How Churchill Applied Darwin’s Science to Decimate India by Famine
Jonas E. Alexis: In my article “Winston Churchill’s Darkest Hour?” I meticulously detailed how Winston Churchill was a mass-murdering clown.
I also briefly touched on how he was responsible for the death of millions upon millions of Indians. At one point, Churchill said: “I hate Indians. They are a beastly people with a beastly religion.”
As I will be pointing out in my upcoming book, which is tentatively titled Kevin MacDonald’s Abject Failure: A Philosophical and Moral Critique of Evolutionary Psychology, Sociobiology, and White Identity, Churchill was a product of both Zionism and Darwinism.
To his credit, he wrote an entire article in the Sunday Herald in 1920 arguing that Zionism and Jewish subversive movements are essentially diabolical, but Churchill was making money from World War I because he became Ernest “Cassel’s creature,” one of the most “influential Jewish moneylenders” then.[1]
Once that happened, Churchill began to hate the Germans. In the process, he starved the German civilians to death and bragged about it. This is Churchill at his best: “Starve the whole population—men, women and children, old and young, wounded and sound—into submission.”[2]
As an avowed social Darwinist and Zionist, Churchill loved to see people he considered “inferior” bleed to death. It was Churchill himself who unflinchingly declared:
“I am strongly in favour of using poisoned gas against uncivilized tribes. The moral effect should be so good that the loss of life should be reduced to a minimum.”[3]
But there is more to Churchill than meet the eye and here. GreatGameIndia, a journal on Geopolitics and International Relations, will unpack this for us here.
A new study by Indian and American researchers confirm how Winston Churchill caused the Bengal Famine and starved over 3 million Indians to death. Glorified as the “Saviour of the World” in the west and dubbed the “Butcher of Bengal” by Indians, the streets of eastern Indian cities were lined with corpses as a direct result of Churchill’s policies. Yet, the story of this Indian Holocaust remain unspoken to this day.
The Indian Holocaust
The Bengal famine of 1943 was the only one in modern Indian history not to occur as a result of serious drought, according to a study that provides scientific backing for arguments that Churchill-era British policies were a significant factor contributing to the catastrophe.
Researchers in India and the US used weather data to simulate the amount of moisture in the soil during six major famines in the subcontinent between 1873 and 1943. Soil moisture deficits, brought about by poor rainfall and high temperatures, are a key indicator of drought.
Five of the famines were correlated with significant soil moisture deficits. An 11% deficit measured across much of north India in 1896-97, for example, coincided with food shortages across the country that killed an estimated 5 million people.
However, the 1943 famine in Bengal, which killed over 3 million people, was different, according to the researchers. Though the eastern Indian region was affected by drought for much of the 1940s, conditions were worst in 1941, years before the most extreme stage of the famine, when newspapers began to publish images of the dying on the streets of Kolkata, then named Calcutta, against the wishes of the colonial British administration.
In late 1943, thought to be the peak of the famine, rain levels were above average, said the study published in February in the journal Geophysical Research Letters.
“This was a unique famine, caused by policy failure instead of any monsoon failure,” said Vimal Mishra, the lead researcher and an associate professor at the Indian Institute of Technology, Gandhinagar.
Food supplies to Bengal were reduced in the years preceding 1943 by natural disasters, outbreaks of infections in crops and the fall of Burma – now Myanmar – which was a major source of rice imports, into Japanese hands.
But the Nobel prize-winning economist Amartya Sen argued in 1981 that there should still have been enough supplies to feed the region, and that the mass deaths came about as a combination of wartime inflation, speculative buying and panic hoarding, which together pushed the price of food out of the reach of poor Bengalis.
More recent studies, including those by the journalist Madhushree Mukerjee, have argued the famine was exacerbated by the decisions of Winston Churchill’s wartime cabinet in London.
Mukerjee has presented evidence the cabinet was warned repeatedly that the exhaustive use of Indian resources for the war effort could result in famine, but it opted to continue exporting rice from India to elsewhere in the empire.
Rice stocks continued to leave India even as London was denying urgent requests from India’s viceroy for more than 1m tonnes of emergency wheat supplies in 1942-43. Churchill has been quoted as blaming the famine on the fact Indians were “breeding like rabbits”, and asking how, if the shortages were so bad, Mahatma Gandhi was still alive.
