Existing US Guardrails Cannot Stop EVs Smashing Through Them
A new car safety study has proven that electric vehicles (EVs) are too heavy to be restrained by US guardrails that line roads in case of accidents, researchers at the University of Nebraska-Lincoln said
As the number of EVs such as Teslas and Chevrolet Bolts takes over the roads amid concerns over the environmental impact of gasoline-powered vehicles, one of the lead researchers from the university’s Midwest Roadside Safety Facility (MwRSF) warned that there needs to be “some urgency to address this issue.”
In a study sponsored by the U.S. Army Engineer Research and Development Center (ERDC) and partnered with Auburn University’s Transportation Research Institute, MwRSF conducted a “first-of-its-kind crash test” of an EV pickup truck in October 2023.
The test used a 7,148-pound 2022 Rivian R1T truck that was sent at a barrier at a speed of 60 mph, with footage showing the heavy EV completely blasting through the guardrail and launching over the concrete wall while sending chunks of it flying:
The R1T’s immense weight is largely due to its 135-kWh battery pack, which brings the vehicle’s weight to a “ton more than a Ford F-150 SuperCab,” car review site Edmunds states.
“There is some urgency to address this issue,” MwRSF assistant director Cody Stolle told the university’s news publication in January. “As the percentage of EVs on the road increases, the proportion of run-off-road crashes involving EVs will increase as well.”
Even though the impact with the concrete brought the pickup truck to a halt, “several of the 5,000-pound barriers were pushed back 10 feet — 50 percent more than normal,” CBS News reported of the test on Thursday.
The researchers stated that safety barriers and guardrails are typically tested using vehicles weighing between 2,400-5,000 pounds — significantly lighter than EVs, “which typically weigh 20 percent to 50 percent more than gas-powered vehicles.”
“MwRSF research suggests that EVs are involved in run-off-road crashes at about the same rate and about the same speeds as gasoline vehicles,” the university said.
“That would mean an EV crashing into a roadside barrier could have 20 percent to 50 percent more impact energy.”
“It is going to be necessary to reexamine the designs of roadside barriers even beyond the EVs,” said Stolle. “It’s a critical and timely need.”
Another test, conducted on a 2018 Tesla Model 3 in September 2023, resulted in the sedan’s structure being able to lift the guardrail and pass underneath it before stopping behind the barrier.
See more here climatechangedispatch
Header image: University of Nebraska-Lincoln
Please Donate Below To Support Our Ongoing Work To Defend The Scientific Method
PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL, legally registered in the UK as a company 
incorporated for charitable purposes. Head Office: 27 Old Gloucester Street, London WC1N 3AX.
Trackback from your site.
Howdy
| #
A repeat of https://principia-scientific.com/heavy-hitters-evs-smash-through-guardrails-raising-new-safety-concerns/
Reply
D. Boss
| #
not only a repeat article, but it’s debunking is hereby undertaken again:
It is a bullsh*t premise, because there are plenty of internal combustion engined trucks routinely sold and driven by people in N America which weigh as much as or more than this EV truck. Examples are dual wheel F350 which weighs from 8,000 to 13,000 lbs. Also the Chevy and Dodge versions, of which Ford sold 60,000 F series trucks in 2023, of which at least 20% were of this larger, heavier variety.
And then there are vans, cube vans, straight trucks, and semi trucks, not to mention cement trucks and dump trucks – where weights range from 10,000 t0 80,000 lbs. Accidents and guard rail destruction happens when these heavier internal combustion vehicles impact them. So the “concern” about heavy EV’s is idiotic, misguided and a non issue.
That said, EV’s are stupid, wasteful and do not reduce the need for fossil fuels (you still need reliable power generation, and no EV can do the mining, transport and refining of the raw materials needed to build an EV)
Reply
Howdy
| #
This is what I consider the ultimate in ridiculous EV design:
https://www.mammoet.com/news/first-hydraulic-electric-crane-joins-mammoet-fleet2/
It can run about the place on it’s own, but lifting operations require it to be plugged in.
How much steel, and copper does it consume?
“The crane can be plugged into a 32A-rated, 63A-rated or 125A-rated supply on site”
That suggests limitation based on the power source. Perhaps the on-site power provision would be a diesel generator rather than tapping into the mains.
Or this:
https://www.liebherr.com/en/gbr/products/mobile-and-crawler-cranes/crawler-cranes/lr-crawler-cranes/details/lr1200unplugged.html?srsltid=AfmBOor9XhRQVXiM9fYgVvHKXL_jWK0HSkOLL-dCnpvp-7sUmkDiN-ob
Lifts 220 tons, but the site says battery lasts only for 4 hours of lifting operation, but no weight figures for that time period, so could be much lower.
Ludicrous.
Reply