Guess who’s pushing back against YouTube’s suppression
YouTube keeps removing information people need about the virus, as we know, but now the Wall Street Journal, rather a significant platform, is blasting them for it.
The most recent example comes in the form of an article by Jay Bhattacharya of Stanford, who later this week will once again be my guest on the Tom Woods Show.
Bhattacharya writes about the panel of scientists advising Ron DeSantis, governor of Florida, and the roundtable discussion they recently had that YouTube decided needed to be hidden from the public.
The other panelists were Sunetra Gupta of Oxford, Martin Kulldorff of Harvard and Scott Atlas of Stanford.
Writes Bhattacharya:
But last week YouTube removed a recording of this routine policy discussion from its website. The company claimed my fellow panel members and I were trafficking in misinformation. The company said it removed the video “because it included content that contradicts the consensus of local and global health authorities regarding the efficacy of masks to prevent the spread of COVID-19.”
Yet the panelists are all experts, and all spoke against requiring children to wear masks.
The scientific evidence is clear. Consider a study from Iceland conducted early in the epidemic when masking was uncommon. The study used a representative sample to track the source of Covid infections. The authors used contact-tracing methods paired with genetic sequencing analysis to establish precisely how the disease spread. The senior author of the study, Kari Stefansson, later told reporters that “even if children do get infected, they are less likely to transmit the disease to others than adults. We have not found a single instance of a child infecting parents.” Many studies in the scientific literature reach a similar conclusion: Even unmasked children pose less of a risk for disease spread than adults.
And he continues from there.
Bhattacharya has been a hero throughout the entire crisis, and has taken enormous abuse and been on the receiving end of wild accusations — for example, that he must be in the pay of radical libertarians (as if one would need to be bribed in order to point out that lockdowns destroy lives).
Please Donate Below To Support Our Ongoing Work To Expose The Lies About COVID19
PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL, legally registered in the UK as a company 
incorporated for charitable purposes. Head Office: 27 Old Gloucester Street, London WC1N 3AX.
Trackback from your site.
T. C. Clark
| #
I recently read that a woman in Connecticut received a 2 shot vaccination but still contracted the virus…from her 3 and 6 year old daughters who were attending a school. I read that up to 30% of people who get the virus suffer long term recognizable cognitive problems. I remember Youtube before it was Googled….it was the wild wild west….I knew it would never be the same because Google knows what is best for you…or will refer you to Wikipedia if needed, no? Google is the Final Arbiter of all things big or small….the Great Censor in the Sky.
Reply
Phil Inman
| #
Being what I figure now must be totally skeptical so much so that I think I got everything figured out. Ha. But one thing still I’m not getting. Why is Trump blowing his own horn about this vaccine like his rush to damage America is something he thinks the deplorables will applaud? does he really think that? Doesn’t he know this information about no immunity conferred and serious side effects more common than being disclosed? How can he not know this? Going to be interesting to watch the blind man tumble into the ditch.
Reply
Herb Rose
| #
Hi Phil,
Although Trump was a good president he was also a totally egotistical asshole who was always saying how great he was. That’s why people despised him.
Herb
Reply