Doctors Who Discovered Cancer Enzymes in Vaccines all Murdered!
Not long ago, Neon Nettle reported on the epidemic of doctors being murdered, most of which were in Florida, U.S. The scientists all shared a common trait, they had all discovered that nagalase enzyme protein was being added to vaccines which were then administrated to humans. SEE VIDEO BELOW.
Nagalese is what prevents vitamin D from being produced in the body, which is the body’s main defence to naturally kill cancer cells.
According to Thebigriddle.com: Nagalase is a protein that’s also created by all cancer cells. This protein is also found in very high concentrations in autistic children. It is deliberately being added to our vaccines!
This prevents the body from utilizing the Vitamin D necessary to fight cancer and prevent autism. Nagalese disables the immune system. It’s also known to cause Type 2 Diabetes.
So basically…they weren’t killing these doctors because they had found the cure to cancer or were successfully treating autism… they’re killing them because these Dr’s had been researching and had the evidence that the vaccines they’re injecting our precious children with are CAUSING our current cancer and autism crisis.
And that it’s obviously being done knowingly and on purpose! The Dr’s they killed in FL had been collaborating and were getting ready to go public with the information.
Depopulation 101..add poison to vaccines…make it law that all children must be injected to attend school. Slow kill methods. They think they’re being fair w/ their “survival of the fittest” type mentality. Only the best genes survive? These people have no souls.
Dr Ted Broer broke it on The Hagmann & Hagmann Report and it took them a whole hour just to get him on air b/c their 3 hour show was brought down and every line they tried to use kept disconnecting…and then their servers were brought down.
They asked a bunch of people to pray against the attack and then finally got him on a secured line and so a full hour into the show they were finally back on the air and connected to Dr Broer and the first thing he said was “I am in no way suicidal.” He was super nervous holding onto this info…afraid he’d be taken out Hastings style before he got a chance to say it publicly. So listen to this short clip of him breaking the story.
It’s a 19 min clip but the most important info is heard within the first 10 min. It is def some of the most important news I’ve ever heard. And it needs to go viral.
https://youtu.be/XYvLPCze_So
Read more at freedomoutpost.com
PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL, legally registered in the UK as a company incorporated for charitable purposes. Head Office: 27 Old Gloucester Street, London WC1N 3AX. Telephone: Calls from within the UK: 020 7419 5027. International dialling: (44) 20 7419 5027.
Please DONATE TODAY
Help Our Non-Profit Mission To Defend The Scientific Method.
Trackback from your site.
Mark Eickhoff
| #
This is probably the worse article I have ever seen on this site. As a result of this conspiracy BS, we now have a mumps epidemic on our college campuses and previous healthy kids could be injured for life due to the complications. Vaccine makers DO NOT add this to their vaccines. The is beyond ridiculous conspiracy claim. You should take this article down immediately.
Reply
John O'Sullivan
| #
Mark, No one here at PSI is claiming ALL vaccines are unsafe. But how can anyone forget the appalling Thalidomide scandal?
There are always two sides to every story and we will continue to run stories addressing potential malfeasance among govt/corporate entities – despite glib retorts about “conspiracy BS.”
Are you seriously suggesting you know the deaths of these doctors is unconnected, just nothingburger fake news clickbait? Moreover, how can you possibly know what is added to certain suspected vaccines if all the data isn’t placed in the public record? What concerns many of our members is that evidence is being suppressed, adulterated and scientists/doctors vilified and/or killed in highly suspicious circumstances. We have seen a top level conspiracy for 30 years in the global warming scam – it appears it is happening in medicine too.
Reply
Kourt Clarke
| #
When was Thalidomide used as a vaccine?
Reply
John O'Sullivan
| #
Kourt, fair point, not a vaccine per se. But the example proves the danger inherent in trusting Big Pharma. Globally Thalidomide was one of the most successful prescription drugs. a widely prescribed sedative given to pregnant mothers and claimed to be safe by the medical establishment. By the time the drug was banned, at least 10,000 children are known to have been born with major thalidomide-related problems – many with severe limb deformities.
