Give them an inch, they will take every mile (right) you ever had
In the UK, if your child has not been jabbed against measles, authorities want them isolated if exposed to someone (most likely someone vaccinated) who has it
That pinnacle of propaganda, the BBC, has reported that in London, children who have not had the MMR vaccine will be isolated for 21 days if they are exposed to (not sick with) someone who has contracted measles.
Of course, the UK is much like the US and Australia and most other highly vaccinated countries in that the vast majority of those who get these so-called infectious illnesses have been fully and ‘appropriately’ vaccinated against them.
Whoever authored this Science article expressed surprise at the fact that a vaccinated person both contracted and transmitted measles.
But this phenomenon has been known about since the 1960s not long after the introduction of the measles vaccine and it was opined that in the future, it would mainly be the vaccinated who got measles.
A prediction that came to pass.
But never let inconvenient facts get in the way of a lucrative and bigoted campaign! You see, during the scamdemic, parents did not keep their children up-to-date with childhood vaccinations.
Based on this, a major outbreak is predicted using predictive technology (crystal balls) and therefore, those who have insisted on thinking for themselves and not exposing their children to the toxic brew in the MMR vaccine, will have to face quarantining of their children according to this report.
Questions to ask:
- What proof will be required to prove someone has been ‘exposed’ to measles?
- How do we know that the person who actually had the infection wasn’t already vaccinated against it (meaning that it is useless to jab in the first place since it is the jabbed getting sick)?
- Will there be laboratory proof required to show that it is measles or will the diagnosis simply be based on clinical symptoms (there are literally dozens of infections that look exactly like measles)?
- Why 21 days when the incubation period for measles is 10-14 days?
- What if the person who was ‘exposed’ has already had measles? Will there be an allowance for natural immunity? After all, infection provides lifelong immunity – something that no vaccine can do. This despite the fact that the liars at the BBC state that : This (the MMR vaccine) protects them for life against measles and prevents the spread of the virus to other people. This is verifiably false and they need to be called on it.
- Will all vaccinated people be regularly subjected to blood tests to determine whether they still have serum antibodies to measles – not an indicator of immunity but it’s the only metric used by medicine to ‘prove’ immunity?
How dangerous is measles?
So, we are once again talking about discriminating against people on the basis of their vaccination status. A Nazi-like move that every single freedom-loving person should condemn.
Especially since the infectivity of measles virus has never been proved (see the lawsuit in Germany by Stefan Lanka which he initially won but which has been lost on appeal) and even if it were, it is known for a fact that in healthy, well-nourished children, measles infections are generally a non-event.
Prior to the introduction of the measles vaccine in 1963 in the US and 1970 in Australia, measles was considered nothing more than a rite of passage; a common and benign infection that was not harmful to the vast majority of those who got it.
From the MacMillan Guide to Family Health (1982), nearly 20 years after the introduction of measles-containing vaccines:
“Measles is a highly contagious disease which chiefly affects the skin and respiratory tract.
.…In the vast majority of children who catch measles, the disease disappears within 10 days and the only after effect is lifelong immunity to another attack.”
Sounds terrifying, doesn’t it?
How we respond to these new ‘rules’ will determine our lives going forward
The same people who are ringing the alarm about measles infections made people run and hide because of the common cold! And they will try it on again because it was so successful last time.
According to the article quoted above:
The UKHSA also says that a large outbreak could put pressure on the NHS, with between 20 and 40 percent of infected people needing hospital care.
In other words, we need to flatten the curve…
What this article says is so far from the truth, it’s hard to even know where to start!
This article is filled with lies to spark fear in parents who are not aware of the real risks of the MMR and MMRV vaccines and the actual benefits of getting measles infections in childhood (many studies indicate that infection after 18 months of age can reduce the risk of autoimmunity and cancer in later life).
Before vaccination, it was vanishingly rare for a child to be hospitalised because of measles infections. Not non-existent, but very rare. Because again, measles infections were not usually followed by complications in healthy children.
If they can make us isolate our healthy children, force us or them to wear face nappies outdoors, and get us agreeing to be tested, tracked and traced ‘for our health’, it’s all over Red Rover.
This is where the rubber meets the road. We either draw the line in the sand right here and right now or we agree that our freedoms aren’t worth fighting for and our bodies and those of our children belong to the state to do with as they please.
See more here substack.com
Header image: Cone Health
Bold emphasis added
Please Donate Below To Support Our Ongoing Work To Defend The Scientific Method
PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL, legally registered in the UK as a company 
incorporated for charitable purposes. Head Office: 27 Old Gloucester Street, London WC1N 3AX.
Trackback from your site.