Lawyer Takes on DOD Vax Mandates, Explores Patents on HUMANS
The Biden administration’s vaccine mandates purporting to force U.S. military members to take the experimental Covid injections are unconstitutional.
Because of the potential for genetic changes, this may have implications involving patents and intellectual property, super lawyer Todd Callender tells The New American magazine’s Alex Newman in this episode of Conversations That Matter.
To protect the U.S. military, the rights of troops, and the U.S. Constitution, Callender has joined forces with other attorneys such as Tom Renz to sue the Department of Defense.
The case is beyond fascinating, and you won’t want to miss this powerful interview.
See more here: rumble.com
Please Donate Below To Support Our Ongoing Work To Expose The Lies About COVID19
PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL, legally registered in the UK as a company 
incorporated for charitable purposes. Head Office: 27 Old Gloucester Street, London WC1N 3AX.
Trackback from your site.
Frank S.
| #
Much of what Mr. Callender claims may seem “fringe”, or “over-the-top”. But nowadays, given the life or death nature of this whole subject, it seems more prudent to be cautiously discerning, rather than callously dismissive.
Reply
Mark Tapley
| #
Hello Frank S.
What good are patents based on nothing but Insilco (imaginary) genome fragments. Calleder, just like Uber lawyer Fulmrich (as are all of the legal and medical “experts” getting media attention) are merely providing cover for the facf that no virus has ever been isolated, purified nor verified. This legal jargon as well as the fake tests also serve to cover the fact that no real samples of the fake covid have ever been or ever will be extracted from either animal or human. Its all just another smoke screen. Just sit back and let the lawyers handle everything in the fake courts and most of all, just keep believing in the fake virus.
Reply
Richard Noakes
| #
The Hydrogel patent US8415325B2 is listed in the Moderna patent, here. Hydrogels are also mentioned in a second Moderna patent, here. Hydrogel is listed in the Johnson & Johnson patent, here. Hydrogels are made from Graphene Oxide. Nobody can deny the evidence that Graphene Oxide is in the shots.
GMO HUMANS
All the Covid-19 “vaccine” patents mention gene deletion. All the patents except one, mention “complimentary DNA” (cDNA). cDNA is a chimeric mRNA cocktail that’s being coded into Human cells using artificial genetic sequences in cross-species genomics.
According to the US Supreme Court ruling in 2013, altering Humans with cDNA makes them patent eligible. The court documents show that cDNA is made using modified bacterium and Supreme Court judges ruled it patent eligible. This means that a plant, animal or Human, could be patented and owned if first genetically modified with cDNA.
Mark Steele summarized it perfectly by stating:
In the US, the Supreme Court has ruled that vaccinated people worldwide are products, patented goods, according to US law, no longer human. Through a modified DNA or RNA vaccination, the mRNA vaccination, the person ceases to be human and becomes the OWNER of the holder of the modified GEN vaccination patent, because they have their own genome and are no longer “human” (without natural people), but “trans-human”, so a category that does not exist in Human Rights. The quality of a natural person and all related rights are lost. This applies worldwide and patents are subject to US law.
Since 2013, all people vaccinated with GM-modified mRNAs are legally trans-human and legally identified as trans-human and do not enjoy any human or other rights of a state, and this applies worldwide, because GEN-POINT technology patents are under US jurisdiction and law, where they were registered.”
See link here: https://ambassadorlove.wordpress.com/2021/12/08/covid-19-patent-horrors/
Reply
Mark Tapley
| #
Hello Noakes:
And what a bunch of crap you have written. Hydrogels are not made from graphene oxide but are lipids that may be used to coat drugs for delivery. The Supreme court ruling Prohibits patents on naturally occurring genes but only protects genetically produced genetic material, contrary to what social media has claimed.
Reply