Then as now, the law is gamed in favor of Big Pharma. Shockingly, because the required animal safety-tests did not show evidence of any danger, the manufacturers of Thalidomide were found not guilty at trial of consciously marketing a harmful drug.
The evidence pointed to animal experiment results being manipulated, whether consciously or unconsciously, to produce results favorable to a financial backer. Secondly, problematic animal testing (rather than extensive tests on humans) serves as a legal alibi for corporations when their products kill and injure people. Nothing has changed.
Reply
Kourt Clarke
| #
So you just ‘accidentally’ misrepresented Thalidomide as a vaccine? Isn’t that a pretty disingenuous argument to promote anti-pharmaceutical hysteria? Lumping all pharmaceutical companies into one big evil corporation should mean that we should NOT trust anything coming out of the pharmacy business now? Or that medical science can and will continue make mistakes? Thalidomide was a case study for how the standard for marketing and testing were improved instead of just assuming that they are continuing to be ignored or mis-marketed based on actual testing.
Do you have actual evidence that the scientific requirements or legal standards which are being ignored or are you just peddling hysteria based on a past mistake which actually improved current standards and oversight for pharmaceutical companies? Your arguments themselves seem to ignore basic scientific methods and promote excessive standards in spite of changes and if I were to hold your mistake on the “Thalidomide vaccine” statement then maybe your arguments should just be ignored based on that one mistake correct? That should be fair in holding you to the same expectation for flawless science and medical standards, right?
Shouldn’t you be held to the same standard for misrepresenting your argument just as you hold ALL of pharmaceutical companies to the flawless standards? How do we know your arguments are not 100% accurate all of the time? Have you ever lied or misspoken or misrepresented and argument just as you did with the “Thalidomide vaccine”? Can’t have it both ways.
Mark Eickhoff
| #
I have several friends and colleagues who develop and make vaccines. What this article claims does NOT happen. If it did, there would be hundreds of whistleblowers, believe me. This is a garbage site and I will no longer follow it.
Reply
John O'Sullivan
| #
Kourt, You sound hysterical and seem incapable of discerning the nuances in my post. I am in favor of vaccines in principle – they have worked fine for me. But why can’t you accept there is a real problem with the overly-powerful Big Pharma in the US which has blanket immunity from being sued for damages caused by their vaccines? If their vaccines are so safe why worry about being sued?
Unlike you, I have been persuaded that an element of corruption and incompetence exists among these manufacturers – just as everywhere else. Big Pharma is in the business of growing customers, not in developing cures. If you are too stupid to wear a skeptical hat in this debate then more fool you!
Reply
Kourt Clarke
| #
I think calling out Big Pharm like it is Big Brother makes you the hysterical one. Are you arguing against vaccines or Big Pharma? They are not the same thing. If you have specific evidence of corruption or scientific malfeasance then provide it especially it is across the board and being run by your boogeyman whether it’s Big Pharm or the Illuminati or Colonel Sanders.
The numbers more than back up the effectiveness of vaccines in the hundreds of thousands to one. It’s just math. You can claim there is something nefarious but the fact that vaccines have and continue to work, on a global scale, more than compensates for the less than .00001% who MAY have a directly negative effect from them. If you think there is a problem then specifically state it instead of broad-brushing the ‘corporation is evil because it is big’ line and then back it up with numbers that challenge the overwhelming effectiveness of vaccines. Otherwise it is just conspiracy theory garbage and not worth this site’s claims toward science.
P.S. You replied to the wrong guy. You might want to verify who are blogging at next time even if it is only vomiting up anti-vaxxing conspiracy theories..
Paul Johnson
| #
Pure unadulterated horseshit. And to think I thought this was a serious scientific website
Reply
H.Keys
| #
After reading this article and checking its veracity on line, I’m feeling a little disappointed that donated money to PSI. I was hoping for a little more integrity.
Reply
Dwieland
| #
I’m thinking the same thing. In fact, thinking critically is what most of us here wish more people did about the climate “crisis”. Shouldn’t we be at least as skeptical of such a claim regarding vaccines, which have strong, clearly documented benefits. This article makes absurd, nonsensical claims and has no place in PSI. I’m very disappointed.