Mukerjee and others also point to Britain’s “denial policy” in the region, in which huge supplies of rice and thousands of boats were confiscated from coastal areas of Bengal in order to deny resources to the Japanese army in case of a future invasion.
During a famine in Bihar in 1873-74, the local government led by Sir Richard Temple responded swiftly by importing food and enacting welfare programmes to assist the poor to purchase food.
Almost nobody died, but Temple was severely criticised by British authorities for spending so much money on the response. In response, he reduced the scale of subsequent famine responses in south and western India and mortality rates soared.
Though India’s population has vastly increased since the British colonial era, the country has largely eliminated famine deaths owing to more efficient irrigation practices, improvements in seed yields, a stronger food distribution and welfare system and better transport links, which allow emergency food stocks to be moved quickly to deprived areas.
Charles Darwin – The Godfather of Eugenics
Charles Darwin is regarded as the father of the science of evolution in India and many other countries. He gave us the Theory of Evolution and his thesis later became fodder for Spencer’s Survival of the Fittest theory – a basis for free-market capitalism followed by the East India Company then as Free-Trade and as Globalization now by the Multinational corporations.
John G. West, senior fellow at the Discovery Institute in his path breaking study reveals how Darwin prepared the way for eugenics. Indeed, his immediate family would soon be involved in that movement — his sons George and Leonard became active in promoting it (Leonard serving as “president of the Eugenics Education Society, the main eugenics group in Great Britain”), and his cousin Francis Galton became the founder of the “eugenics crusade.”
Evidently, Darwin was sympathetic to eugenics: West quotes him as vowing “to cut off communication” with his disciple Mivart when the latter “criticized an article by Darwin’s son George that advocated eugenics.”
The Darwinian basis for eugenics is often downplayed, West observes, yet it is a fact that eugenicists drew their “inspiration” directly from Darwinian biology. A number of the chief eugenicists of the early 20th century declared that natural selection was the “law” they followed to improve the race. Moreover, the American leaders in eugenics, who were “largely university-trained biologists and doctors” affiliated with places like Harvard, Princeton, Columbia, Stanford, and the Museum of Natural History, presented eugenics as biologically “justified.”
Between 1920 and 1939, West shows, Darwin’s theory was constantly used in high-school biology textbooks to support eugenics, something that shows how much mainstream science accepted this form of population control.
By having their racial superiority supported by Darwin’s theories, these Oligarchs for nearly 200 years, have gone on a rampage against what they consider to be inferior races leading to the Indian Holocaust and genocide of entire populations—including the indigenous peoples of the America’s, Africa, Asia, Australia, along with those of Jewish heritage.
Population Control or Depopulation Policy
Population Control Law is actually Agenda 21 which is a British policy to reduce the population of former colonies like India through various sterilization projects and other policies implemented through the United Nations and popularised by Hollywood to effectively keep nations under Anglo-American orbit.
On Dec. 10, 1974, the U.S. National Security Council under Henry Kissinger completed a classified 200-page study, “National Security Study Memorandum 200: Implications of Worldwide Population Growth for U.S. Security and Overseas Interests.”
The study falsely claimed that population growth in the so-called Lesser Developed Countries (LDCs) like India was a grave threat to U.S. national security. Adopted as official policy in November 1975 by President Gerald Ford, NSSM 200 outlined a covert plan to reduce population growth in those countries including India through birth control, and also, implicitly, war and famine.
Brent Scowcroft, who had by then replaced Kissinger as national security adviser, was put in charge of implementing the plan. CIA Director George Bush was ordered to assist Scowcroft, as were the secretaries of state, treasury, defense, and agriculture.
The bogus arguments that Kissinger advanced were not original. One of his major sources was the Royal Commission on Population, which King George VI had created in 1944 “to consider what measures should be taken in the national interest to influence the future trend of population.”
The commission found that Britain was gravely threatened by population growth in its colonies – the biggest being India, since “a populous country has decided advantages over a sparsely-populated one for industrial production.” The combined effects of increasing population and industrialization in its colonies, it warned, “might be decisive in its effects on the prestige and influence of the West,” especially effecting “military strength and security.
NSSM 200 similarly concluded that the United States was threatened by population growth in the former colonial sector. It paid special attention to 13 “key countries” in which the United States had a “special political and strategic interest”: India, Bangladesh, Pakistan, Indonesia, Thailand, the Philippines, Turkey, Nigeria, Egypt, Ethiopia, Mexico, Brazil, and Colombia. It claimed that population growth in those states was especially worrisome, since it would quickly increase their relative political, economic, and military strength.
