Naughty Pfizer’s Violations
No that’s not the title of a post-Covid Adult Movie. It is however a very revealing and eye-opening expose of Pfizer’s dirty doings
Violation Tracker Parent Company Summary
Parent Company Name: Pfizer
Ownership Structure: publicly traded (ticker symbol PFE)Headquartered in: New York
Major Industry: pharmaceuticals
Specific Industry: pharmaceuticals
Penalty total since 2000: $10,193,896,333
Number of records: 75
| Top 5 Offense Groups (Groups Defined) | Penalty Total | Number of Records |
|---|---|---|
| safety-related offenses | $5,637,014,255 | 15 |
| healthcare-related offenses | $3,373,675,000 | 10 |
| government-contracting-related offenses | $1,109,688,435 | 19 |
| competition-related offenses | $63,466,568 | 6 |
| environment-related offenses | $4,571,885 | 19 |
| Top 5 Primary Offense Types | Penalty Total | Number of Records |
|---|---|---|
| drug or medical equipment safety violation | $5,636,840,000 | 9 |
| off-label or unapproved promotion of medical products | $3,373,675,000 | 10 |
| False Claims Act and related | $1,109,688,435 | 19 |
| Foreign Corrupt Practices Act | $60,216,568 | 3 |
| environmental violation | $4,571,885 | 19 |
Holy cow! You mean that much money actually exists??
Notes:
Parent-subsidiary linkages are based on relationships current as of the latest revision listed in the Update Log, which may vary from what was the case when a violation occurred.
The penalty totals are adjusted to account for the fact that the individual entries below may include both agency records and settlement announcements for the same case; or else a penalty covering multiple locations may be listed in the individual records for each of the facilities.
The totals are also adjusted to reflect cases in which federal and state or local agencies cooperated and issued separate announcements of the outcome.
For an overview of this company’s accountability track record, read its Corporate Rap Sheet here.
For more details on misconduct by this company, see its entry in the Project On Government Oversight’s Federal Contractor Misconduct Database.
Subsidy Tracker data on financial assistance to this company by federal, state and local government agencies can be found here.
Violation Tracker UK data on for this company can be found here.
See more here: uncensored.co.nz
Header image: Upper Cumberland Business Journal
Please Donate Below To Support Our Ongoing Work To Defend The Scientific Method
PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL, legally registered in the UK as a company 
incorporated for charitable purposes. Head Office: 27 Old Gloucester Street, London WC1N 3AX.
Trackback from your site.
Peter F Gill
| #
I wonder if “Naughty” is quite the right word?
Reply
Stephen
| #
Definitely “naughty” must be a bit of a tongue in cheek word. In my mind a company with such a lousy record should have been closed down years ago, they disgust me with that legacy.
Reply
Dan
| #
They figure it as just a cost of doing business and taxpayers always bail them out! Think about it.
Reply
T Brew
| #
And… where does this money go? These violations are just another source of revenue for the govt, which incentivizes looking away in yet another fashion. “too big to fail”. We need to introduce a 3 strikes law or something similar. Including prosecutions and firings of the perpetrators where intention is found, as well as route the fines to groups who will actually watch them. Incentivize the watch dogs, not the blindfolds!
Reply
Purebloodpatriot
| #
I recommend everyone to read Real Anthony Fauci by Bobby Kennedy Jr. On chapther 3 he explains how Ivermectin could have saved 80 percent of deaths Worldwide. This book have opened my eyes. I now know that, 90% of all medicine is not for anything else than profit for them. Low profit and effective medicines are bashed and marketed as ineffective because they go against their narrative and profit plans. One of them is wonder drug Ivermectin. I see that everyday people search for it but can’t find a place to obtain. You can get yours by visiting https://ivmcures.com
Reply
Mervyn
| #
You have to wonder why the SEC has never had the directors jailed.
Reply