‘Error-filled’ Greenhouse Gas Theory Exposed: No CO2 Climate Warming
Latest independent research shows no measurable atmospheric carbon dioxide greenhouse effect, affirming findings in the groundbreaking 2010 book, Slaying the Sky Dragon: Death of the Greenhouse Gas Theory. Therefore, CO2 is proven innocent of any added global warming.
The new work of Markus Ott, a chemist with a PhD, an independent investigator of the famed CO2 climate control knob hypothesis affirms the damning assessment of a myriad of other applied scientists linked with Principia Scientific International.
In the last decade more scientists have come forward to admit that climate computer models are fatally flawed because university academics have overlooked to check their wild alarmist predictions with indepedent industry experts who have the ‘hands on’ knowledge of the real world properties of CO2. The ‘real’ scientists are saying that the academics have been bamboozled by GIGO.
Dr Ott explains in his attached video presentation Markus Ott: Convection and Thermalisation Kill The Greenhouse Effect:
In my last video I explained the saturation effect for light absorptions in this context I mentioned Heinz Hugs who measured the extinction coefficient of CO2 in air. Based on these measurements he concluded that due to the saturation of the 15 micrometer CO2 absorption the further increase of the atmospheric CO2 concentration will have practically no influence on the Earth’s surface temperature.
According to his results only about 0.17 percent of the CO2 absorption are not yet saturated at an atmospheric CO2 concentration of about 400 ppmv.
In view of these facts even true believers in the greenhouse effect should abandon the CO2 caused climate change theory when we assume there is a greenhouse effect that somehow causes a total “back radiation” of 324 watt per square meter and that CO2 makes for about 32 watt per square meter of that total. Then the CO2 “back radiation” can increase by not more than approximately 0.05 watt per square meter before total saturation of this absorption is reached no matter how high the atmospheric CO2 concentration goes.
These additional 0.05 watt per square meter cannot cause more than 0.01 degrees Centigrade of additional surface warming. This is the absolute limit for the CO2 warming effect no matter how high the CO2 concentration rises.
Having watched the above video, it is reasurring to be able to affirm that the ‘Slayers’ have yet again been vindicated in their work, despite widespread ridicule from the groupthinkers in alarmist academia.
Alarmists and ‘lukewarmers‘ have for too long had their eyes transfixed by their computer screens and toy models zealously stuck in a fantasy matrix world of dogmatic claim that carbon dioxide ‘must cause warming‘ – but there exists no known application in industry or applied science that utilizes CO2 for anything other than cooling.
Carbon dioxide has been used successfully for over a century in refrigeration and air conditioning because it emits received energy within 3 nanoseconds – a characteristic that defies all ‘heat trapping’ pseudoscience claims.
Applied science, which tempers over enthusiasm with the cold hard certainties of lab testing and ‘hands on’ proofs reveals there is a mismatch of the thought patterns (group think) within academia that has befuddled itself in an uncompomising and misguided reliance on computer GIGO (‘garbage in, garbage out’).
University professors with no real world applied science knowledge or experience have repeatedly been found wanting and there is an increasing divide among them and the broader community of applied scientists who dissent from that greenhouse effect fantasy.
For those not familiar with the terms:
Applied science is the use of the scientific method and knowledge obtained via conclusions from the method to attain practical goals. It includes a broad range of disciplines such as engineering and medicine. It should be confused with consensus science – which, in the context of government-funded universities and institutions – whereby the paymasters in the system get to dictate the norms and boundaries of scientific discourse.
Data Scientist vs. Research Scientist vs. Applied Scientist
We urge the non-science community to become better acquainted with these sometimes opposing concepts because insight into why so many ‘experts’ can be so inexplicably mistaken becomes explicable when we recognise science today is overly specialised, compartmentalized and susceptible to systemic error.
About Markus Ott. Dr Ott is a chemist with a PhD, has been working as a researcher and developer in the chemical and pharmaceutical industry since 1994. He has mainly worked on the development of photolithographic methods for the production of biochips and on the development of light-curing plastics. In addition to the theoretical basics, he has the necessary practical experience to assess the interaction of light with matter. As an enthusiastic aviator, he is deeply interested in the processes in the atmosphere since his youth. The present text “Dismantling The CO2-Hoax” or the German version “Demomtage des CO2-Betruges” were written from the practitioner ́s perspective who has to deliver reliable products and cannot hide behind computer models. “Dismantling The CO2-Hoax”: https://tomn.substack.com/p/dismantli…
“Must see” Murry Salby video from March 2015: 
• ProfSalby London 2015 720p
About John O’Sullivan: : John is CEO and co-founder (with Dr Tim Ball) of Principia Scientific International (PSI). John co-hosts TNT Radio’s Sky Dragon Slaying show with fellow PSI co-founders, Joe Olson and Joe Postma. He is a seasoned science writer and adept legal analyst who assisted Dr Ball in defeating world leading climate expert, Michael ‘hockey stick’ Mann in the multi-million-dollar ‘science trial of the century‘. O’Sullivan is credited as the visionary who formed the original ‘Slayers’ group of scientists in 2010 who then collaborated in creating the world’s first full-volume ‘Slaying the Sky Dragon: Death of the Greenhouse Gas Theory’ debunking alarmist lies about carbon dioxide plus their follow-up climate book. His latest publication, ‘Slaying the Virus and Vaccine Dragon’ exposes dangerous mainstream medical group think and junk science.
Please Donate Below To Support Our Ongoing Work To Defend The Scientific Method
PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL, legally registered in the UK as a company 
incorporated for charitable purposes. Head Office: 27 Old Gloucester Street, London WC1N 3AX.
Trackback from your site.
Jerry Krause
| #
Hi John and Markus Ott and PSI Readers
I have recently directed to the following link (https://gml.noaa.gov/grad/surfrad/dataplot.html)
To date there is no evidence that you two or anyone else has LISTENED.
Have a good day
Reply
K. Kaiser
| #
Hello Jerry,
What, exactly, should one be listening TO ?
Pl. be more specific and,
is NOAA your only source?
KK
Reply
Jerry Krause
| #
Hi KK,
You asked: “What, exactly, should one be listening TO ?” Galileo Galilei.
His book begins, as translated to English by Henry Crew and Alfonso de Salvio: “The constant activity you Venetians display in your famous arsenal suggrsts to the studious mind a large field for investigation, especially that part of the work which involves mechanics; for in this department all types of instruments and machines are constantly being constructed by many artisans, … “ The thermometer and the barometer had not been constructed before Galileo wrote this. I called attention to measurements being measured by instruments which have been since constructed by modern artisans. And if no one pays any attention to these measurements, the artisans have wasted their efforts and time.
Have a good day
Reply
Lorraine
| #
Just a word of caution, scientists are as easily bought as politicians.
When reading and interpreting scientific information presented as “data” take a large grain of salt to offset the potential bias of funding of the scientists and the study itself. It is to everyone’s advantage to be a skeptic.
My personal bias is, there is no such thing as man made climate change. I refer you to the Eemian record.
Reply
James
| #
It’s well known that the last ice-age started it’s end about 14ky ago, and that since then there was no CO2 increase. Do we know why? But the earth warmed, seas increased level by about a hundred meters and civilisation human civilisations throve on the agriculture that abundant fresh water allowed. Then CO2 started to increase only when industry appeared, so came after the warming, and cannot be its cause. Now we await the next glaciation. if it comes soon, we’ll be in trouble, gas or not.
Reply