Globalist Body Fakes Drought Crisis, Refutes UN Climate Science

The World Economic Forum (WEF) – a globalist organization comprised of the world’s leading political figures, billionaires, and international corporations – published an article today claiming a global drought crisis that is explicitly refuted by the United Nations Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC).

If Twitter, Facebook, and other tech media giants apply their cancel culture rules with any consistency, the tech media giants would quickly erase any mentions of the WEF’s fake claims on their platforms.

Today’s WEF article is titled, “Water wars: How conflicts over resources are set to rise amid climate change.”

The very first sentence of the article reads, “From erratic rainfall to severe droughts, global warming is increasing competition for water around the world.” The WEF, however, provides no scientific sources for its claim.

So, let’s check what the United Nations IPCC reports regarding rainfall and severe droughts.

As reported in Climate at a Glance: Drought, the U.N. IPCC reports with “high confidence” that precipitation has increased over mid-latitude land areas of the Northern Hemisphere (including the United States) during the past 70 years. Also, the IPCC reports “low confidence” about any negative trends globally.

There you have it, in black and white. The IPCC, the asserted “gold standard” for climate science, states explicitly:   

There is high confidence that mean precipitation over the mid-latitude land areas of the Northern Hemisphere has increased since 1951 (Hartmann et al., 2013). For other latitudinal zones, area-averaged long-term positive or negative trends have low confidence ….”

The rest of the WEF article claims all sorts of worldwide water sob stories, all dependent on the false assertion of less global rainfall and more severe global drought.

The WEF is ramping up the telling of climate lies to justify a January meeting in which they intend to devise a “Great Reset of global capitalism.”

The plan is to promote global wealth equality by a massive redistribution of wealth from Western democracies to the rest of the world, where a stifling of economic freedom has brought poverty and misery.

The WEF plans to implement this by transforming the world’s economies to a socialist New World Order, centered on climate justice. Telling false climate tales appears to be WEF’s main strategy for making this happen.

Regardless of the World Economic Forum’s nefarious Great Reset plans, its claim that climate change is causing less rainfall and more drought is explicitly refuted by the UN IPCC.

Spread the word and the truth…

Read more at Climate Realism


PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL, legally registered in the UK as a company incorporated for charitable purposes. Head Office: 27 Old Gloucester Street, London WC1N 3AX. 

Please DONATE TODAY To Help Our Non-Profit Mission To Defend The Scientific Method.

Trackback from your site.

Comments (5)

  • Avatar

    Andy Rowlands

    |

    It comes to something when an organisation makes claims that ‘scientists’ on ‘their side’ don’t even claim!

    Reply

  • Avatar

    tom0mason

    |

    Drought? There is no reliable data that shows droughts are more severe or increasing.

    However there is the admission by some modellers that they do NOT understand clouds. Admitting some cloud error is as close as most climate modellers come to admitting their projections are not just junk. From the debate on this study https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1748-9326/ab97c9 at
    https://theconversation.com/why-clouds-are-the-missing-piece-in-the-climate-change-puzzle-140812

    But current climate models don’t agree on where that threshold lies. In new research, we discovered one of the reasons why there is such a large range of estimates for how much carbon can be safely emitted: the uncertain behaviour of clouds. In some climate models, clouds strongly amplify warming. In others, they have a neutral effect or even dampen warming slightly.

    Also over at NoTrickZone an Austrian analyst just might be moving towards the reasons why ‘climate models’ have it all so wrong.

    Even the IPCC states clouds would block a 50W/m2 of SW radiation, retain a 30W/m2 of LWIR and thus have a net CRE (Cloud Radiative Effect) of -20W/m2 [1]. Of course those -50W/m2 of SW CRE are already included in the formula above (part of the 30% albedo), while the 30W/m2 of LW CRE are not.

    and

    There are indeed some issues with the CRE I need to talk about and things are not nearly as settled as I just suggested.

    1. Whatever experts name a net CRE of about -20 W/m2, they refer to the same sources, which are ERBE and CERES satellite data.
    2. This are not satellite data at all, but models which are getting fed with some satellite data, among others.
    3. These models were largely developed by the same people who predicted the negative CRE in the first place. They might not even have a (significant) GHGE if the result would not turn out how it did.
    4. A closer look on these model results show totally inconsistent outcomes over time. Regions with massively negative local CREs turned into having positive CREs, and vice verse.[3]
    5. The only thing which really held constant over time was the overall negative CRE of the named magnitude. Of course, that is a precondition to the GHGE and cannot be put into question, if “climate science” wants to have an agenda.

    So he reappraises the the whole CRE area and comes-up with (what some people will find as) some startling answers.

    https://notrickszone.com/2020/09/11/austrian-analyst-things-with-greenhouse-effect-ghe-arent-adding-up-something-totally-wrong/

    Reply

    • Avatar

      Herb Rose

      |

      Hi Tom,
      Cloud formations is simple thermodynamics.Water at the Earth’s surface absorbs IR energy and evaporates. It transports that energy (along with more gathered in the troposphere) to the stratosphere where the energy is released by the reverse process of condensation into water droplet (clouds) to be radiated
      Herb.

