Four New Discoveries About Safety and Efficacy of COVID Vaccines
Doctors for Covid Ethics has sent the following letter to tens of thousands of doctors in Europe, summarising four recent scientific findings critical to the COVID-19 vaccination program. The letter explains each finding as it relates to the biology of COVID-19 vaccines, including interactions with the immune system.
Taken together, the letter warns that these new pieces of evidence force all physicians administering COVID-19 vaccines to re-evaluate the merits of COVID-19 vaccination, in the interests of their own ethical standing, and their patients’ safety and health.
A video explanation of the underlying immunology by Professor Sucharit Bhakdi MD is here, with German subtitles here.
Dear Colleague:
Four recent scientific discoveries are herewith brought to your urgent attention. They alter the entire landscape of the COVID-19 pandemic, and they force us to reassess the merits of vaccination against SARS-CoV-2.
Summary
Rapid and efficient memory-type immune responses occur reliably in virtually all unvaccinated individuals who are exposed to SARS-CoV-2. The effectiveness of further boosting the immune response through vaccination is therefore highly doubtful. Vaccination may instead aggravate disease through antibody-dependent enhancement (ADE).
Discovery 1: SARS-CoV-2 spike protein circulates shortly after vaccination
SARS-CoV-2 proteins were measured in longitudinal plasma samples collected from 13 participants who received two doses of Moderna mRNA-1273 vaccine [1]. With 11 of the 13, the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein was detected in the blood within only one day after the first vaccine injection.
Significance.
Spike protein molecules were produced within cells that are in contact with the bloodstream—mostly endothelial cells—and released into the circulation. This means that a) the immune system will attack those endothelial cells, and b) the circulating spike protein molecules will activate thrombocytes. Both effects will promote blood clotting. This explains the many clotting-related adverse events—stroke, heart attack, venous thrombosis—that are being reported after vaccination.
Discovery 2: Rapid, memory-type antibody response after vaccination
Several studies have demonstrated that circulating SARS-CoV-2-specific IgG and IgA antibodies became detectable within 1-2 weeks after application of mRNA vaccines [1–3].
Significance.
Rapid production of IgG and IgA always indicates a secondary, memory-type response that is elicited through re-stimulation of pre-existing immune cells. Primary immune responses to novel antigens take longer to evolve and initially produce IgM antibodies, which is then followed by the isotype switch to IgG and IgA.
A certain amount of IgM was indeed detected alongside IgG and IgA in some studies [1,4]. Importantly, however, IgG rose faster than IgM [4], which confirms that the early IgG response was indeed of the memory type. This memory response indicates pre-existing, cross-reactive immunity due to previous infection with ordinary respiratory human coronavirus strains. The delayed IgM response most likely represents a primary response to novel epitopes which are specific to SARS-CoV-2.
Memory-type responses have also been documented with respect to T-cell-mediated immunity [5–7]. Overall, these findings indicate that our immune system efficiently recognizes SARS-CoV-2 as “known” even on first contact. Severe cases of the disease thus cannot be ascribed to lacking immunity. Instead, severe cases might very well be caused or aggravated by pre-existing immunity through antibody-dependent enhancement (ADE, see below).
Discovery 3: SARS-CoV-2 elicits robust adaptive immune responses regardless of disease severity
Serum antibody profiles were reported for 203 individuals following SARS-CoV-2 infection [8]. 202 (>99%) of the participants exhibited SARS-CoV-2 specific antibodies. With 193 individuals (95%), these antibodies prevented SARS-CoV-2 infection in cell culture and also inhibited binding of the spike protein to the ACE2 receptor. Furthermore, CD8+ T-cell responses specific for SARS-CoV-2 were clear and quantifiable in 95 of 106 (90%) HLA-A2-positive individuals.
Significance.
This study confirms the above assertion that the immune response to initial contact with SARS-CoV-2 is of the memory type. In addition, it shows that this reaction occurs with almost all individuals, and particularly also with those who experience no manifest clinical symptoms.
