Expanding France’s Power Grid With More Wind And Solar Poses ‘Serious Risk’
The French are finding out that combining nuclear power with unstable wind and sun is not a good idea and is a risk to the power grid. Spain recently had to learn a similar lesson, and most painfully. [emphasis, links added]
In a recent EDF report on nuclear safety, Rapport de l’Inspecteur Général pour la Sûreté Nucléaire et la Radioprotection, lead author and former admiral Jean Casabianca concluded that further expansion of wind and solar energy in France poses a serious risk to the country’s power grid.
According to the report, the instability of a weather-dependent wind and solar power supply is a technical and financial burden to nuclear power in France.
Page 13 of the report states:
The massive arrival of new renewable electricity sources (RE), both intermittent and a priority on the grid, has multiplied load variations.
They are not without risk to the safety of the power system (including blackouts), nor are they without constraints on the operation of our facilities. In the long term, they call into question our economic model. (…)
Modulation has gone from flexibility to constraint, with nuclear power having to meet demand alone or in conjunction with hydropower, unless we resort to using thermal and carbon-intensive means.
In addition, load following inevitably has an impact on the machine, which is more frequently solicited by deep cycling. The increase in fortuitous events is not obvious, but it’s over time that the effects will be appreciated.
I believe that the priority given to renewable energies, in a unilateral nuclear-Renewable Energies scheme, leads to power variations which it would be all the more opportune to dispense with, as they are never insignificant in terms of safety, particularly reactivity control, and the maintainability, longevity and operating costs of our facilities.”
Many previously claimed that the nuclear industry could be harmoniously paired with wind energy and thus lead to a decarbonized French electricity mix.
But that is proving to be more fantasy than reality.
The recent Spanish blackout was a glaring example of what can happen when ideology clashes with hard science and reality.
Many engineers and specialists had warned of the risks and complications involved with nuclear power plants having to adapt their output to uncontrolled, fluctuating energies like wind and sun.
The AASSDN site here summarizes:
In the global energy war being waged in France by this pro-wind and pro-photovoltaic lobbying that is contrary to France’s energy interests, this discreet report strikes a real blow to France’s intermittent energy policy.
Even if energy and political players haven’t yet fully grasped the significance of this historic technical report, there’s no denying that it will be a landmark and cannot be buried or downplayed by EDF CEO Luc Rémont.”
See more here Climate Dispatch
Please Donate Below To Support Our Ongoing Work To Defend The Scientific Method
PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL, legally registered in the UK as a company incorporated for charitable purposes. Head Office: 27 Old Gloucester Street, London WC1N 3AX.
Trackback from your site.
Physics Scientist
| #
Energy production should be entirely funded and operated by the private sector, without reliance on government subsidies. Such financial support is unnecessary, as carbon dioxide—according to established physics—does not have the capacity to warm the Earth. This concept is explored in detail in the following article:
https://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2025/05/cosmic_rays_not_carbon_dioxide_cause_climate_change.html
Reply
Jerry Krause
| #
Hi PSI Readers,
RAWS (Remote Automated Weather Stations) is a USA project with more than a 1000 sites scattered on US sites where wildfires are possible. I call this link (https://raws.dri.edu/cgi-bin/rawMAIN.pl?orOALL) to your attention because previously for several weeks there has been anomalous temperature measurements.
To understand (see) what this anomalous data is one must go the link scan back a few days studying the atmospheric temperatures, the fuel temperatures, and the solar radiations. First, the atmospheric temperature is being measured about five feet above the ground surface and the fuel temperature one foot above the ground. Because the ground is a better radiator than the atmosphere the ground surface cools faster during the night as you can see occurred last night. But if you scan backwards to the previous nights you can see the fuel temperature remains well above the atmosphere as does during the midday.
If you study the incident solar you can see there is some uniform cloud during the daytime day after day as you scan backwards until you get back to normal in tense solar again. Try to explain what is causing what we see.
Have a good day
Reply