Medical Journal Violates Publication Ethics Guidelines
In a stunning act of scientific censorship, little known publication integrity staffer Tim Kersjes has retracted a manuscript authored by epidemiologist M. Nathaniel Mead, MSc, after the paper drew global attention to the Springer Nature Cureus platform with record views/reads/downloads
The paper called for a halt in COVID-19 mass vaccination based on a valid evaluation of the evidence.
It topped >330,000 views/reads/downloads in a month as compared to an average Cureus-promoted paper which has only ~2700 in a year.
A rating of >9.2 is considered “excellent” and “groundbreaking” appropriately characterizing this extensively cited paper with 293 references (average paper has 30).
Kersjes raised eight points previously handled in an exhaustive peer-review process.
The journal and its editors had the right to reject the paper any time during the review process.
Once published, it is a violation of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) Guidelines to retract paper without adequate justification.
The authors’ rebuttal to this bold and unethical action taken by the publisher is posted below so you can see the points raised and responses.
Please see the publication link and download your PDF version before it is censored off the platform.
Here is the online notice of retraction:
The authors will proceed with publication in an alternate journal.
See more here substack.com
Header image: MarTech
Bold emphasis added
Please Donate Below To Support Our Ongoing Work To Expose The Lies About Covid 19
PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL, legally registered in the UK as a company 
incorporated for charitable purposes. Head Office: 27 Old Gloucester Street, London WC1N 3AX.
Trackback from your site.
Tom
| #
At this point, can we trust any medical journal and it’s articles over the last 30 years? It’s all voodoo and not much more than a cannibal’s cook book.
Reply
Saeed Qureshi
| #
Do not worry about a particular publication or similar, anything related to the virus and the vaccine will be withdrawn as fake and false from the so-called “scientific” journals. A higher number of readings of something does not establish that a publication is valid or scientific.
https://bioanalyticx.com/it-has-to-happen-the-sooner-the-better/
Reply