‘Greed’ & capitalism behind ‘vaccine success’, PM tells Brits

The UK’s successful vaccine rollout was thanks to “greed” and “capitalism”, Boris Johnson has told Conservative MPs during a private call. Several of those present confirmed the prime minister had made the remarks during an end-of-term Zoom meeting with Tory backbenchers, known as the 1922 Committee, on Tuesday evening, two days before the Commons breaks for Easter.

Johnson hailed the fact that more than 28 million people have been given a first jab in the UK, saying: “The reason we have the vaccine success is because of capitalism, because of greed my friends.”

Immediately afterwards, he tried to backpedal and withdraw what he had said, according to MPs, one of whom added that the PM then made a joke about how details of the 1922 Committee virtual meetings often leak.

Downing Street has not denied the account but refused to issue a comment.

Opposition MPs condemned the PM’s remarks, pointing out that they came on the anniversary of the first coronavirus lockdown.

Labour backbencher Barry Sheerman called it an “obnoxious comment on this day of all days”, while his colleague Angela Eagle tweeted: “Altruism not greed will get us through this.”

Liberal Democrat MP Layla Moran also said the prime minister’s intervention was “not helpful”.

Some of those on the call sought to add context to Johnson’s words, saying he had been talking generally about how big pharmaceutical firms managed to safely create vaccines at record speed – and not the ongoing row with the EU. One called it “a lighthearted off-the-cuff comment”.

But the remarks still risk escalating tensions with Brussels, given Johnson has previously been keen to avoid getting drawn into a war of words with European leaders, despite the threat of a vaccine export ban on the continent.

On Tuesday, Johnson suggested he would not engage in a tit-for-tat export ban, with sources saying the priority was still to calm tensions rather than escalate with threats.

Speaking at a No 10 press conference hours earlier to mark the one-year anniversary of lockdown, Johnson said: “We in this country don’t believe in blockades of any kind of vaccines or vaccine material, that’s not something that this country would dream of engaging in.”

At another point in the call with Tory MPs, Johnson admitted the local elections due to take place in May would be difficult, one MP said.

They also said he laid into the BBC, describing it as “detached from a lot of viewers” and suggesting corporation bosses should “move more in line”.

See more here: theguardian-com

Please Donate Below To Support Our Ongoing Work To Expose The Lies About COVID19

PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL, legally registered in the UK as a company incorporated for charitable purposes. Head Office: 27 Old Gloucester Street, London WC1N 3AX. 

Trackback from your site.

Comments (4)

  • Avatar

    Alan

    |

    One comment I saw described it as desperation, which seems more accurate.

    Reply

  • Avatar

    chris

    |

    He’s admitting that he is a communist and was checking to see if his comment would have generated much support. If it did then he would go forward with more commie ideas and if it didn’t get much support then he would just not make more of these obviously radical comments and go back to the slow change method. The US is suffering from the same type of thing. commies are eliminating rights, changing from a free nation. The only thing that a free nation can become is an enslaved nation.

    Reply

  • Avatar

    judy Ryan

    |

    Looking at the situation over time. I remember that initially Boris Johnson instigated a sensible stand for Britain . He suggested that it’s citizens would develope a herd immunity over time. I think that, like our PM in Australia, he was put under immense pressure by evil socialist forces to abandon that stand. What is happening in Australia as well as in Britain is that the evil enforcers are imposing a herd mentality on the people. “Join us, as our minions, in our attack on any independent thinking individual”. The more influential that person is, the more harsh our naming and shaming must be.”

    Reply

  • Avatar

    very old white guy

    |

    I wonder just what is considered successful about the potential poisoning of a portion , yet to be determined, of your population.

    Reply

Leave a comment

Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment.
Share via