[INTERVIEW] 90 Sudden or Unexpected Canadian Doctor Deaths — Dr. William Markis
Ninety Canadian doctors have died suddenly or unexpectedly since the rollout of the dangerous and ineffective Covid-19 mRNA “vaccines,” according to the research of Dr. William Makis, MD.
90.
…Without any investigation by the organization saddled with protecting its physician members, the Canadian Medical Association (CMA).
Shockingly and to the contrary, the CMA has instead publicly stated on social media that Dr. Makis’ work is dangerous “disinformation” and ignored two open letters of concern with research findings from Dr. Makis. (See letters below.)
Compared to the number of deaths pre-Covid jabs in 2019-2020, the number of deaths in 2021-2022 is exploding.
Join us for this explosive interview where Dr. Makis reveals disturbing trends within the 90 deaths, a major mechanism of vaccine injury and death, the Canadian Medical Association’s conflicted dismissal of the deaths, mainstream media collusion, and the attacks on Dr. Makis himself for bringing such important information to the world.
The mainstream media will not bring you these reports. WATCH:
Read rest at Bright Light News
Trackback from your site.
Tom
| #
This is an excellent interview.
Reply
Joe
| #
Excellent article. After doing an internet search on these Doctors I have found that the Doctors in the article DID die as per the article
Reply
Welter
| #
Dr Louise Feddema, whose name is on the list died by suicide. That’s just one. Your research like Dr Makis is flawed.
Reply
Allan Shelton
| #
Why is that the CMA is not being sued?
Then they would have to defend their claims with proof.
Likewise the plaintiffs would present their evidence.
Maybe then we would be getting somewhere.
Reply
TINP
| #
It only takes a bit of research to find out that the Canadian Medical Association is a voluntary organization, with a federal incorporation since 1905 for that purpose. It is not “saddled with protecting its physician members”.
Medical professionals are free to join the CMA but are not compelled to join. If they do join, and if they die while a member, the CMA will give them a short obituary on their “In Memoriam” page out of courtesty to the family. If they don’t join, the CMA has no legal or membership duties in their regard, and certainly no legal obligation to register or answer for the deaths of all doctors in Canada. And if the CMA deletes old In Memoriam pages from its web site, they are more likely saving web space by removing outdated names of deceased members rather than colluding in some sinister purpose aimed at deception.
The CMA, as a national organization with a federal incorporation, has no legal authority over doctors in Canada because the provinces have the exclusive legal jurisdiction over doctors in each province.
Under the Constitution of 1867, the official state body with jurisdiction over doctors is the professional order created by provincial legislation. For every doctor whose death you wish to investigate, you would have to contact the appropriate provincial professional order.
If you want to have an official statement or official action concerning a doctor in Quebec, for example, you would have to deal with the professional order created by Quebec legislation. In this case, it is the “Collège des médecins du Québec” whose web site is here: http://www.cmq.org/home.aspx
Dr. Makis, in pointing to the CMA’s In Memoriam page and making volatile allegations about “deliberate” “deletions” and other defamatory allegations, is in fact spreading “dangerous” “disinformation” as the CMA is reported to have said.
It is too bad that Dr. Makis’s interviewers, who seem to consider themselves “independent news”, don’t bother to fact-check the basics before they publish spurious interviews and raise a hue and cry to no purpose.
Attacking the Canadian Medical Association for not doing something they are not legally incorporated nor authorized to do is a bit of a waste of time, and only serves to generate sensationalism to raise the profile of “alternative” “news” media run by people who don’t do their homework.
Reply
TINP
| #
Slight correction. The Canadian Medical Association was created by a “Special Act of Parliament” in 1909-05-19, not in 1905 as I had said above: https://bit.ly/3sE1qUC and the 2-page statute is available in an old federal statute book at archive.org: https://bit.ly/3W7Ec6Z
There is a copy of the current Act (as amended in August 2022) and Bylaws at the CMA web site:
https://www.cma.ca/cma-bylaws
Reply
Typhus
| #
Seems that if this Association is complicit in active obfuscation & characterization of the Patented Bioweapon c19 mRNA Injections, that the media and health agencies are also engaged in…and that can be proven, then they should suffer the legal & physical consequences.
Name the names involved. Are All of them WEF Academy Graduates???
I think you’ll discover another murderous connection there.
Also… FOLLOW THE MONEY~!
The totals of patented bioweapon injection caused deaths across the planet are accelerating during the current Flu season.
It appears that 5 billion folks will die by next year…if the fact of test animals dying immediately of anaphylaxis and then within 2 years of all of the same maladies that the multifaceted Bioweapon injection is currently manifesting in its human victims.
All of the myriad ways of thus dying were briefed by the FDA in October 2020.
Reply
TINP
| #
You obviously intended to reply to someone else, because you certainly didn’t read what I said before you posted your comment.
Reply
VOWG
| #
Suing any level of the medical profession in Canada is an exercise in futility. Very few have ever been successful.
Reply
VOWG
| #
So 90 deaths is misinformation. What do they call the 400,000 in the US?
