More analysis of US Nursing Home data proves vaxxes made it more likely for elderly to die
For every nursing home where the infection fatality rate decreased post-COVID vaccine there were 6.5 nursing homes where it increased by a comparable amount. That’s a disaster
The US Nursing Home data is ground truth for the COVID vaccine. If it doesn’t work for the very population it was supposed to benefit the most, it’s all over.
I can assure you, the COVID vaccine didn’t reduce the risk of a COVID death for the elderly or anyone else for that matter. It did the opposite.
I looked at aggregate numbers (aggregating cases and deaths) as well as analysis on a per nursing home basis (looking at the number of nursing homes where things got better vs. worse).
Any way you analyze it, it’s a disaster.
Apparently, there is no way to analyze this data that makes the vaccine successful. This is why nobody has ever been able to do this, despite the fact that the data has been publicly available for over 2 years.
In other words, you cannot make the signal “go away.”
Here are a few key arguments:
- There are no papers that take this “gold standard” data on the most important population for the and use it to show that the vaccines worked.
- “Experts” like UPenn Professor Jeffrey Morris are completely incapable of explaining how nursing homes like Apple Valley Village went from a 0 in 27 death rates before the shots to a 28 deaths in 90 infections just 4 weeks post-vaccine. It’s the same variant. How can it suddenly be more deadly?
- Data published in a paper in JAMA showed that at 128 Veterans Health Administration community living centers, the infection fatality rate (IFR) increased by 28% in residents who opted for the booster shots. While the increase was not statistically significant because the death numbers were too low, the trend was clearly in the wrong direction.
- I just finished analyzing each of the 15,197 nursing homes providing data to the CDC. It turns out that for every nursing home where there was an IFR mortality improvement, there were 6.6X where the rates were worse by a comparable amount. This is an utter disaster for the narrative. If the vaccines worked, it should have been the other way around. This is why all the pro-vaccine advocates avoid this data at all costs. A 6.6 odds of getting worse isn’t likely to have happened by chance (1126 homes vs. 169 homes).
- There is nothing wrong with the data. The data was used in a peer-reviewed paper published in JAMA, but that paper didn’t look at the IFR at all.
- The data is aligned with the first-hand anecdotes. For example, at Apple Valley Village the people who worked there saw a massive number of deaths right after the vaccines rolled out: the largest number of deaths in their history: 50 people in January 2021 which is roughly 1 out of every 3 residents in a single month. In a normal January, they will get just 5 deaths. How do “they” explain that? Apple Valley Village isn’t returning any phone calls. They don’t want to talk about it. I wonder why? Neither does anyone else. Professor Morris doesn’t want to talk about it at all.
Another anecdote
How do they explain anecdotes like this one? If the vaccine is safe and effective, such anecdotes should not exist:
A 75 percent death rate within 14 days?
This doesn’t surprise me at all because I found over 1,000 nursing homes in the CDC database where the death rate went up by a factor of 2 or more post-jab and over 100 nursing homes where the IFR jumped to 50 percent or more.
Another anecdote
Watch this video done by James Devalon, a 10-year CNA… 5 cases, no deaths pre-vaccine. 14 deaths within 2 weeks post-vaccine. The vaccine is seriously injuring patients (they lose ability to walk, think, etc) and killing others.
He realizes he’ll be fired for speaking out. He has nothing to gain.
The question is, if it wasn’t the vaccine causing these observations, what is causing them?
The vaccine causing cases and deaths is consistent with what this nursing home employee observed. If there is a hypothesis that better fits the observations, I’d love to hear it.
Another anecdote
Have you noticed all the highly respected people who have, all of a sudden, decided to become “misinformation spreaders.” Have you ever asked yourself why?
The nursing home data
All the data and the software are in my github and have been publicly available since the time I first started looking at the data.
The analysis of cases and deaths 12 weeks before the vax rollout vs. 12 weeks after vax rollout can be found here (see the analysis 3 tab of the spreadsheet). You can see the 6.6 odds in that spreadsheet.
Where is their analysis of the data showing the vaccine was a huge success?
It doesn’t exist.
Next step
Next up: get other epidemiologists to acknowledge the data in plain sight, starting with those on our side of the narrative and progressing to those in the middle next.
