How the World Became Convinced to Eat Insecticide

Written by Agent131711 on December 15, 2024. Posted in Current News

In May of 2024, I published an article called Ivermectin: Population Control Poison.

 In that piece, we looked at what exactly Ivermectin is and a brief history of how it came to be. Long story short: people in Africa who lived near certain bodies of water suddenly began developing symptoms; rash, skin discoloration and sometimes losing their eyesight.

This dis-ease was then named River Blindness and science concluded it must have to do with the food or water supply being poisoned biting flies that live on the river… the problem was proving it.

No matter how many studies they ran, they couldn’t prove the flies were causing infection. To plagiarize myself, “Because the monkey studies were unsuccessful, scientists switched to using other animals and methods. These new methods involved dorsal fins, removing slices of skin then keeping the skin alive to run wacky tests on it, centrifuging blood samples to try to find larvae, and more … that was when I stopped reading because it was pointless.”

The United Nations decided the solution to stopping River Blindness was to feed people hugely toxic medicines called Diethylcarbamazine and Suramin. Then the UN began poisoning the water to kill the people flies…

When poisoning the water didn’t stop the symptoms, the river-dwellers were told they must move away from the river, which ultimately destroyed their ability to flourish. It became known that Diethylcarbamazine and Suramin were causing serious harm, simultaneously, Big Pharma was searching for their next big hit.

Suddenly, out of the blue, a Merck contractor stumbled across a new deadly dirt bacteria in the soil of a golf course. The scientist brought it back to his lab where a chemically modified variation of it was developed. The new concoction was “25 times more potent” than any existing parasite medication… the new concoction was Abamectin (Ivermectin).

Ivermectin was originally peddled as a cure for animals, to save them from dangerous parasites (yet another tragic hoax based on decades worth of lies). The issue with it was, because it is insecticide (poison), it was killing animals. In fact, it was so good at killing animals that it became a way to euthanize them (just like “vitamins” which are also insecticides, herbicides and rodenticides).

Then, one day, it began being peddled as a human drug for killing our evil parasites, then it was peddled not only as cure, but also as way to prevent evil parasites. 

What people didn’t know was that there was substantial evidence that eating insecticide was causing serious harm in animals, even huge animals, and even in very tiny doses:

Quote, “Approximately 18 hours after administering the ivermectin paste, the owner noticed signs of depression, profuse salivation, and ataxia in all 4 limbs of horse 1 and the other 2 horses that received the same dewormer.”…

“When admitted to the hospital, horse 1 had hypersalivation, forelimb and hind limb ataxia, hypersensitivity to touch and sound, and bilateral mydriasis. Physical examination revealed tachycardia … Oral mucous membranes were pale and slightly tacky.” … “Clinical signs continued to progress in severity over the next 5 hours, and the mare began to head press, tremble, and have diffuse muscle fasciculations throughout the shoulder and gluteal regions.

It eventually became recumbent and unable to rise. The mare appeared blind and had signs of extreme agitation such that it was unsafe to approach and treat.

A decision was made to euthanize the mare on the basis of progressive neurologic deterioration and safety concerns for those providing veterinary care.” – yeah, a horse was fed Ivermectin then had a Central Nervous System attack and went blind…

It would turn out that they knew all along that this miracle cure, Ivermectin, was not a safe product. It was causing death, even in small studies.

And side effects were occurring at very tiny doses.

They also knew that when humans ate the poison insecticide, they too suffered from side effects, primarily rash, central nervous system attacks and blindness.

Yep, people were being fed an insecticide to stop parasites, which they were told are the cause of rash and blindness, yet the insecticide they were consuming was known to cause the identical symptoms it was supposed to prevent. Not only did this product cause these issues, but it was a known fertility reducing agent – this will become very important shortly.

Despite the chaos the insecticide was causing, millions of doses were being prescribed and gifted annually:

Now that you know what we covered in my first article on the topic, let’s pull back the curtain and see who is behind this scheme…

To understand why we began eating insecticide for our health, we have to rewind to 1969. In this year, Rockefeller’s Population Council published a document stating fertility rates must be plummeted so population growth can reach zero. Two of the main geographical areas of population concern were Africa and India.

The following year, in 1970, the United Nations Development Programme funded a WHO study in West Africa regarding River Blindness.

In 1971, a scientist from Japan traveled to the US to meet with other scientists including the head of Merck Research Laboratories.

He was then given money by the NIH and several large pharmaceutical companies ”to search for naturally occurring novel therapeutics”.

In 1972, the World Bank, United Nations and WHO held a joint meeting to discuss Phase 1 of the rollout of the River Blindness Partnership.

The year after, 1973, the Japanese scientist was contracted by Merck and quickly found the deadly dirt bacteria (although some claim he actually found the bacteria in 1971, either way, the timing was uncanny.)

In 1974, Phase 1 of the WHO/UN partnership began protecting 30 million people in 11 countries from River Blindness… by feeding them insecticide.

By the 1980s, fertility rates in across the world were suddenly plummeting, with Africa, shown in orange, taking the hardest hit:

In 1981, Ivermectin began being peddled by the UN and WHO as a preventative measure – now people in Africa should be eating it even when they are not ill.

In 1987, with the success shown in the Africa study, Ivermectin was given full approval to be used as a human drug. The same year, Merck established The Mectizan Donation Program in which it gifts Ivermectin for free. (Mectizan is the brand name of Merck’s Ivermectin).