This policy, known infamously as ‘Depopulation Policy’ and now being normalised through Hollywood movies, the latest being Mission Impossible: Fallout and most aptly personified by Thanos in Marvel’s Infinity War was imported to India via the United Nations’ Agenda 21.
This 1974 memorandum drafted by Henry Kissinger led directly to the unleashing of experimental vaccines on the unsuspecting public. It sighted countries as targets for “initial population reduction experimentation to be implemented around the year 2000″. They identified India, Bangladesh, Pakistan, Nigeria, Mexico, Indonesia, Brazil, Philippines, Thailand, Egypt, Turkey, Ethiopia & Columbia for study.
Three million Filipinos ages 12-48 were given a test vaccine that ruined their health. North American black & native American women were each given the same vaccine resulting in sterility rates of 25 & 35 percent respectively. The directive came from the WHO and was directly tied to Kissinger’s report.
The Bloodline
These deadly theories were prevalent among the high circles of the British Empire and the East India Company. Winston Churchill the Saviour of the World from the Nazis not only promoted Darwinian eugenics in words and deeds but was directly related to Charles Darwin – they share the same bloodline. It is in the context of this guiding philosophy that Churchill said, “I hate Indians. They are a beastly people with a beastly religion. The famine was their own fault for breeding like rabbits.”
However it was the series of Churchill’s decisions between 1940 and 1944 that directly and inevitably led to the deaths of over three million Indians. The streets of eastern Indian cities were lined with corpses as a direct result of these policies. Yet, the story of this Indian Holocaust remain unspoken to this day.
What is more is that the people of India are a long way to acknowledge the role of Darwinian theories in causing the Indian Holocaust. While countries around the world are starting to realize and reject these dubious and deadly theories of eugenics and taking it off from their school textbooks, why are we Indians still teaching our kids about them and praising this Godfather Of Eugenics?
This historical conflict between the British, the Church, the FreeMasonic Orders and the French — in the context of which India became a victim is explained in the book India in Cognitive Dissonance.
References
- [1] E. Michael Jones, Barren Metal: A History of Capitalism as the Conflict Between Labor and Usury (South Bend: Fidelity Press, 2014), 1201-1202.
- [2] Ibid., 1211.
- [3] Quoted in Warren Dockter, Churchill and the Islamic World (New York & London: I. B. Tauris & Co., 2015), 113.
See more here: veteranstoday.com
Header image: History.com
Please Donate Below To Support Our Ongoing Work To Defend The Scientific Method
PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL, legally registered in the UK as a company 
incorporated for charitable purposes. Head Office: 27 Old Gloucester Street, London WC1N 3AX.
Trackback from your site.
Alan
| #
The more I read about Churchill, the more diffiuclt it becomes to understand how he ever became to be considered the greatest Britain.
Reply
Robert Beatty
| #
Marxist propaganda requires that history be rewritten to suit that mantra. These days Neo Marxist inspired ideology is appearing in many of the west’s traditional institutions, directed at undermining our faith in those institutions. It is the major part of the war within. Introducing Bottom Up government can combat this, similar to that practiced in Switzerland. See https://bosmin.com/HOME/Bottom-UpGovernment.pdf
Reply
Jerry Krause
| #
Hi Robert,
Being a Politician is a tough job for seldom in the US does a political win an election with more than 55% of the vote. Hence, one has 45% of voters against you at the beginning. Relative to your regular reference to the Swiss governing systems, I question how familiar you are with the US system? The President’s term is 4 years and is limited to two consecutive terms. Each state gets two senators who are elected for a 6 year term. Each state gets the number of representatives based on its population which each state getting at least one representative. The representative is only elected for a term of two years. Hence, representatives are continually running for re-election at the same time they are responsible for originating revenue legislation. Which has to be passed by both the Senators and the President. There should be some way to limit the number years both Senators and Representatives can consecutiveLy serve as the President is limited. Maybe 12 years (two terms for Senators and 10 years (five items) for representatives.
The basic problem of elective, representative government is too many voters LOVE SANTA CLAUS.
“Most people say that it is the intellect which makes a great scientist. They are wrong; it is character.” (A. Einstein). Just some thoughts for one to ponder.
