How Bitcoin Challenges State Control & Surveillance – You’re The Voice Ep. 62 with Roger Huang
My guest today is Roger Huang, an author, journalist on Forbes, Bitcoin Magazine and more, and a Bitcoin advocate, whose work bridges the intersection of Bitcoin, geopolitics, economics, and history.
Roger is the author of “Would Mao Hold Bitcoin?”, an exploration of Bitcoin’s potential within China’s political and monetary landscape.
From the impact of inflation on historical events like Tiananmen Square to the implications of digital surveillance and central bank digital currencies, Roger provides a comprehensive analysis of how Bitcoin can challenge state control and empower individuals.
In this episode, we explore Roger’s journey from his roots in China to his upbringing in Canada, and how his disillusionment with the traditional financial system inspired him to advocate for Bitcoin as a tool for freedom and decentralization.
Roger shares powerful stories about the Chinese surveillance state, the role of inflation in shaping politics, and the growing global influence of China’s economic strategies, including the Belt and Road Initiative and CBDC development.
See more here Efratblog.com
Please Donate Below To Support Our Ongoing Work To Defend The Scientific Method
PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL, legally registered in the UK as a company 
incorporated for charitable purposes. Head Office: 27 Old Gloucester Street, London WC1N 3AX.
Trackback from your site.
Tony
| #
https://linktr.ee/theglobalfamilygroup_528hertz
http://www.paulstramer.net
http://www.paulstramer.net/2025/01/international-public-notice-more.html
http://www.paulstramer.net/2025/01/international-public-notice.html
International Public Notice: Housecleaning for Donald Trump
By Anna Von Reitz
First, a note to Donald Trump: in order for people to do things lawfully (land) and legally (at sea), which we agree is necessary and good, those people have to have standing to take action.
Standing is a fundamental prerequisite of jurisdiction. The people taking the action must have standing — think of it as firm footing and actual interest in the action and the subject matter, meaning the actual physical substance that is being acted upon, in our case.
Now, we see that you are going to try to be inaugurated as President of The United States, meaning the entire country, because since 1851, the name of this country is The United States.
Presumably, you are going to try this end run based on the several “Republics” that U.S. Citizens have founded around the country and also presumably, you will try to claim that this is a proper action because some of them have claimed back their birthright nationality as American State Nationals.
While all that is well and good for Federal Citizens to do, it doesn’t give them standing to speak for any county in this country while they are still retaining any form of Federal Citizenship.
In order to do this and do it right, logic has to be followed and the Law and the history have to fit.
So let’s map it out for everyone:
(Copyright violation is why the post was greatly reduced) SUNMOD
Reply