…and this is where the timeline starts to get crazier than an HBO Max drama…

In 1994 a document was published by the United Nations Population and Development Division. This document was titled “Populati0n and Development in Africa, OAU & ECA” – if you think the zero in the word Population is a mistake, it is not, it is typed like that twice:

On Page 9 of the document, they write “The agriculture and economic stagnation impede the process of transition towards the lowering of fertility.”

In 1996 the World Bank published a file called Ivermectin Distribution. The documents within the file outline the Africa program and were written by Bob Pond, M.D from Decatur, Georgia:

Since there was no medical practice name associated with Dr. Pond, I wanted to look up 1301 Willivee Drive to see what I could find. I was expecting the address to be a fancy office or a giant healthcare complex, but to my surprise…

… it is this:

So this Dr. Pond, who created the details of the World Bank’s massive Ivermectin Distribution Program in Africa, was working out of a little house. Strange?

If we look at the file we see some incredibly interesting things. First, Dr. Pond was working for the World Bank on behalf of Merck. Second, he wanted to make sure the drug was going to people who were not sick and third, he was very concerned with pregnancy:

…and he was even more concerned with making sure every healthy person was consuming the insecticide and that nobody was able to take the pills away:

Keep Me Writing! Make a KoFi Donation

And just in case you’re thinking, “that’s because it was really helping people!”, here’s Merck’s Safety Data Sheet:

1997: 47 nursing home residents were given a single dose of Ivermectin, only 0.2 mg, for scabies. 15 of them died. That means roughly 1 out of every 3 who were fed the cure were executed by it.

In February of 2002, the US Senate Committee on Foreign Relations announced the Gates Foundation will help stop the spread of AIDS.

A few months later, in May, the Gates Foundation bought into Big Pharma:

As part of that purchase, the Gates Foundation became deeply involved with Merck.

The same year, the Fogarty International Center (NIH), the World Bank, WHO, and the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation initiated the Disease Control Priorities Project (DCPP).

Shortly after, in 2003, the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation got involved with Ivermectin:

In 2004, the World Bank published West Africa: Defeating River Blindness: Success in Scaling Up and Lessons Learned. Their document states, “600,000 cases of blindness have been prevented…” – to understand how they arrived at this number, we have to fast forward two years to:

2006: The International Bank for Reconstruction and Development / The World Bank published a document called Global Burden of Disease and Risk Factors:

The document begins by explaining it was funded by Gates. It also states the information within may not be accurate:

Regardless of not being able to confirm accuracy of the content, the information was to be used as official data. On Page 52 we learn how they are arriving at the number of cases prevented… it is the number of births prevented since the inception of the program… if you are not born, you cannot catch River Blindness:

It’s just like ending poverty; when everyone is eradicated, nobody will be poor.

Also in 2006:

Come the end of the year (2006), we see the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation Trust tax filing. It mentions Africa 123 times:

And it includes at least one program under the name Ivermectin:

The tax filing is 422 pages long, so I’m sure there’s more Ivermectin hidden in there under different names.

In 2012, The END Fund was established to control and eliminate tropical disease in Africa and India – the identical two areas that Rockefeller’s Population Council, back in 1969, stated needed growth driven down to 0.

The END Fund (which is a creepy name, isn’t it?) is an “ongoing mass drug administration program”. One of The END Fund’s main funders is the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, another funder is a convicted felon who was sentenced to 16 years in prison but only served 19 months followed by two months under house arrest. Other big donors include names like the Children’s Investment Fund, Rothschild, Later-Day Saints and more:

(Fun Fact: The Campbell Family Foundation, shown above, is not only active in the Ivermectin arena, it is also hugely part of the Agriculture industry. In my series The Literal Milk War & the Rise of the DAIRY CARTEL: Raw Cheese and Untold History, we discussed how the government, through the Milk Cartels, took control over the output of dairy and began poisoning it.

They then ran PSYOPs on the American public, using our tax dollars, to convince us to eat it. Anyway, that is what Campbell is also involved in.)

Skip ahead three years to 2015: The birth rate was continuing to plummet in Africa and it had substantially decreased worldwide:

It was at this time that Ivermectin became an essential medicine per the WHO. It also officially became an “award winning” when the Nobel Prize was given to the Japanese scientist who found the alleged dirt bacteria.

Now if you’re like me, your next question is, “Who selects the Nobel Prize winners?”. In this case, The Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences. Who are they? A branch off the Royal Society. 

The Royal Society is an advocate of population control. Oh, and just to be clear, Ivermectin never won the Nobel Prize – when people are telling you this they are either mistaken or lying. Who won the Nobel was the Japanese scientist who discovered the dirt bacteria.

In 2018, large-scale Ivermectin distribution began in Samoa:

As well as in Cameroon:

In Cameroon, back in 2009, there were 600,000 total people with vision imparment. 11 years later, which was only 24 months after the mass Ivermectin campaign began, Cameroon logged 2.6 million people suffering from vision impairment of which 100,000 were fully blind:

See more here Substack

Please Donate Below To Support Our Ongoing Work To Defend The Scientific Method

PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL, legally registered in the UK as a company incorporated for charitable purposes. Head Office: 27 Old Gloucester Street, London WC1N 3AX. 

Trackback from your site.