The goal of the vaccination is to stimulate production of antibodies to SARS-CoV-2, but we now know that such antibodies can and will be rapidly generated by everyone upon the slightest viral challenge, even without vaccination.
Severe lung infections always take many days to develop, which means that if the antibodies generated by the memory response are needed, they will arrive on time. Therefore, vaccination is unlikely to provide significant benefit with respect to the prevention of severe lung infection.
Discovery 4: Rapid increase of spike protein antibodies after the second injection of mRNA vaccines
IgG and IgA antibody titres were monitored before vaccination and after the first and the second injection of mRNA vaccines [3]. Antibody titres rose with some delay after the first injection, then plateaued, but rose again very shortly after the second injection.
Significance.
Even though the antibody response to the first injection is of the memory type, the small time lag after the injection may mitigate adverse reactions, because the abundance of spike protein on the cells in the blood vessel walls and in other tissues may have already passed its peak when the antibodies arrive.
The situation changes dramatically with the second injection. Then the spikes are produced and protrude into the bloodstream that is already swarming with both reactive lymphocytes and antibodies. The antibodies will cause the complement system [9,10] and also neutrophil granulocytes to attack the spike protein-bearing cells. The possible consequences of all-out self-attack by the immune system are frightening.
Antibody-dependent enhancement of disease
As described, memory-type immune responses ensure the rapid rise of antibody titres after initial exposure to SARS-CoV-2, rendering the benefit of vaccine-induced antibody response exceedingly doubtful. Regardless, we should not assume that high antibody titres against SARS-CoV-2 will always improve the clinical outcome. With several virus families—in particular with Dengue virus, but also with coronaviruses—antibodies can aggravate rather than mitigate disease.
This occurs because certain cells of the immune system take up antibody-tagged microbes and destroy them. If a virus particle to which antibodies have bound is taken up by such a cell, but it then manages to evade destruction, it may instead start to multiply within the cell. Overall, the antibody will then have enhanced the replication of the virus. Clinically, this antibody-dependent enhancement (ADE) can cause a hyperinflammatory response (a “cytokine storm”) that will amplify the damage to the lungs, liver and other organs of our body.
Attempts to develop vaccines to the original SARS virus, which is closely related to SARS-CoV-2, repeatedly failed due to ADE. The vaccines did induce antibodies, but when the vaccinated animals were subsequently infected with the virus, they became more ill than the unvaccinated controls (see e.g. [11]). The possibility of ADE was not adequately addressed in the clinical trials on any of the COVID-19 vaccines.
It is therefore prudent to avoid the danger of inducing ADE through vaccination and instead rely on proven forms of treatment [12] for dealing with clinically severe COVID-19 disease.
Conclusion
The collective findings discussed above clearly show that the benefits of vaccination are highly doubtful. In contrast, the harm the vaccines do is very well substantiated, with more than 15.000 vaccination-associated deaths now documented in the EU drug adverse events database (EudraVigilance), and over 7.000 more deaths within the UK and the US [13].
See more here: jamesfetzer.org
Please Donate Below To Support Our Ongoing Work To Expose The Lies About COVID19
PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL, legally registered in the UK as a company 
incorporated for charitable purposes. Head Office: 27 Old Gloucester Street, London WC1N 3AX.
Trackback from your site.
Allan Shelton
| #
There is never anything about how the “vaccine” affects those that have had blood transfusions.
I had Sepsis and recovered but during my recovery I had 19 blood transfusions.
Would I be more susceptible to side effects?
Reply
4TimesAYear
| #
I have wondered this myself. Since the spike protein does not stay where it’s supposed to, and many women are having period problems now, what would happen if another woman was given a transfusion from someone who received one of these MRNA vaccines? The other vaccines have problems of their own and one must wonder if by getting a transfusion from someone who had been vaccinated, would they then pass those problems on to the unvaccinated person? Scary to think about.
