First Lawsuit Filed Against FDA for Withholding Vaccine Safety Data
The nonprofit Children’s Health Defense has sued the US Food and Drug Administration for withholding the results of key COVID-19 vaccine safety analyses
Since the start of the COVID pandemic, the FDA has acted like a proxy for Big Pharma and blocked effective treatments for the virus while at the same time approving dangerous and ineffective COVID vaccines.
The FDA lied about Ivermectin and later lied that they lied about Ivermectin.
The FDA also ignored the thousands of deaths and tens of thousands of reported hospitalizations linked to the experimental COVID vaccines.
The FDA did not protect the US public. The FDA was a rubber stamp for Big Pharma.
How many Americans died and continue to die due to their negligence?
The Epoch Times reported:
The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has been sued for withholding the results of key COVID-19 vaccine safety analyses.
The FDA’s actions violate federal law, the new lawsuit, filed on Jan. 26 in federal court in Washington by the nonprofit Children’s Health Defense (CHD), alleges.
The suit is seeking the raw results from the FDA’s analyses of reports to the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS).
The system, which the FDA runs with the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, accepts reports of post-vaccination adverse events.
As part of its vaccine safety monitoring, the FDA pledged to run a type of analyses called Empirical Bayesian (EB) data mining on the reports to see if any safety signals were triggered.
Signals give agencies an idea of which problems may be caused by vaccines. Agencies are supposed to research signals to verify them or rule them unrelated to vaccination.
“A report to VAERS does not mean that a vaccine caused an adverse event. But VAERS can give CDC and FDA important information.
If it looks as though a vaccine might be causing a problem, FDA and CDC will investigate further and take action if needed,” the CDC says on its website.
The FDA denied CHD’s request for the results of the data mining, claiming the records are “intra-agency memoranda consisting of opinions, recommendations, and policy discussions within the deliberative process of FDA, from which factual information is not reasonably segregable.”
See more here thegatewaypundit.com
Header image: Sarah Silbiger / Getty Images
About the author: Jim Hoft is the founder and editor of The Gateway Pundit, one of the top conservative news outlets in America. Jim was awarded the Reed Irvine Accuracy in Media Award in 2013 and is the proud recipient of the Breitbart Award for Excellence in Online Journalism from the Americans for Prosperity Foundation in May 2016.
Please Donate Below To Support Our Ongoing Work To Expose The Lies About Covid 19
PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL, legally registered in the UK as a company 
incorporated for charitable purposes. Head Office: 27 Old Gloucester Street, London WC1N 3AX.
Trackback from your site.
VOWG
| #
They will have struggle against the BIG LIE.
Reply
Frank S.
| #
The FDA does not set policy, they merely present “recommendations”, which policymakers can either accept, modify or reject per their prerogative. If the FDA chose to withhold data, they did so because it wasn’t germane to their recommendations.
Given that the ‘rigid’ criteria necessary for inclusion in the VAERS report is so cumbersome, a Harvard study found fewer than 1 in 100 actual casas will ever bother to report to VAERS. This obstacle only serves to greatly skew the scope of data input, while their ‘vetting’ system only allows a tiny percentage of actual data output to the public.
Reply