From ‘Black Ops’ to Bernie’s Byline: Big Pharma Targets RFJ Jr

Written by Sayer Ji on September 16, 2025. Posted in Current News

Bernie Sanders’s September 12, 2025 Guardian op-ed calling for RFK Jr.’s resignation represents something far more sinister than political disagreement.

It is the culmination of a documented foreign influence operation that began with CCDH’s explicit “black ops” planning in January 2024, coordinated through UK intelligence agencies that trained U.S. officials in censorship tactics, funded by pharmaceutical dark money, and executed through the very foreign media platform CCDH’s operational documents explicitly named for narrative placement—demonstrating the complete capture of American democratic processes by foreign corporate interests.

The Documented Trail

The evidence is no longer circumstantial. We now have:

January 8, 2024: CCDH CEO Imran Ahmed, in an internal meeting, explicitly states: “RFK — black ops being set up to look at RFK. Nervousness about the impact of him on the election.”¹

August 10, 2021: The UK Counter Disinformation Unit delivers a presentation to the Biden-Harris National Security Council, providing a blueprint for circumventing the First Amendment through “trusted flagging relationships” and coordinated censorship targeting “anti-vaccination content.”²

May 2024: Rather than facing prosecution as an unregistered foreign agent, Ahmed receives a $300,000 prize from organizations with deep state ties.³

September 2025: Sanders publishes in The Guardian—the very outlet CCDH’s planning documents explicitly named as a target for placement of their narratives—calling for RFK Jr.’s removal, months after the same memo documented “black ops being set up” against Kennedy.⁴

The Guardian: Not Just a Platform, But a Weapon

When Sanders chose The Guardian as his platform, he wasn’t merely selecting a progressive outlet with international reach. He was completing an operation years in the making. The Guardian isn’t just reporting on the pharmaceutical industry’s interests—it has become their enforcement mechanism.

Consider the UK Counter Disinformation Unit’s explicit instructions to the Biden administration: establish “trusted flagging relationships” where governments direct platforms on what to censor. The Guardian has transcended even this model—it doesn’t need government direction because it operates as part of the censorship apparatus itself.

The extraordinary presentation obtained through FOIA reveals that the UK’s censorship infrastructure includes intelligence services, the Prime Minister’s National Security Unit, and coordination with 20+ countries.⁵ When Sanders publishes in The Guardian, he’s not writing an op-ed—he’s participating in a transatlantic intelligence operation with global ties and penetrance.

The Pharmaceutical Money Trail

CCDH’s funding streams trace back to pharmaceutical dark money organizations aligned with industry interests.⁶ When these same interests see their profit model threatened by a health secretary who questions vaccine safety, they activate their network. The operation moves from London boardrooms through UK intelligence channels, gets laundered through “anti-hate” nonprofits, and emerges as a seemingly organic political opinion piece.

Sanders writes that Kennedy “rejects science,” but what Kennedy actually rejects is pharmaceutical capture of scientific institutions. The same week Sanders’s piece appears, documents reveal DHS and FEMA funded censorship programs aligned with CCDH’s mission.⁷ This isn’t about science—it’s about protecting a business model worth hundreds of billions.

Military Technology Against Civilians

The DISARM framework, originally developed by NATO for military conflicts, has been repurposed to target domestic dissent.⁸ When Sanders accuses Kennedy of spreading “conspiracy theories,” he’s using language directly from military psychological operations manuals—manuals that classify questioning pharmaceutical products as a “narrative threat.”

The UK presentation explicitly advised targeting “anti-vaccination content” as causing “significant physical or psychological harm.” This isn’t public health language—it’s military terminology for identifying enemy combatants. Except the “enemies” are American citizens exercising First Amendment rights.

Sanders’s Transformation: From Revolutionary to Enforcer

The tragedy isn’t just that Sanders participated in this operation—it’s that he represents its complete victory. The man who once railed against corporate power now serves as their most valuable asset: a progressive icon laundering pharmaceutical interests through socialist rhetoric.

When Sanders writes that Kennedy is “unfit” because he questions germ theory, he’s not making a scientific argument. He’s executing a script written in London, funded by pharmaceutical companies, and coordinated through transatlantic intelligence channels. The British didn’t need to invade America—they just needed to convince American politicians to enforce British censorship standards voluntarily.

The Sovereignty Question

This transcends partisan politics. When foreign entities can orchestrate the removal of U.S. Cabinet officials through coordinated media campaigns, we’ve lost sovereignty. When UK intelligence agencies teach American bureaucrats how to circumvent constitutional protections, we’ve been colonized. When pharmaceutical companies can activate senators like assets, democracy becomes theater.

The Guardian op-ed isn’t journalism—it’s the public face of a coup. Not the dramatic kind with tanks and generals, but the quiet kind that NATO’s Strategic Communications doctrine calls “tanks with tweets”—where information warfare replaces physical invasion, where social media becomes the battlefield, and where dissenting voices are treated as enemy combatants to be neutralized through reputational destruction rather than kinetic action.

This is the new warfare: foreign money flows through NGOs, intelligence agencies share “best practices” for circumventing constitutional protections, and senators suddenly discover urgent reasons to attack officials who threaten corporate profits. NATO’s StratCom division, where Charles Kriel and other architects of these operations cut their teeth, explicitly trains operatives to view online discourse as a theater of war. Under this doctrine, your or I questioning vaccine safety becomes equivalent to enemy communications that must be suppressed. RFK Jr. challenging pharmaceutical orthodoxy becomes a security threat requiring “black ops” response.

When Sanders publishes in The Guardian, he’s not participating in democratic debate—he’s completing a military operation conducted through civilian proxies, where the weapons are words, the battlefield is public consciousness, and the casualties are truth and sovereignty itself.

The Path Forward

Sanders calling for Kennedy’s resignation through The Guardian is the system telling us it won. But documentation of their methods is also their weakness. Every leaked memo, every FOIA revelation, every financial trail exposes the machinery of control.

The question isn’t whether Sanders knew he was participating in a foreign influence operation.⁹ The question is whether American democracy can survive when its representatives serve as willing instruments of pharmaceutical colonialism, when British intelligence determines U.S. health policy, and when “progressive” media platforms execute corporate black operations.

When a sitting U.S. Senator publishes in a foreign outlet documented as part of a censorship operation targeting a U.S. official explicitly named in “black ops” planning, we’re not witnessing democracy. We’re watching its desecration in real time, authored by those who swore to defend it.

The Guardian got their headline. The pharmaceutical companies protected their profits. The British intelligence services demonstrated their reach. And Bernie Sanders, whether knowingly or through stunning naivety, became the face of foreign interference in American governance.

This is what capture looks like. This is what surrender looks like. This is what the end of sovereignty looks like—not with a bang, but with an op-ed.

source  sayerji.substack.com

Please Donate Below To Support Our Ongoing Work To Defend The Scientific Method

PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL, legally registered in the UK as a company incorporated for charitable purposes. Head Office: 27 Old Gloucester Street, London WC1N 3AX. 

Trackback from your site.