Have a good day, Jerry
Hav
Reply
Mark Tapley
| #
Hello Jerry:
Tough job huh? Practically all of these puppet actors are well connected to begin with. Most of these positions, especially in the senate are really sinecures for life. And most of them have done extremely well for themselves at the public trough. Take Zionist Jew Diane Feinstein. She is now worth over a billion on her 170,000 salary. Right after Eugenicist Gates “pre pandemic” meeting our selfless public servants in the senate held their own closed door meeting in which they tipped off their big donors. Several of these same senators were subsequently caught pulling out millions of dollars out at the top of the market right before the fake virus was sprung. But I guess that was just a incidence, huh Jerry. Like you said, its a tough job but someone has to do it.
Now as we delve deeper into our civics course, we find that in Jewmerica the Zionist Jews are the top donors to both the fake Rep. and fake Dem. party. That is why no one of either party will vote against anything concerning Israel or any part of the Zionist agenda as all our shabbas butt goys in both the house and senate learn (if by some fluke they didn’t know already). A good illustration is the former black congresswoman Cynthia McKinny from Georgia. She had this strange notion when elected to the U.S. house that she was supposed to serve her constituents. As soon as she got to her office in D.C. aIPAC was waiting with pledge in hand for her signature. when she refused, guess where all that Jew money went in the next election. In her new opponents pocket.
Jerry you and a lot of other Repubicucks are, next to the so called Christian Zionists, the stupidest people on the earth. Trump has always been controlled by the Zionist Jews. He works for Chabad Lubavitch. All of his adult children are married to Jews. His favorite daughter is married into the chabad Lubavitvh Kushner clan. Upon leaving office, Trump pardoned Israeli super spy Pollard and several high level criminals that had donated large sums to Chabad Lubavich. I could go on but I think even you get the point. All of those puppets actors are just putting on a circus act to appear to oppose each other. It has gotten so sloppy they hardly even try to conceal the stupidity. Like the cobbled together impeachment of adolescent idiot Trump or the ridiculous fake election and the totally asinine capitol riot. We really do have what our founders declared to be the worst form of government, a :”democracy” or as Ezra Pound defined it “a country run by Jews.” I leave you with a quote by Bill Clinton’s History Prof. at Georgetown:
“The argument that the two parties should represent opposed ideals and policies, one, perhaps, of the Right and the other of the Left, is a foolish idea acceptable only to doctrinaire and academic thinkers. Instead, the two parties should be almost identical, so that the American people can throw the rascals out at any election without leading to any profound or extensive shifts in policy. Then it should be possible to replace it, every four years if necessary, by the other party, which will be none of these things but will still pursue, with new vigor, approximately the same basic policies.”
— Carroll Quigley
https://www.bitchute.com/video/ui2L7IJ6kMlu/
https://www.bitchute.com/video/bYtuRPLnHwBk/
https://www.bitchute.com/video/a7RSTEMwWi72/
Reply
VOWG
| #
Is it not interesting how todays covid mass murdering clowns are obeyed and revered, and paid massive sums of money taken from those they wish to destroy.
Reply
Alcheminister
| #
It’s kinda explicit…
Reply
GORDON
| #
DORIS LOVES INDIANS AND IS EVEN WORSE THAN WINNIE,,,…DAILY STUDY THIS WEBSITE TO LEARN WHAT IS GOING ON…https://vernoncoleman.org/articles/do-conspirators-now-want-world-war-iii
Reply
Herb Rose
| #
Let’s see. England was being cut off from supplies by the German U-Boats, London was being bombed by the Luftwaffe, the army was fighting in North Africa to save the Suez Canal, And Winston didn’t drop everything everything to try to ship rice to India. He was obviously trying to starve the Indians, reduce the population (despite the fact he needed them as soldiers. It makes perfect sense that he was trying to follow some master plan (survival of the fittest is not a plan and has to do with reproducing. Something the Indians were good at and the English were not.) When you are at war the first thoughts are always on how do we reduce the population of our allies
This crap is an attempt to make an event (drought in India, as well as floods, are not rare or planned) to support the ideological beliefs of idiots.
Reply
Mark Tapley
| #
Churchill did everything possible to provoke the Germans, bombing German cities 8 times before the Germans finally retaliated. Hitler sent over several peace agreements that any reasonable person would have jumped on. Of course the entire war was controlled from start to finish. That is why when the much superior German army trapped the 330,000 man British with lots of French at Dunkirk, this would have won the war on the continent for Germany right off. This could not be allowed so Zionist operative Hitler did the only thing possible to save the British by letting them all float back to England. We see these monumental “mistakes” all the way through the war.
