I discovered the government-imposed lockdown measures were replacing perfectly good pandemic plans that were updated August 2019. These were plans which, from what I could tell, hardly saw the light of day despite how much they cost to put together.
Australia, and much of the world, was ‘off script’.
No attention was being given to the well-documented costs of lockdowns and no effort was directed toward early treatment options. Nor were there attempts to improve the immune health of Australians through measures like nutrition, reducing alcohol consumption, and exercising. None.
With all this hand-washing, comfort eating, drinking, isolating, and fear mongering Australians were sitting ducks as far as their health was concerned. Meanwhile, the government and Chief Health Officers told us to sit tight and wait for the ‘saviour’ vaccine to arrive.
In August 2020, when Scott Morrison announced: ‘I would expect (the vaccine) to be as mandatory as you could possibly make it,’ I felt my eyebrows rise. Just how was our Prime Minister going to do that? The ethical, medical, and legal implications concerned me.
The Australian Health Practitioner Regulation Authority (AHPRA) position statement on Covid vaccination arrived in the mail in March 2021, and I felt my eyebrows rise again. AHPRA effectively told doctors to fall in line with government policy, warning that regulatory action may follow if a practitioner promoted anti-vaccination statements or undermined the immunisation campaign. More groundwork being laid.
Finally, in June 2021, Lt. General John Frewen was appointed as head of the National Covid Vaccine Taskforce. It became apparent we were part of a military-style operation, especially considering there were actual military forces policing our streets.
When the vaccine arrived in Australia, I decided to perform a personal risk-benefit analysis.
As a cancer survivor (I’m well now, thanks for asking), it had taken years to regain full health and I was keen to stay that way. The Covid risk calculator estimated my chance of survival at over 99 per cent. Not bad.
I then looked to the mRNA vaccines. Early data from overseas showed some concerning safety signals and surprising evidence of similar transmission rates by both vaccinated and unvaccinated. I could only surmise: we had new drug technology, with limited data, worrying safety signals, and indications it didn’t prevent infection or transmission.
For me, the risks did not outweigh the benefits, especially if it meant I could still infect my patients.
When the Tasmanian government mandated vaccines for all healthcare workers, I personally went, research in hand, and spoke to as many politicians as I could, recommending they adopt a risk management approach.
I spent hours writing, phoning, and visiting – arguing the point based on scientific evidence, ethics, and medical resource management.
I reasoned our state couldn’t afford to lose any healthcare professionals who would rather walk than take the vaccine.
I pleaded for the middle ground and a strategic approach including personal protective equipment (PPE), rapid antigen testing, and Telehealth – not just vaccination – to preserve both autonomy and the workforce so the healthcare system didn’t suffer further.
Many sympathised behind closed doors, but were unwilling to speak publicly (except Senator Eric Abetz, thanks Eric).
When the mandates came into effect, I chose to remain unvaccinated along with hundreds of others and was forced to stop work. I wasn’t even allowed to do Telehealth (can someone please explain that to me?). It felt punitive.
Now the truth is coming out.
The Centres for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) has announced no difference between vaccinated and unvaccinated as the vaccines don’t prevent infection or transmission.
In addition, the Australian Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA) has received more adverse reports in 2021 through June 2022 (18 months) for Covid vaccines than over the past 50 years for all other vaccines combined. This is not simply because of the number of Covid vaccinations.
Around the world there has been a significantly higher rate of reported adverse events and deaths for Covid vaccinations when compared with non-Coid vaccines like measles, polio, and flu vaccines.
And finally, the latest hospital admission statistics do not support the claim that the unvaccinated are more at risk of serious Covid disease, hospitalisation or death.
Just how bad is it? We don’t know. There is no long-term toxicity, carcinogenicity (cancer-causing), genotoxicity (effect on genes), or fertility studies.
This ‘thing’ that we have been doing the past two years, is not healthcare. I don’t know what it is, but it is not healthcare, and it was obvious from the start. It is not benefiting the ‘greater good’. It is not looking after grandma. It is not ‘doing our bit and protecting others’. It is not saving lives.
