Let the Crow Eating Begin
Newsweek just published an editorial by Kevin Bass, a medical school student in Texas, about how the official scientific establishment in the United States got it wrong about COVID-19
At the risk of sounding immodest, all of the realizations that he catalogues in his essay were apparent to me by May of 2020, almost three years go.
People often ask me why I perceived at the beginning of this mess that our public health officials were lying to us.
The answer is simple: I am a longstanding student of history (including medical history) and of human nature.
It is precisely a lack of education in history that made so many people susceptible to being manipulated and defrauded by the Bio-Pharmaceutical Complex.
Students of political history have often marveled that the Anglo-Irish statesman, Edmund Burke, made all of his accurate predictions about the French Revolution in 1790.
Burke foresaw that the Jacobins would grossly mismanage everything and then resort to terror when none of their harebrained schemes worked.
He predicted the bloody fiasco would end with the accession to power of a military commander.
Three years after Burke’s Reflections on the Revolution in France was published, the Reign of Terror began. Nine years later, Napoleon Bonaparte came to power through a combination of subterfuge and soldiers with fixed bayonets.
How did Burke make these predictions? He knew history and he understood human nature. He therefore saw that the Jacobins had no idea what they were doing.
None of their abstract schemes acknowledged the complex reality of human affairs. Their entire conception of reality was ideological, not practical, and they insisted on imposing it with fanatical zeal.
Precisely the same is true of the Vaccine Syndicate that ran the official Pandemic Response. Its leaders are votaries of the COVID-19 Vaccine Cult, and all of their policies were in the service of getting a needle in every arm. Their monolithic policy totally ignored the complex reality of the problem.
Those familiar with history (and medical history) could see by April of 2020 that “The Science” constantly invoked by our government health agencies was an ideological construct—an Orthodoxy—and not true science.
True scientific inquiry was conducted by doctors in the field who had the courage to treat the illness instead of waiting for the heralded “vaccine.”
Kevin Bass’s Newsweek is a good start. May the rest of the Official “Follow the Science” Establishment get out their forks and knives and start eating crow.
See more here substack.com
Please Donate Below To Support Our Ongoing Work To Expose The Lies About Covid 19
PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL, legally registered in the UK as a company 
incorporated for charitable purposes. Head Office: 27 Old Gloucester Street, London WC1N 3AX.
Trackback from your site.
Itsme
| #
our ‘government health agencies’, bankers, and puppet politicians knew exactly what they were doing – and they haven’t finished yet
Reply
MattH
| #
Hi Jerry Krause and readers.
You will appreciate this Edmund Burke quote.
Never, no never, did Nature say one thing, and wisdom another.
Reply
Jerry Krause
| #
Hi Matt,
My cousin just (today) forwarded this email to me.
Einstein continued to work — and to share his wisdom, his wonder, and his compassionate insights — until his death in 1955 at age 76. Here are 13 quotes that illustrate the mind and humble heart of the once-in-a-lifetime scientist.
Imagination is more important than knowledge. Knowledge is limited. Imagination encircles the world.
I believe in intuitions and inspirations. I sometimes feel that I am right. I do not know that I am.
Try to become not a man of success, but try rather to become a man of value.
Although I am a typical loner in daily life, my consciousness of belonging to the invisible community of those who strive for truth, beauty, and justice has preserved me from feeling isolated.
I have no special talents. I am only passionately curious.
The most beautiful thing we can experience is the mysterious. It is the source of all true art and science. He to whom this emotion is a stranger, who can no longer pause to wonder and stand rapt in awe, is as good as dead: his eyes are closed.
Study and in general the pursuit of truth and beauty is a sphere of activity in which we are permitted to remain children all our lives.
Only a life lived for others is a life worthwhile.
Life is like riding a bicycle. To keep your balance you must keep moving.
Be a loner. That gives you time to wonder, to search for the truth. Have holy curiosity. Make your life worth living.
Nothing truly valuable arises from ambition or from a mere sense of duty; it stems rather from love and devotion towards men and towards objective things.
I am happy because I want nothing from anyone. I do not care about money. Decorations, titles, or distinctions mean nothing to me. I do not crave praise. The only thing that gives me pleasure, apart from my work, my violin, and my sailboat, is the appreciation of my fellow workers.
