How fear-based climate journalism breeds anxiety
I named this publication Irrational Fear for a reason. The most powerful institutions in our culture: legacy media, activist scientists, and a monoculture in academia, sell fear first and facts last
The damage is visible in young people.
Climate catastrophizing is now a feature, not a bug, of the message machine, and the evidence is plain: catastrophism elevates anxiety and depression, while knowledge brings that anxiety down.
The Guardian just offered a pristine specimen of the panic industry. Bill McGuire’s column claims we are “hurtling into climate disaster,” declares a 1.5 °C threshold already crossed, and insists that at 2 °C the world will lose a quarter of its economy and two billion people will die:
A recent report by the UK Institute and Faculty of Actuaries and Exeter University forecasts that a 2C global temperature hike by 2050 would see a 25 percent collapse in the global economy and two billion people dead.
None of that is supported by the record that actually surrounds us.
During the modern warming era, the human condition has improved across almost every measurable dimension: longevity, literacy, poverty, and access to energy have trended in the right direction.
That is not a controversial statement; it is a summary of data from the last two centuries.
Even the thresholds themselves keep slipping. Successive IPCC reports have re-tinted their “tipping point” gauges so that what once counted as high-risk at 4–5 °C is now painted as high-risk near 1–2 °C.
The effect is simple: the crisis is always “now,” even when observations refuse to cooperate. I documented this drift in Shifting Lines in the Sand.
If you want to understand why the messaging gets louder while lived reality mostly improves, consider what the mental-health literature already shows: environmental knowledge is inversely associated with climate anxiety.
The more people learn, the less the apocalypse seems to stick. That is exactly the opposite of how panic media operate.
This isn’t just sloppy communication. It becomes dangerous politics. When media and academics declare opponents “murderers of the planet,” unbalanced people eventually take the next step.
The Guardian piece is not journalism. It is an accelerant. It spreads panic, shifts goalposts, and frames political opponents as existential threats.
That posture has predictable consequences. We all saw the double standards around recent assassinations and campus reactions; some commentators did not endorse the acts but worked overtime to explain them away.
That is a moral failure, and it is a pattern.
See more here substack.com
Some bold emphasis added
Please Donate Below To Support Our Ongoing Work To Defend The Scientific Method
PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL, legally registered in the UK as a company 
incorporated for charitable purposes. Head Office: 27 Old Gloucester Street, London WC1N 3AX.
Tom
| #
Ignore the MSM and all its lies…now you are anxiety free. Easy to do.
Reply