Reply
Qais
| #
I don’t see any reference for the recent new four studies❗
Reply
Jon
| #
Study #1
https://academic.oup.com/cid/advance-article/doi/10.1093/cid/ciab465/6279075
Reply
Jon
| #
Study #3
https://www.thelancet.com/journals/ebiom/article/PIIS2352-3964(21)00203-6/fulltext
Reply
Jon
| #
Study #4
https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2021.03.23.21254060v1
Reply
Alan
| #
I think Prof Bhakdi is correct when he says 99% are protected against the virus. The evidence is in the trial results published by Pfizer. They report that 36,621 people were randomised 1:1 between vaccine and placebo and only 162 people with the placebo were infected. That is about 0.9% of unvaccinated people become infected and ill. Moderna was similar with 185 infections in the placebo group of 15,210. Strange how there seems to be infections everywhere except with the people involved in the vaccine trials.
Reply
James Bogash
| #
Alan,
At first thought, this may sound plausible. However, it is more likely that…well..there just wasn’t that much virus hanging around to infect people. Which raises a whole other set of problems: If only single digit percentages of the people in the studies were actually exposed to the virus, this is too small a number to detect potential ADE
Reply
John Bailey
| #
Those trials were all faked and fudged. The vaccine producers and the tests they do have no audit or anybody checking what they were doing. It is left up to the organizers funded by big pharma to conduct the study and report the results. No one checks up on them. they invented that system.
Would you trust a criminal? Vaccine producers have been bought faking studies, hiding evidence for profit. Just look at the JJ case presently with Babby powder. (see below). I would not trust them until the data is verified and at the moment the mRNA vaccine producers are refusing to hand over any data on the studies beyond top level. When they reported 95% efficiency they did not report the other critical data which would give us a picture and context of the 95%. It means nothing with one single number. For all we know they may have excluded some to get better data. We just do not know and hence with the immunity from prosecution I would not trust the vaccines I bit. they got EUA through deceptive means as 30yr safe medicine HCQ and Ivermectin has been banned and totally bogus studies performed intentionally to wreck and make a 30yr safe drug seam dangerous. I’ve used HCQ for Malaria for years its called the Friday Friday pill in Africa. Totally safe. No danger to my heart, yet the studies said otherwise. We have countries that use Ivermectin having very low CV19 virus deaths and those charts are so clear to see.
It’s all a game to get you injected, get big profits, and have no comeback. It will backfire on them as immunity does not extend to intentionally know wrong is being committed yet doing it. You can not get immunity to genercid which is what is going on for a CV19 virus that is 99.9x % recoverable.
Johnson & Johnson – asbestos-containing baby powder
Johnson & Johnson is considering filing for bankruptcy due to the ongoing asbestos-containing baby powder debacle, Reuters reported. Allegedly there are plans to spin the massive company into a series of entities to lower payout settlements. The state of Texas permits companies to split and file for a “two-step bankruptcy” to off weight the burden. In addition to the thousands of lawsuits filed against Johnson & Johnson’s baby powder products, the company recalled a series of sunscreen products last week that were found to contain cancer-causing agents. The company has yet to officially comment on the matter of bankruptcy, but did state that they would discontinue talc-based powder in the US.
Reply
Herb Rose
| #
Hi John,
Asbestos is a form of SiO2 (sand) and is ubiquitous. The mined asbestos has jagged edges (unlike the worn edges of natural asbestos) that damage lung tissues resulting in mesothelioma, it does not cause other types of cancer. The lawsuit claiming it caused ovarian cancer is another example of our horrible legal system where someone filing a civil complaint cannot lose while the defendants cannot win. Lawyers are able to hire crooked experts the to convince the ignorant jurors to award huge sums based on emotion rather than reality.
Herb
Reply
Chris*
| #
Dr Jackie Stone from South Africa who works on the front line with critical stage covid patients, made a comment in passing that if you have had the BCG vaccine ( for TB) you are 10x less likely to get the virus than someone who has not had the BCG. I have noticed that BCG studies for Covid are/ have been carried in Canada., but haven’t seen anything since. Any one know any more?
I’m sceptical enough to believe that any benefit which would interfere in the big Parma gold mine will be buried with HCQ, Ivermectin etc.
