Janet Woodstock: The Eugenicist Who Approved The Pfizer Quackcine
I woke up this Tuesday morning and I had gained 300 followers overnight. I was baffled given my personalized algorithms are rigged for suppression. I dont have freedom of reach. UNLESS that is, someone with sway shares my content.
It took me hours to figure out how I’d gained nearly 800 new followers in less than 24 hours. Finally, I realized it was because Comedian Rob Schneider, whom I have connected with a few times, shared my 2021 tweet.
During a phone call back in February 2020, Google Whistleblower Zach Vorhies and I warned Rob that this coronavirus narrative was a psyop. We had woken up after a short-lived period of believing the Fear Porn. I was expecting this. I’ve been covering vaccine safety since 2012.
In Q4 2019, Zach would tease me, chanting “Medical Marshall Law, Mimi (my nickname).” But a year later, he was admitting I had been right.
In any case, I was searching my feed for a tweet Tuesday for Pfizer confidential documents that list the thousands of adverse reactions to the JibJab. I told Max Igan during my discussion with him this week, the although bizarre, ‘deja vu’ is on the list.
As I was searching, I came across an August 2021 Tweet where I wrote:
Meet Janet Woodstock, the lady (eugenicist) who approved the Pfizer quackcine (bioweapon) despite an overwhelming amount of adverse reactions and deaths. She also approved OxyContin (for as low as age 11) as well as fentanyl.
(I misspelled her name in the tweet. Her actual name is more apropos).
Woodcock‘s record shows she does not stand for the health of the people but rather HELLth. Once this bioweapon is on the children’s schedule, it will be nearly impossible to get it off.
The American physician served as Principal Deputy Commissioner of Food and Drugs, previously serving as Acting Commissioner of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). She joined the FDA in 1986 and has held several senior leadership positions. In 2015, Woodcock received a Lifetime Achievement Award from the Institute for Safe Medication Practices in recognition of “a significant career history of making ongoing contributions to patient safety.”
Operation Quack Hack & CDER
In March 2020, The FDA launched an operation they named Quack Hack. Ironic. It was headed by the Center for Drug Evaluation (CDER), a division of the FDA that regulates over-the-counter and prescription drugs, including biological therapeutics and generic drugs. CDER reportedly “performs an essential public health task by making sure that safe and effective drugs are available to improve the health of people in the United States.”
CDER employs around 1,300 employees in “review teams” that evaluate and approve new drugs. Additionally, CDER features a “safety team” with 72 employees to determine whether new drugs are unsafe or present risks not disclosed in the product’s labeling.
CDER was run by Dr. Janet Woodcock before she went on to lead the “therapeutic” initiative at Operation Warp Speed.
The FDA’s overall budget for approving, labeling, and monitoring drugs is roughly $290 million per year. Of that, the CDER’s safety team monitors the effects of more than 3,000 prescription drugs on 200 million people with a budget of about $15 million a year.
On April 12, 2021, Woodcock transitioned from her role as Director of CDER to Principal Medical Advisor to the Commissioner, while continuing to serve as Acting Commissioner. She served as the Director of CDER from 1994 to 2004 and 2007 to 2021.
CDER, currently run by Acting Director Dr. Patrizia Cavazzoni, oversees more than just medicines. For example, they consider fluoride toothpaste, antiperspirants, dandruff shampoos, and sunscreens as “drugs.” Who knew? And when did they start deeming nutrients like vitamin C as “drugs”?
Opioid Crisis
On Jan. 20, 2021, the Biden administration named Dr. Janet Woodcock acting commissioner of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA).
Later that month, a coalition of 28 public health groups and opioid crisis organizations sent a letter to the Biden Administration regarding Woodcock’s position as Acting Commissioner of the FDA. The letter said in part that “as the Director of the FDA’s CDER for more than 25 years, Woodcock presided over one of the worst regulatory agency failures in U.S. history.”
“In its opioid decision-making, Dr. Woodcock, and the division she supervised, consistently put the interests of opioid manufacturers ahead of public health, often overruling its scientific advisors and ignoring the pleas of public health groups, state Attorneys General, and outraged victims of the opioid crisis,” the letter said.
Examples of improper opioid decisions mentioned in the letter include “approving Opana without adequate evidence of safety or long-term efficacy, approving Zohydro despite a vote of 11-2 against approval by a scientific advisory committee, and approving promotion of OxyContin for children as young as 11 years old.”
As someone responded on Twitter,
Just another Margret Sanger.
Source: Substack
Please Donate Below To Support Our Ongoing Work To Defend The Scientific Method
PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL, legally registered in the UK as a company 
incorporated for charitable purposes. Head Office: 27 Old Gloucester Street, London WC1N 3AX.
Trackback from your site.
Tom
| #
…”CDER reportedly “performs an essential public health task by making sure that safe and effective drugs are available to improve the health of people in the United States.””… I guess that explains why the US is about the most unhealthiest nation on the planet. Over the last 60 years of increased drug use by US citizens, the health of the population has deteriorated exponentially.
Reply
Saeed Qureshi
| #
I provided a quote from Dr. Jannet Woodcok in our book “Slaying the Virus and Vaccine Dragon” concerning assessing the quality of pharmaceutical products, as follows:
“The working definition of monitoring pharmaceutical products’ quality could be, as noted by Janet Woodcock, acting Commissioner of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration:
The literature does not offer a consensus definition of quality of any product or service.
Although no unified FDA definition of drug quality for regulatory purposes has been
articulated, an operational definition can be discerned from an understanding of FDA
practices.
So, all medicinal products available on the market are assumed to be of quality because experts and, by extension, authorities say so, and the public has to accept them. No science-based standards or criteria are available in this respect but opinions.”
Therefore, similar definitions or processes for vaccines must have been applied too, i.e., in the authorities’ view, vaccines are of quality and safe. That all is needed to approve for products to become of quality.
Another important article in this respect would be (https://bioanalyticx.com/the-fda-committees-review-of-pfizer-biontech-covid-19-vaccine-unscientific-false-and-deceitful/)
Reply
Lorraine
| #
People are conditioned to accept, “because I said so”, from parents, teachers and other authority figures from childhood. When you are an adult you must expect answers not admonitions
Reply
Lorraine
| #
An after thought on the development of critical thinking in children is never answer their questions of, “why” with the thought oppressive answer, “because I, or anyone else said so” which is intended to shut down an inquisitive mind.
If we want to foster future healthy generations of independent thinkers and save the world from tyranny, it’s imperative to invest time and effort into researching answers to difficult questions. No authoritative admonishments based on nothing.
Reply