London council forced to replace sleep-disturbing LED streetlights
A woman has won a “landmark” case against a council arguing she was kept awake by streetlights
Sasha Rodoy argued that she found the brightness of the LED streetlights outside her London home unbearable.
The 70-year-old incurred about £50,000 in legal costs to fight the planned change to Barnet borough’s lighting, which she said she did in the public interest in what Rodoy claimed was the first case of its kind in the UK.
Rodoy suffers from photophobia, a heightened sensitivity to light, which was caused by eye surgery several years ago.
Rodoy complained to the north London council that the glare from the energy-efficient lights installed from 2019, and estimated to save the council £750,000 a year, hurt her eyes and affected her sleep because of the blue glow that they emitted.
She told The Times:
“I’m not the only person to complain about the effects of these lights…The first time I went out after dark to walk my dog, I felt like I’d walked on to a floodlit football pitch and could hardly open my eyes against the glare.”
The 4000K LED lanterns were replaced with 2200K warm white LEDs, or an equivalent, to provide lighting similar to the high-pressure sodium lights in use before 2019. A spokesman for Barnet said that the council was “pleased to have reached an agreement” with Rodoy.
It comes after the London Borough of Havering said it will lower the brightness of 4,000 lights on its main roads between midnight and 5am.
The council, which is led by a Havering Residents Association and Labour coalition, said last week it had passed its “toughest budget ever” with huge cuts amid a £32.5million deficit which is projected to rise to £81.9million over the next four years.
The Suzy Lamplugh Trust, which supports victims of stalking, told Daily Mail:
“What we would want to know is to what extent has the council consulted with local people about the proposed changes and how will they monitor the impact of the changes on people’s feelings of, and actual, safety?
In addition, we would emphasise that street lighting in any case is not the answer to tackling crime including violence against women and girls and we would urge the council to publish their wider plans to tackle this.”
Leader of Havering Council Ray Morgon said:
“We fully recognise the worries around safety and this is why, in our budget savings, we are only proposing plans to dim the street lights on our main roads between 12am and 5am.
Street lighting on residential roads would remain on full power and brightness. This has been consulted on as part of the budget consultation where nearly 4,000 people responded.
With regards to the question around dimming lights, the majority of respondents to that question felt the street lighting proposals would have little or no impact on either them personally (59 per cent) or the community (42 per cent).
Indeed some respondents felt the proposals would have a positive impact on themselves (24 per cent) and on the community (29 per cent) than a negative impact.
There has some concern expressed during consultation that this may lead to an increase in some crime but Officers who have been involved in similar schemes in other boroughs found no evidence of this.
We will of course consult with the police and relevant partners to ensure lighting that supports CCTV provision is not compromised.”
See more here gbnews.com
Header image: Getty Images
Please Donate Below To Support Our Ongoing Work To Defend The Scientific Method
PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL, legally registered in the UK as a company 
incorporated for charitable purposes. Head Office: 27 Old Gloucester Street, London WC1N 3AX.
Trackback from your site.
solarsmurph
| #
Although LED lighting seems to be more efficient power consumption wise, there still needs a lot of work for it to be acceptable. The colour is very harsh, the intensity is like a laser beam, the flickering/pulsing while not that noticeable – when you finally recognize it is there is hard on the eyes and headaches, and the EMF/RF coming from the lights is measurable and has been warned about for several years and causes headaches and has been linked to cancer and other biological disturbances. Don’t take me wrong – we do need more efficient lighting, but not at the cost of health problems.
Reply
Howdy
| #
While I sympathise with the victims woe, I’ll add this:
Street lights in my locale are daylight white LED. I consider them a vast improvement over the amber/yellow sodium lamps, which it appears, the colour was chosen as it reflects less in fog, like white headlights blocking the view more than illuminating it in foggy weather.
We don’t get the ‘pea souper’ fog any more, so no need for sub-standard illumination.
Leds are vastly superior in efficiency to incandescent lamps, though arguably, still not as powerful as gas discharge, which are also intense white.
If the ‘pulsing’ of the led can be noticed, the design is woefully incorrect. Street Leds run on DC, converted from AC mains.
Most equipment led displays use a pulsing technique to reduce power consumption by illuminating one segment (spot led) at a time, but in rapid succession so it appears the display is steadily lit. This runs at a much higher frequency than Humans can detect, but noticeable on a video for example, where the frequencies of the camera scanning, and led driver scanning can show up as a slowly moving display.
If you think street lights are bright try LCD back-lighting – extremely bright, but the glare is removed, and the light ‘smeared’ to remove the individual led spots. Still, same white. Do monitors cause cancer due to the light output?
Reply
Ken Hughes
| #
Ah. So t’s al about surveillance then.
Reply