Is Critical Thinking a Good or Bad Thing?
Most people would probably think that this is a foolish question — how can critical thinking be a bad thing? Let’s back up a bit, and you’ll see the issue…
Point #1 is that — by FAR — the biggest fear of those on the Left is to have critical-thinking citizens.
Competent citizens who think for themselves are anathema to the Left in achieving its goals of undermining America.
Instead what the Left wants is conforming citizens. Conforming means citizens who:
1) go along with what is currently politically correct,
2) unquestionably follow the advice of “experts,”
3) accept the consensus view of matters,
4) support the conclusions of computer programs,
5) buy into one-sided “facts”, etc., etc.
The tsunami now overtaking us is artificial intelligence (AI). The applications and implications of AI are literally unfathomable. The number one defense against this reality distortion is Critical Thinking.
The Left wants citizens to be easily manipulated by AI, so (again) they are adamantly opposed to Critical Thinking.
Point #2: Critical Thinking is a skill set. Some of this can be learned by those who are keenly observant, but by and large, it needs to be formally taught — just like what is needed to be a quality golfer, an accomplished chef, a productive scientist, etc.
Point #3: the most appropriate K-12 subject area for teaching the specifics of how to be a genuine Critical Thinker, is Science. The reason is that real scientists are instinctively skeptical, so they ask a lot of questions — why? when? how? Asking good questions is an essential element of being a true Critical Thinker.
Point #4: in 49 states the accepted K-12 Science standards are the Next Generation Science Standards (NGSS). This was written by a group of progressives, so the phrase “critical thinking” does not appear in the NGSS!
Point #5: worse, the NGSS instead teaches the direct opposite of Critical Thinking: that citizens should be compliant and submissive (see above Point #1).
Point #6: for the first time a meaningful alternative to the NGSS was just introduced (see 6-18-24 webinar). It’s called the K-12 Franklin Science Standards. Kudos to the National Association of Scholars (NAS) for taking on this yeoman task!
Point #7: regretfully the Franklin Standards do not promote Critical Thinking!
Point #8: on the other hand the Franklin Standards do not propagandize students into compliance — so that’s a very good thing!
Point #9: the reason cited as to why the Franklin Standards do not promote Critical Thinking, is that a few woke extremists have supposedly categorized “Critical Thinking” as being an indicator of oppression by white people!
Point #10: since I never heard that fake connection, I researched it — and could not find it anywhere. The closest I could come up with was here, where it says that “objective, rational, linear thinking” is a white value: similar but not the same.
Point #11: even if Critical Thinking is labeled as a “white value,” does that mean we should abandon it, so we don’t offend someone? NO! (See here.) There are several reasons why:
a) 99± percent of teachers, students, scientists, and the public are unaware of this phony claim — so it makes no sense to change doing what’s right.
b) Even those who are aware of the perversion of this phrase should not be bullied into abandoning a powerful concept — which is what our enemies want.
c) Once we’ve allowed ourselves to be intimidated, it will not end. For example, the same people who oppose Critical Thinking also oppose the Scientific Method. Do we also go along with eliminating that (as the NGSS has done)?
d) The Left is purposefully causing confusion about Critical Thinking, as that is one of their most proven methods of mind control (see here).
e) Confusion about the meaning can be avoided by carefully defining “Critical Thinking” in the Franklin Standards, or wherever it is taught.
Point #12: when confronted with Leftists objecting to any reasonable terminology, we should politely but firmly hold the line, making no concessions.
The Takeaway
Of all the Left’s many attacks being made on America, a strong case can be made that this is the most problematic — as well as the least discussed!
Carefully consider the fact that there are some 4 MILLION US high school graduates every year.
Now consider that most of those graduates will shortly become voting citizens.
How long can America survive when 4± MILLION propagandized, non-critically thinking citizens are added to the voting rolls every year?
For this reason alone, Critical Thinking is extraordinarily essential to be properly taught to our children.
On a more positive note, there are many other rewards for being a Critical Thinker! This is a powerful list of just some of the MANY fabulous benefits.
The bottom line is that any K-12 education program (particularly Science standards) that does not properly teach Critical Thinking is an abject failure.
Here are other materials by this scientist that you might find interesting:
Check out the Archives of this Critical Thinking substack.
WiseEnergy.org: discusses the Science (or lack thereof) behind our energy options.
C19Science.info: covers the lack of genuine Science behind our COVID-19 policies.
Election-Integrity.info: multiple major reports on the election integrity issue.
See more here substack.com
Header image: LinkedIn
Please Donate Below To Support Our Ongoing Work To Defend The Scientific Method
PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL, legally registered in the UK as a company 
incorporated for charitable purposes. Head Office: 27 Old Gloucester Street, London WC1N 3AX.
Trackback from your site.
Greg Spinolae
| #
Alternative hypothesis:
Critical Thinking CANNOT “be taught”.
Critical Thinking is no more a “skill-set” than “intelligence”.
Critical Thinking is a Phenotypal Marker of an emerging humanoid species that is in the process of EVOLVING from Homo-sapiens to Homo-sapientis.
Reply
Realist
| #
“Critical Thinking is no more a “skill-set” than “intelligence”.”
I do agree with your statement, but just as with intelligence, one can learn to apply/utilize their genetic advantage
Reply
Alan
| #
Why limit this to the left? Any politician is the same and it also applies to anybody or organisations that want you to buy something or take an action they prefer.
Reply
Howdy
| #
Have you ever looked at stocism? It revolves around a set way of thinking that is supposed to be ‘better’ for you. Makes you better than others. So why is it different to say, Buddhism, Hinduism, Taoism? Or another ancient practice, the most recent variation on a theme I’ve come across, which is toltec, and the four agreements.
Now add critical thinking, and you notice the pattern? All expect you to learn to think in a way that is alien to how one actually thinks. You give up your own rules and ways to conform to another’s way of doing things.
This apparently makes one ‘authentic’. Carl jung can point you to the right direction on that one. Except when you look at it, you are simply trading your own self, for an ideal self, but in another’s eyes.
Exhibit A:
1) go along with what is currently politically correct,
2) unquestionably follow the advice of “experts,”
3) accept the consensus view of matters,
4) support the conclusions of computer programs,
5) buy into one-sided “facts”, etc., etc.
Above, you see, there’s no change from anything else that is forced? The difference here is that people take up this alien practice willingly, all on the say so of another, with benefits promised down the line.
Self delusion is it’s name, and it’s more powerfull presently, than ever.
Reply
Tom
| #
Forgot thinking for yourself and go with the crowd and let government think for you. After all aren’t the smartest retards working for government? Leftists surely fit the bill.
Reply