Leading Russian Scientist Predicts Global Cooling Begins In 2030
A top polar scientist interviewed by the Russian Academy of Sciences says we need to prepare for serious global cooling, to begin by 2030-2035, citing studies of Lake Baikal and historic climate epochs
“One of the world’s top Arctic scientist’s has spoken out to debunk the ‘climate crisis’ narrative” and warns the public that “the Earth is actually about to enter a period of ‘global cooling.’”
According to leading polar scientist Andrey Fedotov (pictured) of the Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences (RAS), “the warming is about to end” and “The Earth is about to enter an ‘ice age.’”
Cooling starts in 2030
The period of “unfavorable cold” will begin around 2030. Fedotov issued the warning in a statement published by the RAS, the country’s leading scientific institution.
Fedotov said the warming is about to end and the cause is not humans. The Russian scientist says the cooling will be brought on by solar activity.
Natural cycles
“Currently, we are in a favorable period, but we will inevitably transition to an unfavorable [cold] one … around 2030-2035,” Fedotov said, citing his studies of Lake Baikal and historic climate epochs.
“When the ice age comes, you will feel it immediately,” he warns.
Prepare for cold!
He is urging the public to make preparations as such levels of cold would have a severe impact on the global food supply.
The following are excerpts of the interview between Fedotov and the Russian Academy of Sciences:
Russian Academy of Sciences (RAS): “In other words, what awaits us is not warming, but cooling. When?”
Andrey Fedotov: “Now we are in a prosperous period, but let’s move on to a disadvantaged one.” […]“It’s inevitable. According to my estimates, the transition should occur in 2030–2035.”
RAS: “So the Ice Age has already arrived, but we haven’t felt it yet?”
Fedotov: “No. When it comes, you will feel it immediately.”
RAS: “And what should be done now? Prepare felt boots, warm clothes, heaters?”
Fedotov: “I would start with food. Hungry in felt boots won’t last long.”
See more here notrickszone.com
Header image: Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences
Please Donate Below To Support Our Ongoing Work To Defend The Scientific Method
PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL, legally registered in the UK as a company 
incorporated for charitable purposes. Head Office: 27 Old Gloucester Street, London WC1N 3AX.
Trackback from your site.
Robert Beatty
| #
Andrey Fedotov may well be right. However, the cooling period could be sooner than 2030. My prediction is that world cooling will be undeniable by 2025. Either way, we need to take precautions now. The COP28 event gets the world looking in the wrong direction.
My thoughts on this important topic are at https://principia-scientific.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/03/global-cooling-beatty.pdf
Reply
Jerry Krause
| #
Hi Robert,
I used the hink to your 14 page PROM article and began scan it until I reached Figure 3. A graph where the horizontal axis is time because the time unit is k years (1000 years). No units are given for the vertical axis. So because the issue is cooling, I assume it is some unit of temperature. So I have no idea what the scale of temperature unit might be.
But this does not matter for we historically know that the thermometer was only invented about four tenths of a kyear ago. So any ploted lines after this time have to be pure fiction of some one’s imagination.
Have a good day.
Reply
Robert Beatty
| #
Hi Jerry,
The vertical axis in Figure 3 record specific events described in the Milankovitch Cycle. There is no need for quantitative values in such a plot.
Reply
Jerry Krause
| #
Hi Robert,
I read “Cycles also play key roles in Earth’s short-term weather and long-term climate. A century ago, Serbian scientist Milutin Milankovitch hypothesized the long-term, collective effects of changes in Earth’s position relative to the Sun are a strong driver of Earth’s long-term climate, and are responsible for triggering the beginning and end of glaciation periods (Ice Ages).” (Alan Ruiz, NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory).
Key words–“a century ago”. At least a century ago there were thermometers so the issue becomes that we know that the weather (atmospheric temperature) at any given location can quantitatively vary greatly (significantly) from one year to the next. And I do not believe you can sweep this measured fact under a qualitative rug.
And you have just admitted that all the lines of Figure 3 are based upon the reasoning (hypothesis) of Milutin Milankovitch (one person, no many persons after he demonstrated the ‘power’ of his reasoning.
Have a good day
Reply
Robert Beatty
| #
Hi Jerry,
You are obviously having difficulty interpreting Figure 3. The closest the figure gets to representing temperature is the last “stages of glaciation” where the note hot and cold are added. The extra information is shaded in grey to show when the world was hot. It is up to the reader to decide which components of the cycle are most responsible for the hot periods (and the opposite, or cold periods). My guess is that eccentricity is a major driver for hot periods. What do you think?
Reply
Jerry Krause
| #
Hi Robert,
El Niño events have no observed cyclic period (pattern) And during a El Niño event normal weather worldwide does not occur. Go to this link (https://www.ucdavis.edu/news/andean-farmers-accurately-time-rains-planting-stars) and read how potato farmers of the Andes learned how to predict El Niño events about 6 months in advance. by observing the star constellation Pleiades.
In Figure 3 are the possible causes of El Niño events considered?
Have a good day
Reply
Robert Beatty
| #
Hi Jerry,
The El Niño events are much shorter cycles than the Milankovitch Cycles, and IMO probably associated with the expanding earth.
It is interesting to take a hard boiled egg and knock the shell off the dome end. Then blow into the shell. The egg shell usually cracks down one side – similar to the mid Atlantic ridge. See http://www.bosmin.com/PSL/PlanetsSatellitesLandforms.pdf
Reply
Koen Vogel
| #
I agree the global temperature will inevitably cool again, but two comments:
1) If he wants to use local (Lake Baikal) data to make predictions about global climate change then we’ll need more than his say-so
2) Global climate “epochs” have been studied extensively by numerous workers. What does he know that they don’t?
And his new ice age prediction: this is just climate alarmism in reverse. If he’s looked at previous epochs then he’ll have seen that humanity will be just fine.
Reply
Daan Osinga
| #
I couldn’t agree more. Maybe he might mean an outbreak of the polar vortex
although one couldn´t fore see this so far ahead.
Reply