Hydrogen Hype and Hurdles

Green Hydrogen is the latest “energy” fad from the global warming warriors. It is mainly hot air.

Hydrogen will NEVER be a source of energy. Unlike coal, oil or natural gas, hydrogen rarely occurs naturally – it must be manufactured, and that process consumes far more energy than the hydrogen “fuel” can recover. And the heat content of natural gas is over three times that of hydrogen.

“Hydro-gen” means “born of water”, but the first commercial fuel containing hydrogen was born of coal. Maybe it should be called “Carbo-gen”?

“Town Gas” was manufactured by heating coal to produce hydrogen, methane and oxides of carbon. The resultant mixture of flammable gases was used for street lighting and domestic heating and cooking. It was replaced by “clean coal by wire” (electricity).

Today’s hydrogen hype proposes using wind and solar energy to produce “green” hydrogen by electrolysis of water. But all green generators are unreliable and intermittent – they seldom produce rated capacity for more than a few hours. “Green hydrogen” would create a messy scatter of expensive equipment for panels, turbines, roads, power lines, electrolytic cells and specialised storage tanks and freighters – all to produce stop-start supplies of a tricky, dangerous new fuel. Risking capital in such ventures is best suited to unsubsidised and well-insured speculators.

There are other problems.

Australia is a huge dry continent. Burning hydro-carbons like coal, oil and gas releases plant-friendly CO2 and water into the atmosphere. (Every tonne of hydrogen in coal produces 9 tonnes of new water as it burns.)  However every tonne of green hydrogen extracted using electrolysis will remove over 9 tonnes of fresh surface water from the local environment. That water may be released to the atmosphere far away, wherever the hydrogen is consumed (maybe in another hemisphere). The tonnage of water thus removed (often from sunny dry outback areas) would be substantial.

Farmers whose water is already rationed will wake up one morning to see their grassy hills covered in wind turbines and power lines, their fertile flats smothered in solar panels, and a huge hydrogen generator draining their water supply. Not green at all.

Here is a stark picture of tomorrow in Australia: https://saltbushclub.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/07/hydrogen-hype.jpg
(Please feel free to publish this picture.)

And there are other dangers.

The hydrogen molecule is tiny, seeking any minute escape hole. Once it reaches the air, one small spark will ignite a violent explosion (once detonated, it burns ten times faster than natural gas). This makes storage and transport of hydrogen difficult, and the swift destruction of the Hindenburg illustrates the danger. It cannot be moved safely in natural gas pipelines and exporting it as a liquefied gas just wastes another 30 percent of the energy and adds another layer of cost, complexity and danger.

Using hydrogen for fuel cells in vehicles makes a bit more sense than promoting electric vehicles powered by massive flammable batteries made of rare metals. The battery car green dream faces huge costs and obstacles to generate the extra electricity, mine the battery metals, establish reliable battery charging stations all over the country and cope with battery disposal problems.

Hydrogen fuelled cars would improve city air quality at the vast expense of producing, handling and dispensing a dangerous gas. Hydrogen makes no sense for replacing petrol and diesel on country roads or farms.

 For hydrogen to replace coal, oil and gas would require immense quantities of hydrogen, needing large quantities of fresh water and huge quantities of reliable electricity to generate it.

So what’s best?

If there was a profitable market for electrolytic hydrogen it would be far more efficient to use coal, gas, hydro or nuclear power for continuous production of hydrogen in an area well supplied with fresh water. These same proven, reliable and abundant fuels are best suited to provide cheap reliable electricity and transport fuel for all factories, smelters, farms, vehicles, ships and planes.

Forget the global warming religion and get rid of intermittent wind and solar generators from the grid unless they provide their own backup generators. Cut their subsidies and let them use their intermittent energy to generate unsubsidised green hydrogen for sale to whoever will buy it.

Header image: Live Science

Please Donate Below To Support Our Ongoing Work To Defend The Scientific Method

PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL, legally registered in the UK as a company incorporated for charitable purposes. Head Office: 27 Old Gloucester Street, London WC1N 3AX. 

 

Trackback from your site.

Comments (4)

  • Avatar

    Saighdear

    |

    Aye, “using wind and solar energy to produce “green” hydrogen by electrolysis of water.” just look at ( as an example ) https://gridwatch.co.uk
    TODAY almost representative of past week or so, 1% of our power from Wind – and from that you expect spare capacity for making hydrogen?

    Reply

  • Avatar

    Charles Higley

    |

    YOU CANNOT BUILD A RELIABLE ENERGY SUPPLY FROM UNRELIABLE ENERGY SOURCES.

    Wind and solar are only useful at the end user, a farmer far from the grid who can lower dependency on the grid by having supplemental power some of the time.

    I just bought a 54 year-old sailboat with a diesel inboard engine. But, I am also adding 4 100W solar panels that can keep the battery bank toppled off most of the time. Never have to worry about using the lights, which are all LED now, or not being to start the diesel. To be practical, however, I might add a small 350 W gasoline generator, to stow away, for power needs under bad conditions.
    It’s the end user for which “green pigmented” energy is useful. The rest is all damage and waste to the environment and the people.

    Reply

    • Avatar

      Moffin

      |

      Hi Charles. Is the inboard a Yanmar? Are you going to fit a dive compessor and check out the Coral Sea.
      I have read a book called the circumnavigators which covers Slocum, Tilicum which was a fitted out hollowed out log that made the circumnavigation, a 6’7″ tall Englishman who nearly made it in a 12′ sloop but was lost in the Tasman Sea, some Kiwi Dr. who was pitchpoled 3 times ( turned end over end ) in the Southern Ocean and others.
      Back 50 years ago they reckoned the ” Tahitian Ketch ‘ was the most reliable vessel for sailing itself.
      Watch out for pirates, now called climate alarmists and vaccine mandaters. Enjoy the friendly winds.

      Reply

      • Avatar

        Mark Tapley

        |

        For most the old adage is true: There’s only two good days when owning a boat. The day you buy it and the day you sell it.

        Reply

Leave a comment

Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment.
Share via