Italy Drastically Reduces Its Official COVID Death Toll Number
The Italian Higher Institute of Health has reduced the country’s official COVID death toll number by over 97 per cent after changing the definition of a fatality to someone who died from COVID rather than with COVID.
Italian newspaper Il Tempo reports that the Institute has revised downward the number of people who have died from COVID rather than with COVID from 130,000 to under 4,000.
“Yes, you read that right. Turns out 97.1 percent of deaths hitherto attributed to Covid were not due directly to Covid,” writes Toby Young.
Of the of the 130,468 deaths registered as official COVID deaths since the start of the pandemic, only 3,783 are directly attributable to the virus alone.
“All the other Italians who lost their lives had from between one and five pre-existing diseases. Of those aged over 67 who died, 7 percent had more than three co-morbidities, and 18 percent at least two,” writes Young.
“According to the Institute, 65.8 percent of Italians who died after being infected with Covid were ill with arterial hypertension (high blood pressure), 23.5 percent had dementia, 29.3 percent had diabetes, and 24.8 percent atrial fibrillation. Add to that, 17.4 percent had lung problems, 16.3 percent had had cancer in the last five years and 15.7 percent suffered from previous heart failures.”
The Institute’s new definition of a COVID death means that COVID has killed fewer people in Italy than (whisper it) the average bout of seasonal flu.
If a similar change were made by other national governments, the official COVID death toll would be cut by a margin of greater than 90 per cent.
Don’t expect many others to follow suit though, given that governments have invested so much of their authority in hyping the the threat posed by the virus.
For example, behavioral psychologists in the UK worked with the state to deliberately “exaggerate” the threat of COVID via “unethical” and “totalitarian” methods of propaganda in order to terrify the public into mass compliance.
And it worked.
A survey conducted after the first lockdown found that the average Brit thought 100 times more people had died from COVID than the official death toll.
Now we come to understand that the official killed ‘by COVID’ and not ‘with COVID’ figure is less than one tenth what is officially reported as the total COVID death toll.
Despite the change, Italy may yet take the decision to make the COVID-19 vaccine mandatory, although how such a scheme would be imposed remains unspecified.
See more here: summit.news
Header image: Pharma Boardroom
Bold emphasis added
Editor’s note: To see the equivalent figures for the UK, open https://www.england.nhs.uk/statistics/statistical-work-areas/covid-19-daily-deaths/weekly-total-archive/
Click the most recent week, and it opens an Excel spreadsheet. Click on Tab 3 – Deaths by condition. It should look like this:
Look at the column marked ‘NO’. That is the number of deaths for which the virus could have been the only cause. The latest figure for the UK as of October 28th is 4185, not the 141,000, which Worldometer and the BBC incorrectly shows.
Please Donate Below To Support Our Ongoing Work To Expose The Lies About COVID19
PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL, legally registered in the UK as a company 
incorporated for charitable purposes. Head Office: 27 Old Gloucester Street, London WC1N 3AX.
Trackback from your site.
ЯΞ√ΩLUT↑☼N
| #
It’s exactly as I calculated over a year ago based on what I was seeing. Many cases of cause of death in many countries are still being fought where by mere dint of categorisation a car crash victim becomes a Bullshit-19 death because he tested positive 2 months prior etc. Hospitals have also been handed lots of cash for every Bullshit-19 death listed. Just like the climate fraud, follow the money. It’s no different.
Reply
Kim H
| #
CDC stats also include anyone who died who tested positive after death. Which brings up the validity of the PCR tests. The invetor of the tests says they were never intended to diagnose disease, and should not be used that way because the results are directly tied to the number of cycles the sample is put through, with each cycle increasing the sample. Notice that there is NO public information about the cycles of the PCR tests currently relied on to make very big decisions based on “cases.” The YouTube video link below includes information from a NY Times article saying that HALF of WA state “cases” would have been negative instead of positive if the PCR threshold had cut off at 30 cycle thresholds instead of continuing to replicate what may have been a minuscule and non-infectious amount of the virus. “Tests with thresholds so high (40+) may detect not just live virus but also genetic fragments, leftovers from infection that pose no particular risk — akin to finding a hair in a room long after a person has left, Dr. Mina said.”
Here’s the NYTimes article:
https://www.nytimes.com/2020/08/29/health/coronavirus-testing.html
Reply
Saeed Qureshi
| #
In the next attempt, the number will be lower, nearer to the reality/truth (https://bioanalyticx.com/covid-deaths-as-per-science/)
Reply
James
| #
In Italy population is about 60 million, so must guess about 600 000 die per year, since many live to over 90; 1650 per day. Currently we have 30-50 CV “related” deaths per day: so it’s one of the smallest, after diabetes, cancer, heart, drinking, smoking, obesity. None of which are mentioned by the daily rags. Maybe only because not contagious; or don’t sell so well.
Reply