      Reply

    • Avatar

      Jerry Krause

      |

      Hi TomO,

      You have correctly stated: “Drought? There is no reliable data that shows droughts are more severe or in increasing.”

      There us reliable data that random (unpredictable) El Nino and La Nina events, for which there is abundant data, produce less than ‘normal’ weather world wide. So, there is abundant data that you are correct.

      Have a good day, Jerry

      Reply

  • Avatar

    Dean Michael Jackson

    |

    The astronomical cost of shifting to non-carbon based energy sources would literally send humanity back to the Stone Age, with consequent population decline; annihilation of the species, per the Satanic purpose for destroying the globe’s economies. Let’s make this abundantly clear by noting the shocking cost for just one critical component of the United State’s energy needs:

    STRATEGIC PETROLEUM RESERVE

    The United States Strategic Petroleum Reserve is currently at 635.2 million barrels of oil. 635 million barrels of oil equals 1,079,123,092,000 megawatts. 1,079,123,092,000/100 = 10,791,230,920; 10,791,230,920 X $3.6 billion[1] = $3,884,831,310,000,000,000,000,000,000 (octillion).

    The United States’ Gross Domestic Product (GDP) for 2017 was $19,390,000,000,000 (trillion). Battery storage to replace the strategic petroleum reserve would cost more than 100,000 GDPs!

    THERMODYNAMICS AWOL

    Climate change mechanics conspires to do away with the physics of the atmosphere, where action and reaction is abandoned. When a new gas molecule is introduced into the dense troposphere, dislocation takes place, where if the new molecule is denser than the atmosphere (contains less heat energy), such as carbon dioxide, the gas molecule sinks displacing upwards the warmer nitrogen and oxygen molecules, thereby cooling the area of dislocation. Conversely, if the new gas molecule has more heat energy than the nitrogen-oxygen based atmosphere (such as methane), the new molecule rises, displacing relatively cooler nitrogen and oxygen molecules downwards, which displaces upwards relatively more heat retaining nitrogen and oxygen molecules, thereby cooling the area of dislocation. Thermodynamics in action in the atmosphere that keeps the Earth cool when increased radiation isn’t the new variable introduced.

    SOCIOPATHS IDENTIFIED

    The identity of the mass murderers that have co-opted the globe’s institutions identify themselves as Marxists, most being unaware that they are, in fact, manipulated by a top level leadership cadre composed of humanity’s arch enemy’s combatants, Satanists.

    Troubled by a personal moral breakdown once freed from parental constraints (a libertine), the man the world knows as a racist and callous and domineering psychopath was formerly a devout and lovely young follower of Christ. Then Marx’s personality changed for the worse, seeking not atheism, but revenge against God and His children on Earth:

    “Thus Heaven I’ve forfeited,
    I know it full well,
    My soul, once true
    to God, Is chosen for hell.”

    …and…

    “With disdain I will throw my gauntlet
    Full in the face
    of the world,
    And see the collapse
    of this pygmy giant
    Whose fall will
    not stifle my ardour.
    Then will I wander
    godlike and victorious
    Through the ruins
    of the world
    And, giving my
    words an active force,
    I will feel equal
    to the Creator.”

    Marx wrote those poems AFTER he transferred university from Bonn to Berlin, telling us (1) Marx always remained a theist, feigning atheism; and (2) that we were lied to when told that once Marx entered university that’s when he became an atheist. As for the rank and file Marxists, they’re marionettes, whose strings are pulled by the Marxist leadership class who are actually Satanists; Satanists have been active within our institutions for millennia, as Jesus warned us.

    At my blog, read the articles…

    SINKHOLE: THE GREEN NEW DEAL’S RENEWABLE ENERGY COSTS ON LOCAL GOVERNMENTS’ BUDGETS

    ‘House of Cards: The Collapse of the ‘Collapse’ of the USSR’

    ‘Playing Hide And Seek In Yugoslavia’

    Then read the article, ‘The Marxist Co-Option Of History And The Use Of The Scissors Strategy To Manipulate History Towards The Goal Of Marxist Liberation’

    Solution

    The West will form new political parties where candidates are vetted for Marxist ideology/blackmail, the use of the polygraph to be an important tool for such vetting. Then the West can finally liberate the globe of vanguard Communism.

    My blog…

    https://djdnotice.blogspot.com/2018/09/d-notice-articles-article-55-7418.html

    [1] $3.6 billion is the cost for a 100 megawatts battery. In 2006, during peak power in the summer, Washington, DC used approximately 6,888 MW of power: 6,888/100 MW = 68 MW; 68MW X $3.6 billion = $244.8 billion for Washington, DC to switch from petroleum to renewable energy sources. Washington, DC’s annual budget is $12.8 billion.

    Reply

Leave a comment

Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment.
Share via