Last Saturday’s Campaign for Freedom March in Oxford
We had an excellent turn-out at yesterday’s Campaign for Freedom in Oxford. The date was Saturday, February 18th.
Those in attendance were demonstrating against the local council’s proposed plan to divide Oxford into six ‘15 minute’ districts à la so-called Smart Cities of the future.
Of course, this isn’t really Oxfordshire County Council’s own plan, and it’s not simply local either.
No, the ‘Smart City’ phenomenon is global and because I don’t want to keep caveating the term with scare quotes throughout this article, I’m going to call them what they really are intended to be by design, which is Enslavement Cities.
And, no, I’m not joking. Nor am I exaggerating.
These Enslavement Cities are being driven top-down by tyrannical globalists who control the United Nations and its deeply sinister Sustainable Development Agenda. The latter is but one aspect of the UN’s over-arching 2030 Agenda.
If its long-stated goals are permitted to come to pass, the 2030 Agenda promises to turn the world on its head and soon make the lives and liberties that many of us took for granted not long ago virtually unrecognizable and maybe even all but forgotten within a generation.
Big Tech is comprehensively invested in this Enslavement City business, as are the world’s leading tyrannical asset management firms, major financial houses, and many other large corporations. Why?
What interest do Big Tech et al have in designing and determining how we all live, and without our say, no less? Well, as it turns out, quite a lot, actually. (Read Shoshana Zuboff for a crash course on this or read Patrick Wood’s Technocracy to learn how so-called Smart Cities are projected to be a $2.4 trillion dollar industry in the foreseeable future.)
Of course, if you watched Vera Sharav’s extraordinary documentary, Never Again is now Global, this should come as no surprise, as you will already know that many large American corporations helped fund both Hitler’s rise and the Nazi Holocaust – actively, knowingly, and deliberately.
These guilty corporations include several household names that persist as going concerns to this very day, including IBM, General Motors, and the Ford Motor Company, to name but a few. They also included several monopolists who were obsessed with eugenics, such as John D. Rockefeller and Henry Ford.
In this respect, today’s Bill Gates, whose fingerprints are on everything, including Enslavement Cities, is a near perfect carbon copy of these monsters past. Gates will be the first to profess affinity and admiration for the Rockefeller family and its foundation.
Returning to today’s Enslavement City plans, here in the UK, both Oxford and Canterbury are the tip of this particular totalitarian spear. The respective residents of these counties, who have been given, and will be given, no legitimate democratic say in the matter, are the chosen lab rats.
But make no mistake, Enslavement Cities are making advances all over the world. They, and internment camps (yes, really, camps are already with us too, but that’s for another post), are part of an even much larger agenda being perpetrated on us all by our globalist cabal.
This agenda has been in the works for decades, largely behind the scenes, but it went into overdrive, stepped out into plain sight, and became truly global in early 2020.
If the globalist psychopaths behind this agenda are not sufficiently challenged through mass uprisings, an Enslavement City will be headed your way in a matter of years, if not already.
Whereas stated plans in both Oxford and Canterbury are so openly brazen and therefore much easier to see through, London, with its expanding ULEZ regime, has been effectively captured in stealth already.
Most of London’s residents, of which I am one, hardly noticed our future digital prison being built up around us. If we did, we completely misunderstood what was happening. Sure, when the city’s first congestion charge scheme was implemented under former Mayor Ken Livingston in 2003, it was highly controversial.
However, concerns were mostly about financial costs to drivers and commercial impacts to businesses within the zone. There were seemingly good arguments on both sides. In favor of the congestion charge, was the fact that congestion was a legitimate concern.
Furthermore, according to government data, which at the very least seemed credible at the time, air pollution was (and presumably remains) a serious problem that was contributing to thousands of early deaths annually.
However, very few of us stopped to consider the implications of the mass surveillance, enabled by supercomputing, powerful algorithms, and tens of thousands of additional CCTV cameras in a city already widely recognized as one of the most surveilled in the world; or the degree of control and potential to perpetrate hinderances and harms on our lives that were inherent in all of this.
As one who has spent his entire career in technology, I am ashamed to admit, I did not see the risks either. I guess that’s because I used to trust the media and at least the intentions of governments in those days.
Fast forward to the present, and the precedent that the initial congestion zone set has made it easy for officials to keep expanding it, in cost, size, and scope, without reasonable justification or meaningful consultation.
Now we have ULEZ, the Ultra Low Emission Zone, which will soon have enveloped the entire city. Today’s ULEZ means that those with diesel fuelled vehicles must pay the local government £15 a day to drive their cars anywhere.
Never mind that it was the UK Government, no doubt bribed by corrupt German automobile manufacturers, which went whole hog on promoting ‘new diesel technology’ as environmentally friendly in the first place, and is therefore directly responsible for the proliferation of diesel vehicles across the UK.
People have been duped into believing that cutting Co2 is necessary to save the world. This is certainly true of most Londoners too. They do not know that this is in fact the single biggest ruse of all time, and one that puts them on a path to total subjugation and control by others.
Of course, ULEZ is a perfect divide-and-conquer strategy. The vast majority of Londoners don’t drive diesel vehicles and many of them already own or would like to own EVs. So they don’t bother to consider the implications, because they don’t think they’ll be effected. In this, they are foolish and sadly mistaken.
They don’t realise that the surveillance we’ve surrendered to with ULEZ gives the government power to outlaw all petrol based vehicles anytime they wish or that once everyone is then running on EVs, one tyrant’s thumb will eventually be able to grind us all to a halt – individually, in targeted groups, or en masse, at the push of a button or that algorithms will control where each of us can and cannot go as a matter of course.
These are some of the reasons so many of us were out demonstrating at Oxford yesterday.
Again, the good news there is that the turnout was excellent and the fight continues!
See more here substack.com
Please Donate Below To Support Our Ongoing Work To Defend The Scientific Method
PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL, legally registered in the UK as a company 
incorporated for charitable purposes. Head Office: 27 Old Gloucester Street, London WC1N 3AX.
Trackback from your site.