Ex Minnesota State Legislator: ‘We’ve all been played’
Increasingly, there are serious questions being asked about the factual basis for declaring a pandemic and the growing number of mitigation policies being implemented by governments and corporations. When is a COVID-19 case really a “case”?
Do the case numbers and death numbers that have been touted over the last 12 months by governments in UK, EU, USA, and numerous governments around the world, accurately reflect actual COVID cases and COVID deaths?
In fact, the World Health Organization (WHO) itself has admitted that the entire basis for collating “case” numbers since the beginning of this ‘global pandemic’ is effectively null and void. In its directive published in late January, the organization stated that medical professionals should not be using PCR Testing with high Cycle Threshold (CT) levels due to the high likelihood of generating false positives in people, and also that the PCR Test should not be used as the sole metric for diagnosing and should be accompanied by a professional clinical diagnosis.
In other words: the PCR Test cannot rightly be used as a medical diagnostic tool, and yet, it has been widely used as such for the last 12 months. This admission should have grave implications for every public health official, politician and media editor on the planet – but we hear almost nothing as most are simply ignoring this fact.
The following directive was issued on January 20, 2021 by the WHO:
Description of the problem: WHO requests users to follow the instructions for use (IFU) when interpreting results for specimens tested using PCR methodology.
Users of IVDs must read and follow the IFU carefully to determine if manual adjustment of the PCR positivity threshold is recommended by the manufacturer.
WHO guidance Diagnostic testing for SARS-CoV-2 states that careful interpretation of weak positive results is needed (1). The cycle threshold (Ct) needed to detect virus is inversely proportional to the patient’s viral load. Where test results do not correspond with the clinical presentation, a new specimen should be taken and retested using the same or different NAT technology.
WHO reminds IVD users that disease prevalence alters the predictive value of test results; as disease prevalence decreases, the risk of false positive increases (2). This means that the probability that a person who has a positive result (SARS-CoV-2 detected) is truly infected with SARS-CoV-2 decreases as prevalence decreases, irrespective of the claimed specificity.
Most PCR assays are indicated as an aid for diagnosis, therefore, health care providers must consider any result in combination with timing of sampling, specimen type, assay specifics, clinical observations, patient history, confirmed status of any contacts, and epidemiological information.
See more here: beforeitsnews.com
Please Donate Below To Support Our Ongoing Work To Expose The Lies About COVID19
PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL, legally registered in the UK as a company 
incorporated for charitable purposes. Head Office: 27 Old Gloucester Street, London WC1N 3AX.
Trackback from your site.
richard
| #
“Profiteers of fear” by the respected Documentary Channel , Arte, foretold the tricks organisations would play in pushing a fake pandemic on the world. Changing the definition of pandemic from deaths to cases made the job easier for them as now you could fake a pandemic using the PCR test to get the numbers.
Reply
Chris
| #
I believe that people such as the who or the cdc came and said not to use the pcr in order to establish their defense for the eventual court cases. The lawyers will need to focus on the fact that they said that but then contradicted themselves by using the pcr tests. The simple fact is that they were able to create the appearance of a pandemic by changing the definition of a pandemic and using false positives from pcr tests to present a spread of disease appearance. At no time did they find the dreaded covid19 virus so they cannot provide any physical evidence of its existence.
China is prepping their defense by having that man say to CBS, I think it was, that no one in the world has been able to isolate the virus. This will result in them winning their case simply because the rest of the world participated in creating the pandemic hoax while knowing that there was no physical evidence of its existence.
Reply
NecktopPC
| #
Re: “Do the case numbers and death numbers that have been touted over the last 12 months by governments in UK, EU, USA, and numerous governments around the world, accurately reflect actual COVID cases and COVID deaths?”
Not from “CANADA” either.
Released: 2021-03-10
The direct impacts of COVID-19 cannot fully account for the excess deaths observed in Canada in 2020, particularly in the fall.
In the early months of the pandemic, the weekly number of excess deaths and deaths caused by COVID-19 were closely aligned and mostly affected older populations, suggesting that COVID-19 itself was driving excess mortality in Canada. However, more recently, the number of excess deaths has been higher than the number of deaths due to COVID-19, and these deaths are affecting younger populations, suggesting that other factors, including possible indirect impacts of the pandemic, are now at play.
https://www150.statcan.gc.ca/n1/daily-quotidien/210310/dq210310c-eng.htm
Reply
denis dombas
| #
Since there are no autopsies done on so called “covid 19” deaths the numbers are scewed
in order to justify governments measures .Here in British Columbia even if we take those numbers at face value of 1394 dead in population of 5.5 million it comes only to 1/3rd of
1 tenth of 1 %,which shows there is no “pandemic” but fraud.The average age of dead at 85 years of age, life expectancy at 83.5 years
Reply