Moss Landing battery goes offline due to overheating for second time
An energy storage facility owned by Vistra Energy in Moss Landing, California houses the largest lithium-ion battery in the world. The only problem is the battery packs keep on melting.
Last weekend on February 13, the facility experienced another meltdown, the second in five months, according to local broadcaster KSBW.
What could be going wrong?
Battery packs melted
It all began when four fire trucks responded to a fire alarm at the energy company’s site.
When they arrived the fire had been subdued by the facility’s fire suppression system.
There were no flames but ten lithium-ion battery packs had been melted.
Vistra then released the following statement on February 15:
“Late on February 13, the early detection safety system activated in the 100-megawatt Phase II building at our Moss Landing Energy Storage Facility. As is our protocol at all of our facilities, we contacted off-site emergency response out of an abundance of caution.
The building’s systems contained the event without the need for outside assistance. There are no injuries to personnel.”
Fragile systems
The previous fire had occurred in September and had set off sprinklers that damaged around 7,000 batteries.
The incidents illustrate how fragile battery storage systems are.
Lithium-ion batteries not only ignite easily but also produce fires that are difficult to contain because water does not put them out.
Vistra added that it was now looking further into the new incident.
“An investigation is underway to determine what caused the safety system to activate. While this is in its very early stages, what we know is the water-based suppression system released water that contacted some batteries. There is early evidence that water hoses leaked and that some batteries shorted, creating smoke in the building, similar to what we observed with the September incident at our 300-MW Phase I facility next door,” added the company in its statement.
In the meantime, the facility remains offline to avoid any future fire incidents while the problem is worked out.
See more here: interestingengineering.com
Header image: Wikimedia Commons
Bold emphasis added
Please Donate Below To Support Our Ongoing Work To Defend The Scientific Method
PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL, legally registered in the UK as a company 
incorporated for charitable purposes. Head Office: 27 Old Gloucester Street, London WC1N 3AX.Â
Trackback from your site.
Andy
| #
These ‘battery farms’ are an accident waiting to happen.
Reply
Howdy
| #
‘Incendiary Storage Facility’
four fire trucks responded but not needed.
Weigh up how much stored energy alone has been lost in the two incidents. How much more it cost in restoration, external services, not including all the replacements.
“the water-based suppression system released water that contacted some batteries. There is early evidence that water hoses leaked”
You’ve got to be kidding me! Water spraying in the presence of high voltages, and it gets inside the equipment? Where is the moisture sealing? Doesn’t the equipment contain any kind of internal fire suppression?
A leak? Ever heard of preventative maintenance?
As allways with this nonsense, the questions come later…
I would have thought 2 incidents would be enough for most people, but maybe the third is what destroys the whole setup next time.
Reply
schutzhund
| #
sabotage?
Reply
Howdy
| #
Hi schutzhund,
“sabotage?”
Oddly enough, it appears the first fire was due to water leaks too.
“When the accident occurred, a small number of joints on the hoses and pipes that were part of the battery cooling system failed, causing water to be sprayed on the battery rack. This in turn leads to short circuit and arc, which leads to battery damage and more smoke.”
https://news.metal.com/newscontent/101754521/Second-fire-Accidents-continue-to-occur-at-the-largest-energy-storage-battery-power-station-in-the-world/
Reply
Tom
| #
More proof liberals act out of insanity and agenda and never look beyond their brain farts. This is the dumbest technology ever invented.
Reply
T. C. Clark
| #
There are many battery technologies – sodium-ion batteries may be a better choice for a utility over lithium but apparently none are ready for prime time. If the use of batteries is about CO2 then it’s all a waste of time and money anyways.
Reply