Ever-Rising ‘Green’ Energy Costs Have World Leaders In Turmoil
World leaders are in turmoil. For 30 years, the UN, the World Economic Forum, and the International Energy Agency, among business and political leaders called for a shift from hydrocarbon fuels to ‘renewable’ energy
Thousands of laws were enacted to try to force an energy transition.
But it’s now clear that ‘green’ energy is unable to meet the needs of growing developing nations or support the artificial intelligence (AI) revolution in advanced nations.
Since the founding of the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) in 1992, the UN has led efforts to reduce carbon dioxide emissions to try to ‘fight’ human-caused global warming.
Delegates from more than 180 nations meet at the annual UN Conference of the Parties (COP) to discuss ‘climate action’, with recent COP attendance exceeding 50,000 attendees.
But there is no evidence that UN COP meetings and more than $10 trillion spent on ‘renewables’ over the last 30 years have had any effect on the climate.
The average atmospheric carbon dioxide concentration, which is blamed for global warming, has been rising over the last 50 years without any change to the trend.
The World Economic Forum, established in 1971, states:
“business should not only create economic value but also serve society and the planet.”
At the WEF Sustainable Development Impact Summit in 2020, more than 4,500 leaders called for a “Great Reset for Sustainable Development”, committing to reach ‘net zero’ by 2050 or sooner.
Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) policy was established in 2004 by the UN as a framework to evaluate a company beyond traditional financial metrics. Of high importance in ESG is a firm’s efforts to reduce ‘greenhouse gas’ emissions and support policies to fight ‘climate change’.
But ‘net zero’ policies cannot support the energy needs of growing developing nations.
Also, the rise of artificial intelligence drives a huge need for electrical power in advanced nations that cannot be supplied by intermittent energy sources. Businesses and political leaders now realize that ‘net zero’ and ESG are not the keys to the future.
Today, more than 6,500 coal-fired power plants operate with more than 1,000 new plants in planning or under construction.
Coal plants provided 34 percent of world electricity in 2024, the leading source.
Leaders call for an end to coal-fired power, but coal consumption grew to an all-time high in 2024. Still, 700 million people still do not have access to electricity and about two billion suffer blackouts or brownouts every other day.
In 2021, Fatih Birol, Executive Director of the International Energy Agency, said:
”If governments are serious about the climate crisis, there can be no new investments in oil, gas, and coal from now—from this year.”
But last year the IEA World Energy Outlook predicted that oil demand would continue to increase to 2050 and that gas consumption would increase 30 percent by 2050 in their “current policies scenario.”
U.S. Energy Secretary Chris Wright recently pointed out that each of the billion people in the developed world uses about 13 barrels of oil per year, while a developing nation resident uses only about three barrels per year.
The US and Europe have one or two vehicles per person compared to less than one vehicle for every ten people in Africa or India. Residents of wealthy nations use ten times the plastic used by people in developing countries.
Developing countries will propel the demand for hydrocarbon fuels to better their standards of living. ‘Net zero’ policies would reverse that into a big drop in living standards.
The AI revolution now drives the need for electric power in wealthy nations. The US and China are competing for AI dominance and Europe wants to join the battle. Data center construction is skyrocketing to support AI. Amazon, Google, Meta and Microsoft invested over $380 billion last year on AI infrastructure, a total larger than the gross domestic product of more than 140 nations.
Larry Fink, co-chair of the WEC and CEO of BlackRock, the world’s largest investment fund, said at the WEC conference last month:
“You cannot rely solely on intermittent sources like wind and solar. You need dispatchable power because these data centers cannot simply turn on and off.”
AI data centers are being powered by natural gas and in some cases nuclear power.
Leading firms pledged to become ‘net zero’, but the AI revolution is shattering those plans. In 2020, Google announced a goal to operate on ‘carbon’-free energy by 2030. But in 2024 Google admitted their emissions rose 48 percent over the last four years due to AI-driven services.
In 2020, petroleum company BP launched a $200 million “environmentally friendly” public relations campaign. The firm rebranded itself as “Beyond Petroleum,” pledging to reduce oil and gas production 40 percent by 2030 and to boost investments in ‘renewable’ energy.
Shell, ExxonMobil, and Chevron all announced plans to invest in ‘renewables’ or ‘green’ technologies such as ‘carbon’ capture and storage. This would eventually put them all out of business of course.
But oil and gas firms found that ‘renewables’ couldn’t make money, even with government subsidies. Returns on renewable projects were about six percent while oil and gas project returns were over ten percent.
BP and Shell scaled back their ‘renewable’ goals and investments in 2025.
In 2020, Larry Fink declared that he intended to use the trillions of US dollars managed by BlackRock to ‘address’ global warming. Almost every major financial institution pledged to reduce emissions.
ESG became a defining feature of Wall Street investing. More than 100 companies joined Climate Action 100+ to focus on reducing emissions globally. The UN-convened Net Zero Banking Alliance was established in 2021 and quickly grew to 140 financial institutions.
Then Came The Great Reversal
But a conservative backlash attacked financial industry support for ESG and climate action. Republican legislatures in the US introduced more than 100 bills to penalize financial companies that supported ESG practices.
Republican state treasurers withdrew money from BlackRock. As a result, climate and ESG efforts in the financial industry have collapsed.
After Donald Trump’s re-election in November 2024, almost every US financial institution pulled out of the Net Zero Banking Alliance, causing the group to fold. Dozens of firms left Climate Action 100+.
European firms also pulled back from climate commitments.
The shutdown of US climate policies during President Trump’s second term have devastated the global climate movement. The US has withdrawn from the Paris Climate Agreement and the UNFCCC and cut funding for 18 alarmist climate organizations.
A climate tax on shipping proposed by the International Maritime Organization was halted by US and China opposition.
The ending of US subsidies for wind, solar, and electric vehicles heavily impacted those industries.
Microsoft founder and climate activist Bill Gates authored the book How to Avoid a Climate Disaster in 2021. But last fall he changed his position.
In a memo to COP30, he criticized the climate community for their “doomsday outlook” and focusing too much on “near-term emissions goals,” stating that “our chief goal should be to prevent suffering, particularly for those in the toughest conditions who live in the world’s poorest countries.”
In addition to US Republican opposition, other political parties withdrew support from ‘net zero’. Reform UK, which is leading in UK polls, coined the phrase “Net Stupid Zero.”
Alternative für Deutschland, the number two political party in Germany, calls wind turbines “windmills of shame”. Both the National and the Liberal parties in Australia scrapped their support for ‘net zero’ last fall, concerned with ‘green’ energy costs.
Conclusion
World leaders are pulling back from climate hysteria and demands for increasingly expensive ‘cheap’ ‘renewable’ energy. It’s time to return to sensible energy policy and embrace a very slightly warmer world, as humanity has done for all of history.
See more here masterresource.org
Bold emphasis added
About the author: Steve Goreham is a speaker on energy, the environment, and public policy, and author of four books, including Green Breakdown: The Coming Renewable Energy Failure.
Tom
| #
Having idiots in charge often results in unintended consequences.
Reply