France Warned US in 2015 About Wuhan Lab It Helped Build
The U.S. federal government should have stopped funding research at the Wuhan Institute of Virology in 2015 when China reduced its cooperation with the French in building and operating the lab, according to the leader of an investigation into COVID-19’s origins by the State Department under the Trump administration.
In 2015, French intelligence officials warned the U.S. State Department and their own foreign ministry that China was cutting back on agreed collaboration at the lab, former State official David Asher, now a senior fellow at the Hudson Institute think tank, told the Daily Caller News Foundation.
By 2017, the French “were kicked out” of the lab and cooperation ceased, leading French officials to warn the State Department that they had grave concerns as to Chinese motivations, according to Asher.
The State Department alleged in January 2021, at the end of the Trump administration, that the Wuhan lab had engaged in classified research on behalf of the Chinese military since at least 2017.
The State Department did not respond to The Daily Caller News Foundation’s request for comment.
On Thursday, China said it would not allow the World Health Organization (WHO) to inspect the lab further.
China has blocked the WHO from accessing important records at the lab.
“The Chinese basically sucked State into its honey pot operation to gain access to U.S. technology, knowledge, and material support. Classic. Just as they have done in every sector,” Asher said.
Between October 2009 and May 2019, the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID) provided $1.1 million to the U.S.-based EcoHealth Alliance for a sub-agreement with the Wuhan Institute of Virology, according to USAID.
EcoHealth Alliance also received funding from the Department of Defense’s Defense Threat Reduction Agency that was subcontracted to the Wuhan lab, New York magazine reported.
National Institutes of Health (NIH) grants to EcoHealth Alliance totaling $600,000 between 2014 and 2019 were subcontracted to the Wuhan Institute of Virology.
The NIH, Defense Department, and USAID should have stopped sending U.S. federal funding to the Wuhan lab back when the French warned the State Department in 2015, Asher said.
State Department officials “in charge of nonproliferation should have shut down all cooperation,” he added.
The Wuhan Institute of Virology, which is at the center of speculation that COVID-19 may have originated from a lab accident, was initiated in 2004 as a joint project between France and China.
France provided the lab’s design, biosafety training, and much of its technology.
The French envisioned the Wuhan institute as an open and transparent lab that would serve the global scientific community in studying potential pandemics, according to a State Department cable in April 2018, citing a Wuhan-based French consulate official who worked on science and technology cooperation with China.
While top French politicians supported the collaboration, French security and defense experts did not, the French newspaper Le Figaro reported.
National security officials did not want to share sensitive technology with an oppressive country that was not an ally and they feared the lab could one day be transformed into a “biological arsenal,” according to Le Figaro.
As early as 2009, the U.S. State Department, then under former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, expressed concerns about the Wuhan lab, asking what France knew of how China planned to “vet incoming foreign researchers” and avoid technology transfer to countries of biological weapons proliferation concern, according to emails released by WikiLeaks.
The project took more than a decade to complete, and in February 2017, high-level French and Chinese officials held a ceremony to mark the lab’s accreditation.
Then-French Prime Minister Bernard Cazeneuve said at the time that it was a celebration of Franco-Chinese scientific cooperation.
To support the China-French project, France would make its technical expertise available to China to support the continuous improvement of the laboratory’s quality and safety, Cazeneuve added.
It would also budget 1 million euros per year for five years, he said.
That would fund about 50 French scientists to help train the Chinese lab workers, the director of Inserm, a French public research organization that helped set up the Wuhan lab, told the French magazine Science & Sante in May 2017.
However, little by little, the laboratory completely escaped the control of the French scientists who were, according to an agreement between Paris and Beijing, to supervise the work of the Chinese researchers in Wuhan, according to Le Figaro. The fifty French researchers who were to work in the lab for five years never left, the newspaper reported.
In January 2018, a State Department cable warned of a lack of highly trained technicians to operate the lab in a cable first reported by The Washington Post.
The U.S. officials who had visited the lab and made the warning via the cable were not permitted to return, because they were asking “too many questions,” according to Asher.
See more here: theepochtimes.com
Header image: Hector Retamal/AFP/Getty Images
Please Donate Below To Support Our Ongoing Work To Expose The Lies About COVID19
PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL, legally registered in the UK as a company 
incorporated for charitable purposes. Head Office: 27 Old Gloucester Street, London WC1N 3AX.
Trackback from your site.
Alan
| #
More importantly we need to know where this virus originated and my money is on it being created in the USA. It is the virus that Obama was concerned about when he stopped funding of the gain of function research. I believe the virus was sent to Wuhan where it escaped. Neither China nor the USA is being open about this because they are both involved.
Reply
dnomsed
| #
IMHO, the origins of cv19 are fairly straightforward. These are by now, well known.
1. Fauci develops virus technology in US labs. Multiple patents.
2. Fauci pays for technology transfer to WVI.
3. US (Fauci), China (Gao), Gates (forget his rep’s name) meet and collude with WHO to force acceptance of a universal flu vaccine, by using a novel pandemic as the vehicle. All documented.
4. Event 21 in late 2019 practises the action plan.
5. Cv19 released in China. By actors yet to be determined.
6. WHO, declares worldwide pandemic, and under agreed protocols, all participating UN nations submit to the WHO. The WHO now runs the world.
Fauci has admitted publically that it was less risky, for the US, in case of a leak, to develop in China. Notice who the top 3 heavyweight countries are at the WHO.
The US government and China are both culpable in this attrocity. US around 70%, and China 30%. The US has been trying to hide its culpability, hence, all the multiple re-directions and obfuscations.
It is a huge power grab that has gone terribly wrong and has caused a worldwide pandemic of fear and financial destruction. Nurembourg 2 awaits.
Reply
sir_isO
| #
smh
“5. Cv19 released in China. By actors yet to be determined.”
Elaborate on what “cv19 released” means.
Coz I see texts of bullshit, almost like religion, to peddle shit like subjugation, fear and industrial products like vaccines, while the concept of cv19 is entirely hollow.
Reply
sir_isO
| #
I mean, considering it’s religious…
Explain to me this:
https://theocean.bandcamp.com/track/the-origin-of-god
Any believer in viruses or their functionality is faced with having to give an explanation.
Since I have an imagination and I kinda like look at things…
“Devolution or regressive hypothesis. This hypothesis proposes to explain the origin of viruses by suggesting that viruses evolved from free-living cells. However, many components of how this process might have occurred are a mystery.”
Really? So like when you ignore genetic material constantly breaking? Very mysterious.
“Escapist or progressive hypothesis. This hypothesis accounts for viruses having either an RNA or a DNA genome and suggests that viruses originated from RNA and DNA molecules that escaped from a host cell. However, this hypothesis doesn’t explain the complex capsids and other structures on virus particles.”
Oh wow, consider that…something breaking and being disparate. Perhaps even ejected or encapsulated. Holy shit, maybe even transported through physical mechanisms. Wow that’s crazy future scifi right there.
“Self-replication hypothesis. This hypothesis posits a system of self-replication similar to that of other self-replicating molecules, likely evolving alongside the cells they rely on as hosts; studies of some plant pathogens support this hypothesis.”
Self-replicating, reliant on the host you say? So if you had a wall, and the wall was the “host” of the brick…and the brick is broken in a specific way, physics will cause it to be consistent? I doubt that.
Reply
Devona
| #
I have made $13594 last month by working online from my home. I am a full time college student and by just doing this in my free time for few hours per week by TSq using my laptop, I payed off my student loans. Check this out and start making cash online in so incredibly simply way by just following instructions on this website…
For more detail visit this web ……. http://lil9.com/
Reply