Matt Hancock ‘Acted Unlawfully’ in Hiding Crony COVID Contracts
In England the High Court ruled the Health Secretary had “breached his legal obligation” to publish details of contracts within 30 days in “a substantial number of cases.
Matt Hancock acted unlawfully when he failed to publish details of billions of pounds’ worth of coronavirus-related contracts, the High Court has ruled.
In a ruling last Friday, Mr Justice Chamberlain said the Health Secretary had “breached his legal obligation” to publish details of the contract within 30 days in “a substantial number of cases.”
The Government is required by law to publish a “contract award notice” within 30 days of the award of any contracts for public goods or services worth more than £120,000.
The judge said the obligation to publish such contracts was “serve a vital public function and that function was no less important during a pandemic”.
The Good Law Project took legal action against the Department of Health and Social Care (DHSC) for its “wholesale failure” to disclose details of contracts agreed during the Covid-19 pandemic.
At a hearing earlier this month, the group, along with three MPs – Labour’s Debbie Abrahams, the Green Party’s Caroline Lucas and Liberal Democrat Layla Moran – argued there had been a “dismal” failure by the DHSC to comply with the obligation.
They also claimed the Government was breaching its own transparency policy, which requires the publication of details of public contracts worth more than £10,000.
Mr Justice Chamberlain added: “The Secretary of State spent vast quantities of public money on pandemic-related procurements during 2020.
“The public were entitled see who this money was going to, what it was being spent on and how the relevant contracts were awarded.
“This was important not only so that competitors of those awarded contracts could understand whether the obligations … had been breached, but also so that oversight bodies such as the National Audit Office, as well as Parliament and the public, could scrutinise and ask questions about this expenditure.”
The judge accepted that the situation the DHSC faced in the first months of the pandemic was “unprecedented”, when “large quantities of goods and services had to be procured in very short timescales”.
And he said it was “understandable that attention was focused on procuring what was thought necessary to save lives”.
But he added that the DHSC’s “historic failure” to comply with the obligations to publish contracts because of the difficulties caused by the pandemic was “an excuse, not a justification”.
In a statement after the ruling, the Good Law Project said: “This judgment is a victory for all of us concerned with proper governance and proof of the power of litigation to hold Government to account.
“But there is still a long way to go before the Government’s house is in order.”
In a letter to Health Secretary Matt Hancock, the Good Law Project’s founder Jolyon Maugham QC invited the minister to agree to publish the names of all companies awarded public contracts under a fast-track “VIP lane” and how much they were paid.
Mr Maugham also asked Mr Hancock to “commit to recovering public money from all the companies who failed to meet their contractual obligations” and set up “a judge-led public inquiry into the handling of PPE procurement”.
Ms Abrahams said in a tweet: “The significance of this ruling cannot be underestimated. It seems odd having to make this point but the Government must act within the law when awarding contracts.”
Ms Lucas said: “This indictment of Government secrecy should spell the end of the culture of cronyism which has swallowed billions of pounds of public money during Covid crisis.”
More at www.mirror.co.uk
Please Donate Below To Support Our Ongoing Work To Expose The Lies About COVID19
PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL, legally registered in the UK as a company incorporated for charitable purposes. Head Office: 27 Old Gloucester Street, London WC1N 3AX.
Please DONATE TODAY To Help Our Non-Profit Mission To Defend The Scientific Method.
Trackback from your site.
tom0mason
| #
High Court ruled the Health Secretary had “breached his legal obligation” to publish details of contracts within 30 days in “a substantial number of cases.
Matt Hancock acted unlawfully when he failed to publish details of billions of pounds’ worth of coronavirus-related contracts, the High Court has ruled.
Of course that is the case for the UK Government has over the years snuggled ever closer to International Big Banking and Investments, so much so that when major player like Gates turns up to ‘advise’ the UK Government on a course of action, then the UK Government without any real critical thought, will do as Gates says. They do it while pleasing all the other crony capitalists they are in the pockets of, don’t they Mr. Hancock?
Companies like Serco – eh, Mr Hancock? See https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/test-and-trace-private-companies-serco-health-secretary-matt-hancock-a9699616.html .
Serco the big international company, with plenty of UK Government contracts. Serco helping to weaken and destabilize Great Britain.
Other Serco failures https://www.nhsforsale.info/private-providers/serco-new/ and https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-8343613/Serco-Private-contractor-leading-UKs-coronavirus-contact-tracing-programme-beset-controversy.html , and https://www.independent.co.uk/news/business/news/serco-fine-electronic-tagging-scandal-overcharging-government-a8985801.html “Despite a string of scandals surrounding Serco, it won the largest ever UK government contract in January – a £1.9bn deal to manage 5,000 properties occupied by asylum seekers …”
Reply
NecktopPC
| #
“We’re (they’re) All In This Together.”
Reply
John Doran
| #
Other concerned individuals are attempting to hold the fraudsters to account:
http://www.thebernician.net/r-pub-v-hancock-others-2021-public-notice-of-intended-prosecution/
Here’s hoping.
JD.
Reply
Carbon Bigfoot
| #
Hot of the Epoch Times Presses:
https://www.theepochtimes.com/chinese-communist-regime-withheld-pandemic-data-from-who-leaked-documents-reveal_3704771.html?utm_source=news&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=breaking-2021-02-21-3
Reply