Iowa Wind Farm Completely Devastated…by High Winds

A handful of wind turbines in southwest Iowa belonging to the energy company MidAmerica suffered immense damage May 21 after a tornado blew through the area, overwhelming the ‘green’ energy producers, according to KGAN-TV in Cedar Rapids

Video footage captured the wreckage of the destroyed turbines, homing in on one that caught fire and filled the air with black smoke.

The drone images from storm chaser Jordan Hall were shared by MyRadar Weather on X.

“We’re thankful no one in the area was injured by the turbine collapses,” MidAmerica spokeswoman Tina Hoffman said in a statement, according to KGAN.

“Our thoughts are with those in nearby Greenfield who lost their lives, as well as the many others who were hurt or lost their homes due to the same severe storm outbreak,” she said.

The powerful EF4 tornado tore through the town, killing four and injuring 35 others, according to the Des Moines Register.

The turbines, just north of nearby Prescott, recorded wind speeds over 100 mph before the sensors began to fail, KGAN reported.

While these white behemoths are designed to take numerous types of weather, they face certain limitations.

“Few structures can withstand a direct hit by a powerful tornado such as what we experienced on Tuesday,” Hoffman said.

Unfortunately, those limitations are something that ‘green’ energy advocates are simply going to have to live with.

Every form of ‘renewable’ energy comes with a cost.

Of course, all of them rely on batteries, which are nonrenewable, but even outside of that, solar farms need immense land and maintenance, wind turbines can succumb to immense storms, and so on.

Liberals don’t seem to be aware of the drawbacks of ‘green’ energy, carrying a belief that as long as it isn’t oil and gas, it has no flaws.

Drawbacks are far from something to completely scrap the ideas over as they can have immense positives to them.

As The New York Times reported, Iowa got about two-thirds of its electricity from ‘renewable’ resources in 2022, with almost all of it from wind farms.

But when considering these options, the full list of positives and negatives needs to be considered rather than just hyper-focusing on the aspect that best serves an agenda.

See more here westernjournal.com

Header image: WFXR

Please Donate Below To Support Our Ongoing Work To Defend The Scientific Method

PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL, legally registered in the UK as a company incorporated for charitable purposes. Head Office: 27 Old Gloucester Street, London WC1N 3AX. 

Trackback from your site.

Comments (4)

  • Avatar

    Howdy

    |

    I guess it’s no surprise a generator could be destroyed by a tornado, but why build something so inclined to suffer from destructive wind, in a tornado area?

    Reply

  • Avatar

    Tom

    |

    Oops!…another example of the law of unintended consequences rearing its head. This is something the global warming freaks never consider.

    Reply

  • Avatar

    Wisenox

    |

    Well, they obviously aren’t going run their data centers off renewables. So what are they going to use if not renewables, and why would the people need to be on renewable if it is so bad?

    Reply

  • Avatar

    Lorraine

    |

    Tell us, what are the positives associated with these green ideas you are talking about. They’re far from long term investments since they degrade and deteriorate over time and can be completely destroyed by natural disasters in areas where they’re put to use. Plus they’re bird grinding machines and the vibrations in the ocean waters seem to be affecting sea life, particularly whales. Not to mention they’re subject to ice and freezing conditions that render them useless.
    Go ahead, I’m listening.

    Reply

Leave a comment

Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment.
Share via