It never was.
As the fog of Covid-war lifts, I suspect we will realise more people have been harmed because of this single-minded ‘vaccine-or-bust’ approach than any other intervention foisted on the people before now. It truly is an iatrogenic crisis caused by bureaucrat-prescribed ‘medical’ treatment.
If an ‘anti-vaxxer’ is someone who cannot give informed consent to a ‘vaccine’ that fails to prevent infection or transmission, has alarming safety signals, must be taken to earn back the right to live and work in society, for a disease that has a greater-than 99 per cent survivability rate, then ‘yes’, I’m an anti-vaxxer…
My government made it so.
See more here spectator.com.au
Header image: Getty Images
Please Donate Below To Support Our Ongoing Work To Expose The Lies About COVID19
PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL, legally registered in the UK as a company 
incorporated for charitable purposes. Head Office: 27 Old Gloucester Street, London WC1N 3AX.
VOWG
| #
There is a difference between the vaxxed and unvaxxed. The unvaxxed are not dying from the vax.
Reply
Peter F Gill
| #
Foolishly, because I anticipated the need to prove one had been “vaccinated” in order to be able to travel abroad, I had two Astra Zeneca jabs. I took this action in spite of my own research showing most of the concerns Julie has referenced. Once it became clear that another set of agendas was in place I refused all the invitation for boosters. My latest letter from NHS UK was entitled “Book your seasonal COVID-19 vaccination now” signalling the this is going be a regular feature either until people in general call a halt.
Reply
Upchuck.Liberals
| #
In the states we are going for the jab of the quarter and we are still trying to kill off our children with them. In California the State Legislature has decreed that if you are a Dr. thou shalt not speak ill of the clot shots. Or you go to jail. I and most of my family remain pure of blood as this farce winds down with the wheels falling off the wagon.
Reply
Ken Hughes
| #
Well, after this scam, I am a true anti vaxxer. Having lost all trust in the medical establishment, what other course of action do I have?
Reply
Saeed Qureshi
| #
https://bioanalyticx.com/anti-vaxxers-vs-vaxxers/
Reply
D. Boss
| #
The “Medical Profession” never had any credibility in my view, if one looked dispassionately at their track record. They are nothing more than Glorified plumbers and mechanics, tasked with repairing complex machines they really do not fully understand. Look at their track record:
On salt: huge studies have confirmed low sodium diet actually causes blood and heart issues, whereas those on supposed high sodium intake, had fewer of these cardiovascular issues!
On carbs vs protein – the wrong headed food pyramid – excessive carb intake causes all sorts of maladies like diabetes, and a host of inflammatory problems.
On fat and cholesterol – has also been a huge fiasco – your brain and muscles are made of cholesterol – again huge real studies show this low cholesterol bandwagon causes way more harm than good, and is contra to real health.
And on and on….
I refer to the piece in the Lancet where it is stated:
“The case against science is straightforward: much of the scientific literature, perhaps half, may simply be untrue. Afflicted by studies with small sample sizes, tiny effects, invalid exploratory analyses, and flagrant conflicts of interest, together with an obsession for pursuing fashionable trends of dubious importance, science has taken a turn towards darkness”
– Richard Horton, editor of The Lancet
And finally, in the US, for decades, 400,000 persons a year die of doctor’s and hospital’s mistakes, plus adverse reactions to prescription drugs. That alone should make any sane person be very skeptical and wary of anything a “Medical Professional” tells you to do!
The plandemic just made it patently obvious to those blinded by the white lab coats and deification of medical persons.
Reply
Upchuck.Liberals
| #
I tend somewhat to agree with you, after 75 years and some interesting interesting chest issues I went into the ER, which in turn landed me in the Cardiac ward and….a day later a nice new stent in an Artery that was 98% blocked. I have a major one that is 50% blocked but has good flow so they left it alone. All that said, I LOVE my critters with faces…on my plate where they belong. Now it’s a bit of moderation but heck I might as well enjoy my remaining years and I’m not a damn rabbit. I think the genetic lottery plays a lot into if you kick off this rock.
Reply