NASA found evidence of enough water on Venus to support life
VENUS has been chosen as the destination for two new NASA missions to investigate the planet’s atmosphere and geological features, following the discovery of “enough water to support plentiful life” by NASA
The space agency has announced it will send two robotic missions to the planet by the end of the decade.
NASA administrator Bill Nelson said the probes — named Davinci+ and Veritas — will offer the “chance to investigate a planet we haven’t been to in more than 30 years“.
The missions to Earth’s closest planetary neighbour were picked following a peer-review process and will explore how the once habitable world became a “hot, hellish, unforgiving” planet.
It comes just months after astronomers from the UK controversially detected phosphine gas 30 miles up in Venus’ clouds, leading researchers to suggest it was a sign of alien life.
Scientists at NASA’s Goddard Institute for Space Studies (GISS) also previously found that Venus may have once had a shallow liquid-water ocean and a habitable surface temperature for up to two billion years.
The findings, published in the journal Geophysical Research Letters, were obtained with a model similar to the type used to predict future climates on Earth.
Michael Way, a researcher at GISS and the paper’s lead author, said: “Many of the same tools we use to model climate change on Earth can be adapted to study climates on other planets, both past and present.
“These results show ancient Venus may have been a very different place than it is today.”
Scientists have long theorized that Venus was formed out of ingredients similar to Earth’s, but followed a different evolutionary path.
Measurements by NASA’s Pioneer mission to Venus in the Eighties first suggested Venus originally may have had an ocean, but its proximity to the Sun means it receives far more sunlight than Earth.
This led scientists to believe that the planet’s early ocean evaporated, water-vapour molecules were broken apart by ultraviolet radiation, and hydrogen escaped to space.
With no water left on the surface, carbon dioxide built up in the atmosphere, causing a runaway greenhouse effect that created present conditions.
The GIIS team also suggested the 2016 data showed ancient Venus had more dry land overall than Earth, especially in the tropics.
A NASA press release added:
“This type of surface appears ideal for making a planet habitable, there seems to have been enough water to support abundant life, with sufficient land to reduce the planet’s sensitivity to changes from incoming sunlight.”
Researchers simulated conditions of a hypothetical early Venus with an atmosphere similar to Earth’s, a day as long as Venus’ current day, and a shallow ocean consistent with early data from the Pioneer spacecraft.
C0-author Anthony Del Genio said:
“In the GISS model’s simulation, Venus’ slow spin exposes its dayside to the Sun for almost two months at a time.
This warms the surface and produces rain that creates a thick layer of clouds, which acts like an umbrella to shield the surface from much of the solar heating.
The result is mean climate temperatures that are actually a few degrees cooler than Earth’s today.”
The last US probe to visit Venus was the Magellan orbiter in 1990. However, other spacecraft – from Europe and Japan – have orbited the planet since then.
The Davinci+ (Deep Atmosphere Venus Investigation of Noble gases, Chemistry, and Imaging) mission will measure the planet’s atmosphere to gain insight into how it formed and evolved.
It will also aim to determine whether Venus ever had an ocean.
DAVINCI+ may also shed some light on observations of phosphine gas in Venus’s atmosphere.
If the spacecraft finds compelling evidence of the chemical phosphine, it may be a sign of life in the Venusian clouds.
The other mission, Veritas (Venus Emissivity, Radio Science, InSAR, Topography, and Spectroscopy), will map the planet’s surface to understand its geological history and investigate how it developed so differently than Earth.
It will use a form of radar to chart surface elevations and discover whether volcanoes and earthquakes are active.
See more here physics-astronomy.com
Some bold emphasis added
Editor’s note: PSI strongly refutes any notion of carbon dioxide-induced warming. We publish this article for information, and to generate debate.
Please Donate Below To Support Our Ongoing Work To Defend The Scientific Method
PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL, legally registered in the UK as a company 
incorporated for charitable purposes. Head Office: 27 Old Gloucester Street, London WC1N 3AX.
Trackback from your site.
Dale Horst
| #
The script is already written. This can happen to earth unless you change your wanting ways. The media coverage will be unprecedented.
Reply
VOWG
| #
Meaningless.
Reply
Jerry Krause
| #
The PSI Editor commented: “PSI strongly refutes any notion of carbon dioxide-induced warming. We publish this article for information, and to generate debate.
This is a case where I strongly disagree with the PSI Editor. The foundation of SCIENCE is not debate; instead, its foundation is the reproducible observation of FACT.
Have a good day
Reply
n
| #
Why don’t the GLOBALIST CABAL, who want a fossil fuel free environment, with no internal combustion vehicles, no gas stoves, no air conditioners, and to ‘own nothing,’ all sign up for the first trip there, ‘where they can all be happy’ together?
Reply
Jerry Krause
| #
This morning, as I observed out of my window, I was reminded of a meteorological factor which is only commonly observed at airports–visibility. The visibility measured has a maximum of 10 miles. However, I have home where I can sometimes see up to 60 miles. Which causes me to ask the question: What, in the atmosphere, is limiting its value? For when raining large droplets the visibility at airports is measured to be the maximum 10 miles. This morning the factor limiting visibility we term fog–a cloud touching the earth’s surface. Another factor which limits my 60mile visibility we term haze. And then there is the smoke of wildfires.
My purpose for directing your attention to ‘visibility is not, at this point, to try to explain it, but merely to see if anyone else has some explanations to share.
Have a good day
Reply
Jerry Krause
| #
Hi Commenters and other Readers.
I try to draw attention to others in my comments however a fact is that I attended the International Colloquium On Venus at Pasadena CA August 10-12 1992 where I had a poster presentation which featured the Crookes radiometer. As common I made a terrible mistake as I had not observed the radiational direction of the vanes of this instrument. But it didn’t matter because no one pointed, for whatever reason, to my error.
A major reason for this international was that NASA had recently had a satellite which orAbited Venus and mapped the Venusian surface with radar. And the Russian counterparts to the NASA scientists had been brought to the USA because the Russian economy had collapsed.
I only review this history because it seems Umer Abrar is unaware of what NASA and the Russians had learned about the surface and atmosphere of Venus. For while there is water, the majority of it is found in sulfuric solutions of the cloud droplets which prevent the surface from being seen from the satellites orbiting the planet.
Have a good day
a
Reply