I never think of the future. It comes soon enough.
Reply
Saeed Qureshi
| #
Sorry to say, but it is a tricky way to rationalize and maintain fictitious activities of the profession and keep the public ignorant and in deception.
It is an unequivocally false claim. The scientific community did not fail.
The medical/pharmaceutical professionals and experts failed. These professionals falsely promoted and marketed themselves as scientists and followers of science – most certainly an untruthful claim.
However, they have never studied science, trained as scientists, or followed science.
The actual science was correct from the beginning demonstrating that there is neither a virus nor a pandemic. Therefore, there was no need for vaccines. Moreover, scientifically, developing a vaccine for a non-existing virus is impossible. Perhaps, more importantly, recommending the non-validated tests for monitoring the virus/pandemic violated the most fundamental principles of science. There is no excuse for authorities and experts ignoring/violating this essential scientific requirement, which clearly shows a lack of understanding of science and regulations.
It was repeatedly highlighted during the past three years that science is not being followed, and the story of the virus/pandemic has no scientific basis.
Please be honest, accept the truth, and allow science to work with medicines/chemicals.
For further information, see here (https://bioanalyticx.com/)
Reply
Jerry Krause
| #
Hi Saeed,
You just wrote: “the story of the virus/pandemic has no scientific basis.”
To date, I have not read, in your writings any explanation of how, or why, people, that I personally know, are dying of some illness. And until you explain the fact why they have died, you cannot claim something you don’t know. Like what the problem is NOT. I have studied chemistry, taught chemistry, practiced chemistry (a SCIENCE) for the vast majority of my lifetime up to the moment I write this. Do you want me to believe that people are dying of some non-existent cause?
I can admit I may’ have missed when you explained why some of my friends died, so please remind me if this is the case.
Have a good day. Jerry
Reply
denis dombas
| #
Jerry, are your friends “vaccinated” with covid 19 bio weapons?
Reply
Jerry Krause
| #
Yes
Reply
Saeed Qureshi
| #
Hello Jerry:
It seems you are fixed on the thought that there is an illness and people are dying. So, you assume that they are dying because of COVID-19. Therefore, your question is, if one does not accept that the illness is COVID-19, one must tell what it is.
I can not answer such a question, even if I try.
On the other hand, I am saying that people may be ill, but the suggested illness is incorrect. COVID-19 is claimed to be caused by the virus. However, no one has shown the existence of the virus. Hence, one cannot have COVID-19. Period!
If you see people sick, it could very well be a reflection of a normal body’s wear and tear or something else. Therefore, one must seek help from those with experience and expertise in establishing the illnesses.
However, one thing is certain no one has shown the virus or its illness (i.e., COVID-19).
Reply
Jerry Krause
| #
Hi Saeed,
Relative to your first paragraph. I do not assume “they are dying because of COVID-19”. I have read they are dying of a common symptom so I believe there is a common illness. You solve no problem by repeating and repeating “However, no one has shown the existence of the virus. Hence, one cannot have COVID-19. Period!” However, no one has shown the cause of the illness of which people have commonly died. So, can (should) we conclude there is no illness?
I claim to know little to nothing about this illness except I accept people are dying of the same unknown illness and the apparent fact there are people making money because of it by pushing that everyone needs to get the vaccines and boosters.
However, I must ask to clarify, when you state “no has shown the existence of the virus”, is this because no one has seem a virus with a super microscope? If this is correct, I ask you: Is it possible for a virus to be too small to be seen with the most powerful microscope?
Have a good day, Jerry
Reply
Saeed Qureshi
| #
@ “I accept people are dying of the same UNKNOWN illness …”
You believe in a narrative of an unknown disease promoted by people who gain from it. I cannot make it “known.” It is like making an unknown unicorn into a known unicorn.
@ “I ask you: Is it possible for a virus to be too small to be seen with the most powerful microscope?”
Again, you assume the virus is there, and a powerful microscope will see it. This is incorrect. Microscopes are fine and are capable of seeing such things, but they require isolated and purified viruses or alleged particles, but they are not there. No one has isolated them or purified them.
Reply
Jerry Krause
| #
Hi Saeed,
You wrote: “Again, you assume the virus is there, and a powerful microscope will see it.”
