FDA Just Called Out Fauci’s CDC For Massive Vax Coverup
The CDC has withheld substantial portions of data regarding the impact of COVID-19, causing anger among scientists and speculation that the agency is protecting its boosting case in specific demographics by not releasing the data.
A CDC study published two weeks ago examined the effectiveness of boosters in adults under 65 years of age.
A vaccination booster is considered least likely to benefit those aged 18-49, so the agency, led by Dr. Rochelle Walensky, didn’t share information on them.
Additionally, scientists complained they had not been able to obtain the information they held about the hospitalization of children.
According to CDC spokeswoman Kristen Nordlund, the agency was slow to release the different streams of data because they are not yet ready for implementation.
According to her, the agency’s ‘priority when gathering any data is to ensure that it’s accurate and actionable,’ and expressed concern that it might be misinterpreted as meaning vaccines were ineffective.
In addition, she said the CDC resisted publishing the data because it accounted for only 10 percent of the United States’ population – 33 million people – the same sample size it has used for years to track influenza in the United States.
Considering the low death rate among this age group, the booster is less likely to benefit the 18-49 age group. Older people and immunocompromised people are more likely to get sick without boosters than young and middle-aged healthy people.
Only last month, boosters for children aged 12 and up became available, thus not covered by the dataset.
The current vaccination rate among Americans is 65 percent.
An average of 103,150 new cases were reported nationwide every week, compared with more than 700,000 daily in January.
The outraged scientists stressed the importance of educating the public about vaccinations in conjunction with publishing the data. They explained that as more people get vaccinated, the percentage of vaccinated people getting infected or receiving hospitalization would also rise.
In their letter, they urged the CDC to publish the information.
‘Tell the truth, present the data,’ says Dr. Paul Offit, a vaccine expert as well as an adviser to the Food and Drug Administration.
‘I have to believe that there is a way to explain these things so people can understand it.’
In the absence of CDC publications, American researchers were forced to rely on Israeli data.
‘There’s no reason that they should be better at collecting and putting forth data than we were,’ he added.
‘The CDC is the principal epidemiological agency in this country, and so you would like to think the data came from them.’
Another said she was shocked the CDC had the data at all.
‘We have been begging for that sort of granularity of data for two years,’ Jessica Malaty Rivera, an epidemiologist, added. During the pandemic, she worked on the Covid Tracking Project, which provided data about the pandemic on a website until March 2021.
She denies that the data can be misinterpreted and says that instead, it ‘builds public trust, and it paints a much clearer picture of what’s actually going on.’
She continued: ‘It gets really exhausting when you see the private sector working faster than the premier public health agency of the world.’
As chair of the American Academy of Pediatrics’ Committee on Infectious Diseases, Dr. Yvonne Maldonado said she had requested from the CDC statistics about how many children hospitalized for COVID have other medical conditions.
Eventually, she was able to find what she needed thanks to a report in the New York Times.
‘They’ve known this for over a year and a half, right, and they haven’t told us,’ she said. ‘I mean, you can’t find out anything from them.’
Computer systems at the CDC are outdated, which is part of the problem.
Recent funding of $1 billion will allow the agency to upgrade its technology and process data faster.
An early benefit of this research will be an analysis of wastewater, which can tell scientists when an outbreak of COVID has occurred before tests confirm it.
Delta variants were identified in wastewater long before individuals were tested.
31 states’ data are currently available on the dashboard, with the CDC aiming to upload the rest later this year.
It’s not the first time the CDC has misled the public. There was an Arizona study that drew criticism from physicians.
According to this study, a “covid outbreak” is defined as “two or more” positive lab tests among students and staff. So if you have two asymptomatic 4th graders in your classroom, you have a “covid outbreak.”
In addition, researchers weighted an “outbreak” as equally as dozens of symptomatic teachers and students. Two equals 50, at least according to the CDC.
CDC minimized the fact that the unmasked and masked student groups did not differ significantly in a study in Georgia that had a sufficient control arm. They have also downplayed the importance of diet and exercise during this time of crisis.
Despite knowing life-saving outpatient treatment protocols, they failed to communicate them effectively.
See more here: republicbrief.com
Bold emphasis added
Header image: Reuters
Please Donate Below To Support Our Ongoing Work To Expose The Lies About COVID19
PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL, legally registered in the UK as a company 
incorporated for charitable purposes. Head Office: 27 Old Gloucester Street, London WC1N 3AX.
Trackback from your site.
very old white guy
| #
considering that none of the vaxxes work why are they still pushing that lie?
Reply
Tom
| #
From one crook to another…it’s a battle for the Joker of the Year award between the CDC and FDA.
Reply
Bill Howell
| #
Tom – funny! I’ve actually long appreciated CDC data and information retrieval systems. Unfortunately, they may be “poisoned by the politically-correct new legions”, like the rest of society. I despair that few will ever understand the old adage “The road to hell is paved with good intentions.” I gave up in Canada some years back, and should perhaps check if we’ve progressed here, but I have zero faith in our [scientist, health, policy, media] experts. It’s amazing how many people refuse to watch our garbage news media now – thank goodness for John O’Sullivan &colleagues’ PSI newsletter and the like. (Actually, John O’Sullivan’s name isn’t in the emails any longer. I just realised this, probably years later).
Reply
STEVYN R DEMBO
| #
They know that the virus is in waste water … therefore the virus is in farts. Yes there is n-one telling people to wear ass-masks. Pants/underwear don’t count because the CDC said cloth masks are useless. Occam’s razor says the whole thing is a scam.
Reply
Michael Castleblack
| #
“Computer systems at the CDC are outdated, …..”
Always an excuse from the bureaucrats! Blame the computers! Anything over 6 months old is outdated these days! The laptop I am using now is 6 yrs old with an Intel i5nprocessor but it still works great and does what it has done since the start. What!, the CDC is running on Apple IIe computers?
Reply
Mervyn Sullivan
| #
The corruption at the NIH, the CDC and the FDA, as well as in ‘Big Pharma’, has resulted in peoples’ loss of confidence in these incestuous organisations. There are so many conflicts of interest between these organisations, they should all be prosecuted under the RICO Act.
These criminals are not interested in health care. They are into the money making rackety of ‘sick care’ where their expensive drugs make people sick just so that their even more expensive drugs are then required for treatment. And that’s what we are seeing with their covid injections that don’t prevent covid.
Reply