Merging Magma Chambers Fuelled Tonga Eruption

Researchers have mapped the magma plumbing system beneath Tonga’s underwater volcano and discovered three magma chambers, two of which fed the record-shattering 2022 eruption

Almost two years after a humongous eruption rocked Tonga’s Hunga volcano in the southwest Pacific Ocean, scientists have finally mapped the huge magma plumbing system that gave birth to the record-breaking blast.

On Jan. 15, 2022, a volcano beneath the island of Hunga Tonga-Hunga Ha’apai exploded with such force it triggered the most intense lightning storm ever recorded and the first documented mega tsunami since antiquity.

The eruption was felt worldwide, but the volcano’s underwater setting posed a challenge for scientists trying to understand how such a violent blast occurred.

Now, in a study published Dec. 15 in the journal Science Advances, researchers have mapped slight variations in the pull of gravity in waters around the island before and after the eruption and found the explosion was likely fed by two magma chambers that merged.

“I was happily surprised that we can indeed image a relatively large magmatic system using this kind of dataset and method,” said lead author Hélène Le Mével, a volcanologist and staff scientist at the Carnegie Institution for Science in Washington D.C. This kind of work “is rarely done to study submarine volcanoes,” Le Mével told Live Science in an email.

The magma reservoirs sit at different depths between 6,600 and 33,000 feet (2 and 10 kilometers) under the volcano and likely stored a high proportion of liquid magma before the 2022 eruption, according to the study.

A diagram from the new study showing the organisation of the magma plumbing system beneath the Tonga volcano before, during and after the 2022 eruption. (Image credit: Le Mével et al. (2023))

The researchers found that the blast ejected roughly 30% of the magma — more than 2.1 cubic miles (9 cubic kilometers) — from a shallow central chamber, which caused the roof of the volcano to cave in and form a 2,800-foot-deep (850 meters) bowl-like depression called a caldera.

As the pressure in the central reservoir dropped following the explosion, magma stored in a deeper reservoir to the north may have burst through the crust and replenished the central reservoir, opening up a channel between the two chambers.

It’s also possible that magma from a gas-rich source deeper within Earth’s crust rose to the central chamber, which “may also explain the violence of the 2022 eruption,” according to the study.

A third pocket of magma, located to the northwest of the central chamber, seems disconnected from the system and might represent “an older, solidifying mush zone,” the authors wrote.

Up to 6.2 cubic miles (26 cubic km) of eruptible magma could still lurk in the two main reservoirs beneath the Hunga volcano, according to the study — enough to fill 10 million Olympic-size swimming pools. (Eruptible magma is defined as magma that is over 50% melt and low in crystal solids.)

While the study revealed what fueled the volcano, it couldn’t show what triggered the massive eruption. “By themselves the gravity results wouldn’t directly allow us to conclude on the eruption trigger,” Le Mével said, but they give researchers “an idea of where and how much magma could be stored under the volcano.”

The findings may also be limited because they used satellite data that may have been affected by ocean waves and changes in gravity from the seafloor to the sea surface, the researchers noted in the study.

“We only have information about what changed over a one year interval so we cannot say specifically what happened during the eruption,” Le Mével said. But the data suggest “new pathways between reservoirs were created,” she added.

It’s been 900 years since an eruption of this scale last shook the island, Le Mével said, but smaller eruptions occur more frequently.

A previous eruption in 2015 birthed a cone of land connecting two islands, Hunga Tonga and Hunga Ha’apai, which form the only visible part of the 6,600-foot-tall (2,000 m) volcano.

The giant 2022 eruption destroyed the cone and reduced the subaerial Hunga Tonga-Hunga Ha’apai edifice to two thin slivers of land.

See more here livescience.com

Header image: CNRS News

Please Donate Below To Support Our Ongoing Work To Defend The Scientific Method

PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL, legally registered in the UK as a company incorporated for charitable purposes. Head Office: 27 Old Gloucester Street, London WC1N 3AX. 

Trackback from your site.

Comments (4)

  • Avatar

    James Edward Kamis

    |

    Another research study that proves Geological Impacts on Climate have a greatly underestimated influence or in some cases completely control climate and climate related events.

    Reply

  • Avatar

    Frank S.

    |

    I was sitting on my porch the day of the Tonga eruption. It sounded like a large M-80 blast. I live over 3,000 miles away.

    Reply

  • Avatar

    Jerry Krause

    |

    Hi PSI Readers,

    The lead author is Hélène Le Mével, and she earned her Ph.D degree in 2016. As an experimentalist I earned a Ph.D degree in 1969, however I conclude I did not become a physical scientist until about 1990 something when I finally read Henry Crew’s and Alfonso de Salvio’s 1914 English translation of Galileo Galilei famous 1638 book “Dialogues Concerning Two New Sciences”

    We read that Hélène’s paper was published in the journal Science Advances about which I read: “Science Advances is the American Association for the Advancement of Science’s (AAAS) open access multidisciplinary journal, publishing impactful research papers and reviews in any area of science, in both disciplinary-specific and broad, interdisciplinary areas.” So while Science Advances is aviated with AAAS, this journal isn’t AAAs’s journal Science.

    Hence,, this article has been sent to PSI to increase its readership because PSI publishes articles which the journal Science would never publish. I write this comment to encourage practice PSI readers to read the English translation of Galileo’s famous book which he wrote in the common Italian language because he considered the practical Italian people of 1638 could understand it. And even I, an practical experimentalist, could understand it to become a scientist

    Have a good day

    Reply

    • Avatar

      Jerry Krause

      |

      Hi MattH,

      Maybe I should wait longer to give you a chance to comment of my recent comment. Look in a mrror and ask yourself: Have I read Galileo’s famous book?

      Have a good day

      Reply

Leave a comment

Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment.
Share via