Reply
bmatkin
| #
Or, Churchill bombed German cities so that Hitler would stop bombing airstrips and planes.
Or, Hitler’s peace agreements weren’t worth toilet paper and he broke every one of them.
Or, the Panzer armies ran out of momentum at Dunkirk and still had a substantial French Army to defeat AND were now in range of land base English fighters.
Or, There was enough defense on the coast to stall the Germans for a week or so.
Or, Your preoccupation with “Zionist” garbage is giving everyone a headache.
Or, there was no such thing as Anglo Zionists as England’s upper crust really didn’t like Jews.
Or, Rothschild didn’t agree with turning Palestine into Israel. You might remember that the British were the occupation force stopping returning Jews from Europe to Palestine.
I’d say you’ve pretty much got everything wrong.
Reply
VOWG
| #
I would say you are pretty much correct.
Reply
Hans
| #
bmatkin, you took the words right out of mine mouth.
Mr Tapley, has an utter distortion of historical events. We
should be all GLADD, that he is not a publisher of educational
books. Nothing he has said is factual, with his inane comments.
Reply
Mark Tapley
| #
Hello Bmatkin:
None of your argument makes any sense but intact get more ridiculous as it goes. As I stated, the warmonger Churchill Bombed German cities (civilians) 8 times before the Germans retaliated. During this period The British government was offered very favorable peace terms that would have stopped the conflict and ultimately saved millions of lives and massive destruction. Britain at this time had not recovered physically or psychologically from the first World war and the loss o 750,000 young men,. And just as in the first conflict could not attempt to combat Germany on its own but depended not only on massive material aid but also U.S. troops. At this time as the German economy had flourished Britain remained stagnated and its people were among the poorest in Europe. The last thing they needed was another war. Any halt in fighting was in the British interests in fact rather than Germany, that really needed to process the war as quickly as possible. These peace offers were kept top secret from the people of Britain but just as in the first war they were constantly bombarded with lies about Germany.
the BEF forced at Dunkirk were trapped in a completely indefensible situation. A static defense in their position against German troops and heavy armor (as was indicated by their predicament in the first place) would not have even been attempted (or they already would have). These trapped rats would have surrendered immediately but only because of Hitler was Britain allowed to bring in anything that would halfway float in order to evacuate this poor excuse for an army. It should be mentioned that not only did Germany have tank battalions on site but the Luftwaffe was standing ready to bomb the stranded British and French to oblivion.
Your last contention as to the bridgehead in Palestine is something that defies all historical record. I have already referred to the Zionist Convention of 1897 where Herzl’s proposal for the invasion and occupation of Palestine was ordered. Britain had already offered the Zionist Jews the whole country of Uganda but this was vehemently rejected by the Zionist leaders. We even have record of the 1907 meeting between then Prime Minister Balfour and Zionist leader Chaim Wizemann in which Balfour (Anglo Zionist as I have already covered) agreed to take this area for the Jews knowing full well it would require war with Turkey. The only reason the occupying Khazars were not all killed or driven out was because of British occupation forces. I also refer you to the Havara agreement in which the Zionist leaders and the German government (at the behest of the Zionist leaders) transported thousands of the most educated and able-bodied Khazar Jews into Palestine in order to bring up the Jew population in an area that naturally hardly any wanted to go. There was even a coin stamped in commemoration with the Swastica on one side and the Jewish symbol on the other. It was only after the war when Stalin (((Dzhugasvilli))) poured military aid in for the Khazar thugs to be soon followed by the U,.S. that the Khazars could maintain there foothold. Today the U.S. continues to supply 11 million per day for these terrorists or the Arabs would still wipe them off the face of the earth.
As far as the Rothschild’s themselves, we know that at least by the 1840’s they were buying land in Palestine from Turkey. It was reported in Newspapers in the early 1900’s that they had bought the whole city of Jerusalem. We do know that much of the present infrastructure including the Masonic Supreme court building was payed foe by them. In any case the land purchases were stopped as it became clear that the only way to gain this most critical bridgehead was militarily. This is what the British military was for. Once the task was completed, the British were kicked out, as they were no longer needed.
