Guterres Mangles Metaphors To Pitch Extreme Climate Alarmism
History will record that the United Nations has established itself as the greatest organizational perpetrator of junk science in modern times, if not of all time, with current Secretary-General Antonio Guterres (pictured) destined to be singled out for his contribution to the grossly-distorted UN climate alarmism
Since his appointment in 2019, Guterres and the UN have lived up to our standard formal definition of junk science.
It occurs when scientific facts are distorted, risk is exaggerated (or underplayed), and “the science” is adapted and warped by politics and ideology to serve another agenda.
That definition encompasses a wide range of activities among scientists, NGOs, politicians, journalists, media outlets, cranks, and quacks who manipulate science for political, environmental, economic, and social purposes.
It also nicely captures the entire United Nations climate crusade and the work of its institutional creation, the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC).
But no single official can top Guterres as a purveyor of IPCC hype and doom, a living embodiment of Hans Christian Andersen’s fabled emperor who believes he is fully, stylishly dressed but in fact, has no clothes.
Guterres, a former Socialist Party prime minister of Portugal (1995-2002) and president of the Socialist International (1999-2005) was in typically ridiculous form on June 5th when he delivered a speech at the Museum of Natural History in Manhattan, at an event billed as “A Moment of Truth” and a “special address on climate action.”
Guterres talked about a planet on a “highway to climate hell,” rehashing a line he used in 2022 in Egypt at the COP27 climate conference:
“We are on a highway to climate hell with our foot still on the accelerator.”
Guterres also has no qualms about mixing and mangling metaphors.
He simultaneously told the Manhattan audience that humans are:
“like the meteor that wiped out the dinosaurs, we’re having an outsized impact. In the case of climate, we are not the dinosaurs. We are the meteor. We are not only in danger. We are the danger.”
The longer Guterres rambles on, the more confusing, contradictory, and senseless the metaphors become:
“We are playing Russian roulette with our planet. We need an exit ramp off the highway to climate hell.
And the truth is … we have control of the wheel.”
Other Guterres’ climate spins include:
“Humanity has opened the gates of hell” and “become a weapon of mass extinction.”
And:
“We must go into emergency mode and put out this five-alarm fire.”
Is Guterres describing reality — or the content of a new AI computer game in which some crazed, teenaged human monster drives a flaming meteor through the ozone layer, knocking off dinosaurs before crashing onto a highway and plowing into a Russian Museum of Political Roulette just outside the Gates of Hell?
As UN secretary-general, Guterres sits atop a hierarchy of agencies such as the IPCC climate science megaplex, which was created in 1988 by two other UN agencies, the World Meteorological Organization (WMO) and the United Nations Environment Program (UNEP).
UNEP was cobbled together in 1972 as the brainchild of Maurice Strong, the late Canadian global environmental schemer, who famously mused about a fictional environmental crisis that led a group of global insiders to decide the only hope for the planet is “that the industrialized civilizations collapse”.
The current “degrowth” movement is a version of deindustrialization that reflects Guterres’ off-ramp from the highway to hell. In fact, the word “degrowth” appears 28 times in the IPCC’s sixth and latest Assessment Report.
With these UN agencies as his guide, Guterres’ verbal jumble of science statements is no better than his mixed metaphors.
His abuse of climate and environmental facts has often been commented upon, including in a YouTube video titled “Who is Antonio Guterres?” posted earlier this year by Ottawa journalist John Robson on his Climate Discussion Nexus site.
Robson reviews and highlights some garbled inaccuracies and misrepresentations Guterres routinely cranks out.
For instance:
“Climate-related natural disasters are becoming more frequent, more deadly, more destructive with growing human and financial cost.”
And:
“The number of weather, climate, and water-related disasters has increased by a factor of five over the past 50 years.”
When it comes to policies to deal with his fantastic vision of planetary destruction, Guterres aligns with Maurice Strong’s degrowth agenda.
In his Manhattan speech, he repeated the UN call for a “fossil-fuel phase-out” since “economic logic makes the end of the fossil fuel age inevitable.”
He urged financial institutions to “stop bankrolling” fossil fuel industries. “Fossil fuels are not only poisoning our planet,” he told bankers, “they’re toxic for your brand.”
The planet would be much better off if national governments stopped bankrolling Guterres and the United Nations and their constant poisoning of our science, economics, and politics.
See more here climatechangedispatch
Please Donate Below To Support Our Ongoing Work To Defend The Scientific Method
PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL, legally registered in the UK as a company 
incorporated for charitable purposes. Head Office: 27 Old Gloucester Street, London WC1N 3AX.
Trackback from your site.
James
| #
With World population going from 2 to 8 billion in a century, and glaciers that provide fresh water disappearing, some sort of crisis is on its way. Already a lot of forest and agricultural areas have disappeared in the last 5k years; where next? Europe, Ukraine, Central China? Better define it in real terms before acting, not panic. First off, where will the fresh water come from?
Reply
Seriously
| #
Terence, Terence, Terence, there will be NO HISTORY in the future, other than what The Machine decides is ‘history’. Your very 1st sentence shows that you are not paying enough attention to what technology can do, will do, in the Very near future.😉
Reply