I am not assuming this. You clearly are!
Have a good day, Jerry
Reply
Robert Beatty
| #
Saeed Qureshi, previous comment, raises a critical point “The medical/pharmaceutical professionals and experts failed. These professionals falsely promoted and marketed themselves as scientists and followers of science – most certainly an untruthful claim.”
If we follow history on similar issues we find periodically populations are driven to the point where the elites are seen as the problem and a period of anarchy develops. This is usually followed by yet another form of top-down government which survives until the elites again become dominant and problematic.
The one exception to this sad cycle of repetitious behaviour Is Switzerland. They too had a period of anarchy which resulted in a Federal Charter which is considered the country’s founding document. This was modified periodically, but importantly embodies the principle of direct democracy, or bottom-up government.
Bottom-up government keeps tax payers closely in touch with the spenders, so government largess can never get started in the first place. It also ensures the elites are held accountable through their constitutions. We need to redraft our constitutions throughout the g7 nations, to constrain the elites from imposing their untrammelled views on the people generally.
Redrafting starts with a draft document suitable for wide distribution. My Australian version is available at https://bosmin.com/ICS/CIR-Australia.pdf.
Reply
Jerry Krause
| #
Hi Robert,
Do you really believe that the present problem will be solved by a different form of government?
Have a good day, Jerry
Reply
Robert Beatty
| #
Hi Jerry,
The historical facts tell us it has worked before.
What do you suggest?
Reply
Jerry Krause
| #
Hi Robert,
I suggest that one uses good SCIENCE. In the past you did an analysis to predict something starting with a “model” of the earth in which you averaged the observed (accepted) distances of the earth’s surface at the poles and atvthe equator. I pointed out to you that made your model of the earth a perfect sphere. And you dismissed the fact that I had pointed to. BAD SCIENCE!
Einstein is said to have stated: “Make everything as simple as possible, but not simpler.” It is a too common practice of many to average measured data to make it simpler. Better to also state the maximum and minimum values of the data being averaged. Because these max and min are actual measured data.
Have a good day, Jerry
Reply
Robert Beatty
| #
Good science often starts by looking at the historical facts.
God bless you Jerry, but I am afraid your memory has the wrong Robert.
Reply
Saeed Qureshi
| #
Robert:
Difficult to argue with your view. I tend to agree with it. However, my worry is, will the nations survive before the change comes? Any thoughts from a historical perspective?
Reply
Robert Beatty
| #
Hi Saeed,
“will the nations survive before the change comes? Any thoughts from a historical perspective?”
The only occasion anarchy has resulted in a form of bottom-up government is in Switzerland in 1291 (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Federal_Charter_of_1291) when a Federal Charter was adopted following a period of insurrection. Since then Switzerland has survived through the decades, by adopting a style of direct democracy supported by CIR written into their constitution.
This is an extremely rare example and is unique from what I can tell. Other periods of insurrection have resulted in another form of top-down government, also with limited life. We only get one chance in a top-down democracy to change this and that is at a general election – assuming it is a reasonably fare vote. Change can only occur when both major parties are following unpopular policies. In Australia that is now. Both major parties achieved less than 40% of the vote, and are governing with the support of ‘Independents’. This situation provides an opportunity for a minor party to get a ‘rails run’ by promoting election material saying “we actively support CIR”. If this deliberately obscure message has the desired effect, (which is to start a conversation on what CIR involves) it will result in a minor party holding the balance of power.
It is a long shot, but the alternative is too horrendous to accept without a fight. Your thoughts always welcome.
Reply
Saeed Qureshi
| #
Hi Robert:
Thanks for your response. Greatly appreciated.
You have already hinted at my worry by saying, “assuming it is a reasonably fare vote.” For the past few years, suggestions have been made of not being a fair vote. As a result, we may have passed the stage of peaceful change and headed toward a ruinous state.
I hope I am wrong and some help comes to get the nations out of this darkness. Ameen!
Reply
Robert Beatty
| #
Hi Saeed,
In the case of the US, I think the best place to start would be to draft a new constitution document. I see a panel approach as being preferable. The panel of nine to include two recognised constitutional lawyers, a noted Swiss national, and six balanced personalities representing “we the people.” The aim would be to have the draft available for public discussion before the 2024 election.