Reply
Mark Tapley
| #
The warmongering alcoholic Zionist half Jew Churchill (mother Jenny Jerome (Jacobson-banking associate of Rothschilds) was Lord of the Admiralty during the Zionist contrived WW1 that had been in the works since the British attacks on the Boers begging in the 1880’s. After seizing the minerals of S.A. the next objective was the destruction of Germany, to establish the bridgehead in Palestine as laid out by Rothschild front man Herzl at the first Zionist convention in 1897 and to establish the eastern kingdom of the USSR with the Bolshevik (Zionist Jew) Revolution first attempted in 1906 but succeeding in 1917.
Churchill was a member of the Anglo Zionists led by Alfred Milner and included Lord Rothschild, Cecil Rhodes, Edward VII, Asquith, Edward Grey, Balfour, Jan Smutts and others. Churchill was the main planner for the disastrous Dardanelles campaign against Turkey that was intended to fail (costing 115,000 British and 27,000 French) so as to keep Russia in the war but keep them bottled up in the Black Sea. All of this and lots more are covered in Gerry Docherty’s “:Hidden History, The Secret Origins of The First World War.”
After the war Churchill was in disgrace because of the Gallipoli disaster and only retained his seat in Parliament that did not pay much. With his extravagant life style and large estate with servants to maintain, soon he was deep in debt. At one point he even resorted to forging artwork. Just as it looked like Churchill would go under, he was picked up and his huge debts payed off by the Zionist Jew Focus group in order to prepare the British sheep for another war to finish off Germany in the next phase of the long teem Zionist plan.
It required huge amounts of long term planning and resources to accomplish the objectives in the first and second Work Wars. The philosophical heirs of this cartel of highly placed criminals are the same one at work today with contrived wars, fake vaccines and the “Green Energy” future. The only difference today is they have a lot more power than during Churchill’s time. I think it is a reasonable statement to say that this criminal syndicate is now within clear sight of their final goal of a totalitarian Government within the long planned framework of their U.N. Agenda 2030-21.
Reply
Bill
| #
Always fun to see people compare opposing propaganda as historical facts, what ever historical fact is. Of course each will think their own brand of history is the correct one. Or maybe, if they’re half-witted, they’ll source a contrarian author that wrote a “really interesting take” on a subject.
The reality. The real reality. Is there are shades of gray and propaganda is never to be trusted 100%. Anyone that touts their “history” as fact is a dunce.
Reply
Seriously
| #
👏👏👏…’Too often we judge other groups by their worst examples, while judging ourselves by our best intentions ‘…credited to George W. Bush
Reply
Mark Tapely
| #
More on the drunkard warmongering coward and Zionist puppet Churchill:
https://www.bitchute.com/video/CMvGQ2PTJGRS/
Reply
Hans
| #
Read all about, WWII aerial bombing campaign by combatants and
not opinion points of view with no cites.
https://digital-commons.usnwc.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1000&context=newport-papers
Reply
Mark Tapley
| #
Hello Hans:
This is nothing but an allied propaganda piece. 90% of the devastation caused by the allied bombing was after Germany was effectively beaten. This includes the massive slaughter of civilians, much more than the alleged atomic attacks (actually fire bombing) of Hiroshima and Nagasaki that were perpetrated against Hamburg and the historic medieval city of Dresden, which had practically no military significance but was rather a hub for fleeing civilian refugees. Bomber Harris and the Focus (Zionist puppet) group’s warmonger and drunk Churchill primarily civilian housing in these huge bombing campaigns instead of industrial infrastructure.
Many American soldiers, when entering Germany at the collapse, were amazed to see large industrial complexes built under American contracts such as GM, Ford, Dupont, ITT, along with the German counterparts such as IG Farben practically untouched. This is not just “reports by combatants or allied propaganda but documented (even showing many photocopies) by Stanford University professor and Hoover Institute researcher Anthony Sutton in his book “Wall Street and the Rise of Hitler.” The entire war was controlled from start to finish (as was WW1) in order to maximize profits for the Zionist syndicate that control the countries (just as today as evidenced by the fake virus medical fear hoax) and maximize destruction as the next phase of the agenda was set up (after the destruction of Germany) for reversing “our great Soviet allies” into “our deadly enemies” with the fake “Cold War” while all the time the U.S. continued its program of massive aid to keep the soviets propped up.
Neither does your propaganda piece mention the million German POW’s (more than killed in combat) who were murdered by Eisenhower’s extermination policy of exposure in open encampments and starvation as documented in James Bacque’s “Other Losses.”
5
Reply