorporated for charitable purposes. Head Office: 27 Old Gloucester Street, London WC1N 3AX. 

Trackback from your site.

Comments (1)

  • Avatar

    VOWG

    |

    There will never be any such thing as net zero. The zero is what is between the ears of idiots who believe CO2 is a climate driver. It is not.

    Reply

Leave a comment

Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment.
Share via