Reply
Mark Tapley
| #
The issue of the fake virus is being confuses by technical jargon and media hype. Just go back to the basics. Neither the Rockefeller CDC, Gates WHO or anyone else can provide a sample of the alleged covid 19. That is because it does not exist. If it did exist they would not need to employ a fake test. Viruses do not exist but are merely the exosomes or cellular debris from cell break down. The so called viral isolation that is claimed to be a virus is just contaminated tissue sample no different from the original one done in 1954 by Enders.
When a cell is attacked by a toxin such as with the use of graphene oxide it will give the appearance of the so called spike protein regardless of what exosomes (viruses) are present. Vaccines have never worked but are just part of the allopathic germ theory fraud. This racket first instigated with the series of blood toxins produced by the Rockefeller (Levinson) Foundation and hyped by the MSM followed by many more fake vaccines has now generated into a multi billion dollar medical scam and another Zionist control mechanism.
https://www.bitchute.com/video/bWFaGd4cM2ZJ/
https://www.bitchute.com/video/jmDjX14aP4Cf/
Reply
Charles Higley
| #
Exosomes easily explain why the spike protein genetic sequences of coronaviruses are essentially identical to humans. They like to pretend that the viruses are hiding in our DNA and their sequences are the sequences we use as spike protein in other physiological functions. Wise of us to make use virus genes in our own physiology. We are thus back to the chicken and the egg. Which came first, the spike protein or the exosome? Virus, what virus?
Reply
barry paul robinson
| #
The creature that preceded the chicken was one chromosome short of a chicken and that happened in the egg.
Covid19 is a fraud perpetrated by Big Pharma/Gates/Fauci &Co on an ignorant populous that has been conditioned to believe in germ theory and any other fake science they care to dish out.
Professor Sucharit Bhakdi is a supporter of vaccines and should not be taken seriously..
Reply
Anna
| #
Best comment here! Precise. The vaccine racket will bring down the medical racket. All this has been demonstrated already but of course its censored information, we all need to do their research, this has been said from day one. Another thing going on is that they are putting graphene oxide into the vaccines, they put it in the flu shot as well, and this interacts with the wireless network/radiation, in essence they are gradually cooking people up, but the more vaccines they get, and the more they up the network, the more it will become apparent as people get sicker and sicker, of course they plan to blame the unvaccinated, but it will all be obvious for those who can make the connection, and understand the real basis of disease.
Reply
Mark Tapley
| #
Hello Charles:
Yes, its all a multi billion dollar racket. Microbiologist Stephan Lanka has shown how the tissue cultures all deteriorate to the same virus (exosome) result even when there was no “viral” material in the culture. That is one reason they have to keep coming up with new “variants”, the gain of function show and the Wuhan lab. They really have nothing to work with. Notice that after the multi billion dollar fake AIDS racket exposed by PCR inventor Mullis (conveniently deceased 3 months before “covid 19”) they invented several other fake viruses to pump everyone up for where we are today. The only difference is that the racketeers inserted a fake test to go with the imaginary virus.
Reply
Tom
| #
I will never trust these overbearing, arrogant pharma scientists to improve the functions of our immune systems. They like to play God and eventually screw up our bodies with their poison drugs and injections. I don’t see people living longer, healthier lives while taking pharma drugs. Most of them just hang on…barely.
Reply
lolwat
| #
As opposed to dying?
Reply
Angelo Paredes
| #
US deaths are actually higher than that according to VAERS, above 10k last time I checked
Reply
Elena Kissin
| #
do not trust them (Big Pharma and Fauci – they are in bed together!!!!!!…and we soon find out what they were doing there…resist and demand safety research and written consent.
Reply
Brian
| #
I am not a Doctor, nor am I in health care. I am your everyday God fearing American. In a world where it is hard to trust people I must look at the facts that I know to be true. And that is this, I am 49 years old, I am a friendly outgoing guy that knows alot of people . I do not know 1 person that has died from covid 19. But I do now know 3 people that all died within 3 weeks of receiving the vaccine. All of them were roughly my age and all of them died from heart attacks and blood clots.
Reply