Reply
TINP
| #
Nobody said that 90 deaths was misinformation. It has merely been pointed out that if deaths are deemed suspicious, i.e. “sudden and unexplained”, and seem to represent younger medical professionals, the correct organization to approach on the issue is the PROVINCIAL professional order, not the CMA, which has no legal authority over the medical profession in any province. There may well be a large number of “sudden and unexplained” young-doctor deaths in Canada, but the CMA isn’t the organization to approach to try to verify it, or to ask for action on it, as they have, as said above, no legal authority over Canadian doctors under the Constitution of Canada. The provinces have that authority.
Reply
TINP
| #
Dr. Makis, in that interview above, refers to the In Memoriam page of the Canadian Medical Association. Read my first comment above for context.
Not all doctors in Canada are CMA members. Therefore, the CMA In Memoriam page is not a register of the deaths of all doctors in Canada, nor is it legally required to be.
But, since Dr. Makis drew attention to the CMA In Memoriam page, implying that it proved young doctors have been dying in disproportionate numbers since the vaxx roll-out, it would be important to actually list the ages of the deceased CMA members currently reported there. All that is required to do that is to click on the “More” button beside each name, something Dr. Makis does not seem to have done.
This is the Canadian Medical Association “In Memoriam” page:
https://www.cma.ca/memoriam
On the day I first checked the stats a couple of weeks ago, the CMA had two long “In Memoriam” pages covering 2022 and no other year.
The listed deaths begin January 1, 2022 and end September 10, 2022. Today, 18 November 2022, deaths after September 10th are listed, and I’ve added the ages of those deaths at the very bottom of this list that notes the age at death of every doctor on those two In Memoriam pages.
I took notes on the very few that were “young”. It took me about 30 minutes to check these facts.
The ages collected indicate that the vast majority of deceased doctors on the CMA In Memoriam list for 2022 between January and October 12th, 2022 have lived to ripe old ages.
That doesn’t mean that young Canadian doctors aren’t dropping dead; it just means the CMA In Memoriam list doesn’t support that allegation; although combined lists from each provincial professional order, if available, might support the allegation, who knows. Someone has to do the homework.
Here are the ages at death of CMA members reported for 2022 to date, with “younger” deaths noted.
AGES:
81,
92,
74,
94,
101,
88,
74,
79,
76,
83,
72,
100,
92,
Simms, Kiri J. August 3, 2022 – 64,
95,
74,
78,
84,
94,
Buyting, Ryan July 26, 2022 – 26,
85,
104,
82,
80,
78,
70,
68,
91,
96,
Hannam, Paul D. July 16, 2022 – 50, “Died of sudden cardiac failure during a fun run”,
86,
69,
74,
71,
82,
95,
87,
75,
84,
Krahn, Murray July 1, 2022 – 65, “Died July 1, 2022, of glioblastoma multiforme”,
Van der Westhuizen, Andrew N. June 30, 2022 – 36, “Died June 30, 2022, following a cycling accident, aged 36.”,
Gayle, Barrington A. June 29, 2022 – 51,
68,
97,
92,
88,
94,
92,
87,
95,
70,
75,
96,
87,
80,
97,
69,
97,
89,
89,
Yoneda, Joshua May 16, 2022 – 27, “Died of cancer May 16, 2022”,
89,
Laverdière, David May 14, 2022 – 48,
78,
90,
91,
94,
93,
80,
67,
76,
74,
83,
92,
82,
73,
75,
92,
82,
85,
93,
95,
92,
77,
84,
83,
84,
Gottesman, Ronald D. April 8, 2022 – 64,
67,
89,
83,
87,
83,
63,
64,
88,
73,
72,
85,
69,
NEXT PAGE – 2nd of two,
89,
90,
85,
95,
87,
88,
79,
78,
97,
Mikael, Gaby G. March 17, 2022 – 51,
94,
Harris, Bradley J. March 14, 2022 – 49,
94,
96,
82,
84,
90,
93,
83,
93,
80,
93,
93,
82,
93,
92,
72,
97,
69,
66,
85,
91,
101,
72,
84,
71,
92,
98,
64,
98,
87,
75,
71,
87,
91,
83,
92,
97,
86,
89,
71,
87,
97,
80,
95,
94,
92,
90,
74,
89,
83,
100,
77,
77,
97,
79,
66,
91,
86,
73,
89,
78,
91,
74,
81,
73,
81,
79,
91,
86,
84,
88,
Burns, Jonathan A. January 6, 2022 – 56,
94,
83,
97,
90,
70,
65,
91,
93
DEATHS after 10 September 2022
81
84
74
88
88
86
83
86
74
92
END OF STORY.
I would like to point out that disinformation and sensationalism by self-proclaimed “alternative news” sources on matters of this gravity undermines legitimate efforts of careful researchers to call attention to the serious problems with the alleged pandemic and the injections given to billions of people world-wide. It helps the perpetrators to dismiss all non-“official” sources as “disinformation” and undermines efforts to get at the truth and help to save lives.
Reply
Typhus
| #
That Is True .
Reply
Allan Shelton
| #
Dr. Markis made a statement and TNIP countered it.
Excellent.
That is the objective of PSI as far as I know.
Reply
TINP
| #
Hello. It’s Dr. MAKIS and TINP. You got both names wrong.
Reply