Summary
I finally got record level data on the vaccine and just as predicted, it’s a disaster for the narrative. The CDC Nursing Home data shows very clearly that the COVID vaccines made things much worse for the elderly.
They don’t want to talk about it. But I do.
I will continue to focus on this like a dog on a bone.
It’s time for them to face the facts.
See more here substack.com
Some bold emphasis added
Please Donate Below To Support Our Ongoing Work To Expose The Lies About Covid 19
PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL, legally registered in the UK as a company 
incorporated for charitable purposes. Head Office: 27 Old Gloucester Street, London WC1N 3AX.
Trackback from your site.
VOWG
| #
We keep seeing the lie that cases and deaths decreased somewhere because of the vax, They did not. Any one who did not get the whu who flu, vaxxed or other wise was (a) not exposed to it or (b) their immune system prevented infection. None of the vaxxes prevented or delayed infection. WE can paly all the chart games forever, those two simple facts cannot be disputed rationally.
Reply
Jerry Krause
| #
Hi VOWG,
Somehow I overlooked this comment the first time. This demonstrates the value of rereading. For this, your, comment is longer than many of the past as you try to help a reader see the FACTS that WE have seen previously and THEY probably have also seen because of the efforts of the GIANTS OF THE PAST.
Have a good day
Reply
jerry Krause
| #
What Is the fact that your comments to so many articles, where your comments are the only ones, telling you about the other many PSI readers?
Reply
VOWG
| #
play
Reply
Richard Greene
| #
In early 2020 it became obvious people with comorbidities were the most likely to die from Covid. Most were elderly. It’s obvious their immune systems were the least likely to handle spike proteins. It should be no surprise that simiar people were reported dying in VAERS soon after getting Covid shots, and having their own bodies generating spike proteins. The processes are not identical, but the spike proteins can not be handled properly by a small minority of immune systems. That minority increases significantly with age.
There is evidence spike proteins generated by shots are NOT often very short term. Sometimes no antibodies develop as if some shots were placebos. Other times the spike proteins are generated for up to six months (possibly longer — the study ended at six months. More evidence the shots were not doing what they were intended to do. I’ll reply to this note with a link, if this website accepts links.
Reply
Richard Greene
| #
https://www.lewrockwell.com/2023/09/joseph-mercola/covid-jab-spike-protein-remains-six-months-after-jab/
Reply
Herb Rose
| #
Hi Richard,
These MRNA shots were developed for SARS-1, but when tested on animals they were so lethal that they were never approved. Why were they approved for SARS-2 (Covid) without testing?
I am still waiting for an answer on how the surface of the Earth can heat the air over the ocean to a higher temperature than the surface of the ocean.
I have SCUBA dived off of Quatalajara Mexico and it is necessary to wear a wet suite because the water is so cold. The air over the water is so hot you need to get into the water to cool down. I think the premise that the sun is not heating the atmosphere is BS.
Herb
Reply
Richard Greene
| #
The SARS 2 shot was developed for SARS2, tested on monkeys and they did not die.
The heat capacity of the ocean is much greater than that of the atmosphere or the land. As the ocean slowly warms in the summer, keeping air cool, and it slowly cools in winter, keeping the air warm. The reason the water feels colder than air is because water is the better conductor of the two. Your
“experiment” is not going to win a Nobel Prize.
Reply
Herb Rose
| #
Hi Richard,
In the SARS-1 testing the animals survived the first exposure to the disease but died on the second. The shots produce antibodies for the proteins being created by the MRNA but no T cell protection. If there is a mutation the antibodies aid the infection of cells (ADE). Since there are no killer T cells to eliminate infected cells the second exposure is far more severe.
In the troposphere the transfer of energy between object is done be convection. This obeys the law of conservation of momentum. An object with more velocity (energy) will transfer energy to an object with less energy regardless of their masses. It is not possible to increase the energy of the object with less energy to be greater than the object with more energy no matter how many objects strike it. Once an air molecule’s energy is in equilibrium with the energy of the water (or land) it cannot be raise by it. The maximum temperature of an object can never exceed the temperature of the source of energy.
Herb
Reply