Reply
John O'Sullivan
| #
H. Keys, Do you have links to online evidence debunking the article? We would be very interested in verifying the evidence for and against the claims.
Reply
Al Shelton
| #
I read this… but cannot verify if Snopes is accurate..
https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/holistic-doctor-death-conspiracy/
Reply
fthoma
| #
Snopes is not accurate on anything. It is a BS water carrier for the libs. This site is coming off my bookmarks list.
Reply
Dwieland
| #
I’m thinking the same thing. In fact, thinking critically is what most of us here wish more people did about the climate “crisis”. Shouldn’t we be at least as skeptical of such a claim regarding vaccines, which have strong, clearly documented benefits. This article makes absurd, nonsensical claims and has no place in PSI. I’m very disappointed.
Reply
Ted
| #
In 45 years of busy country family practice I have had more than 600,000 consultations. Not 1 single case of Diptheria, not 1 case of acute Polio, or Tetanus, or Smallpox. In 1982 prior to Measles immunisation, my partner and I saw 300 cases of measles in a single 4 week period. Two died. Shortly thereafter universal immunisation commenced for Measles, I have not seen a single case in the last 15 years. On the farm next door to mine the farmer in the1880s had 8 children in February and Diptheria came to town. He was left with 1 child in April. The 7 tiny graves are lined up in the local church graveyard. Who on earth would want to prevent immunisation. Why would you want to give these people oxygen on this site? Let them go to other sites and pedal their wares. They don’t belong here.
Reply
Matt Holl
| #
The most common manifestations of the corruption of due process are games of power and control. People with big egos can still follow due process so power and control is not necessarily an issue of ego but unmandated impositions with a genesis derived from a variety of motives.
A relative contemporary addition to the lexicon is “noble cause corruption”. Police planting evidence because they “knew” the defendant was guilty, or environmentalists lying and manipulating to save the world; ad nauseam.
To counter corruption it is necessary for good people to do something (Edmund Burke) without fear or favor. These good people need a moral compass and a passing knowledge of governance and due process and an exact adherence to integrity and scrupulousness. By doing so they may be forgiven their errors and still contribute to exemplary outcomes or solutions.
For clarity of moral compass, reference to the old sayings, the old truths can be a useful companion. Lead by example; do unto others (the golden rule); if it is good for the goose it is good for the gander (a bygone test of equity) etcetera. A test I conceived is; “if something does not make sense, if one and one does not add up to two, it is either incompetence or corruption. If one and one repeatedly does not add up to two, it is always corruption”. Corruption means rotten.
An old truth, test, for this article is the saying, “choose your battles wisely”.
As a non scientist I have found PrincipiaScientific a priceless source for evaluating climate science with the comments and reference to other sources being a more robust process than the possibility of incestuous peer review.
This article is an absolute betrayal of those standards There is no written report to assess the science in relation to vaccinations with a view to long term improvements in medical research and outcomes including a basis for cross reference.
Evaluating an alleged cluster of deceased doctors Identifying commonalities and coincidences in relation to coroners reports, fields of study etc would be appropriate for an investigative journalist selling newspapers, but what appears to be speculative ejaculation is not science and the hypothesis needs a.lot more research and testing.
I am proud of what Dr. Tim has done. He should be a certified world treasure. Dr Patrick expounding solutions and having done the earlier hard yards. (walked the talk) Dr Will being steadfast and honorable in television interviews while being ridiculed and abused. So many great people long past their retirement continuing to serve science, the environment and mankind. And those now gone who continued to serve up until their last breath.
This article gives corrupt climate scientists a place to thrust their swords. (Lao Tzu)
I suggest the chairman of PrincipiaScientific consider whether the chief executive should be allowed to be both judge and prosecutor and if an evolution of job description would be prudent. I suggest the chief executive of PrincipiaScientific consider an unhurried and productive transition to a new chief executive so he can proudly claim to have been honorable in accepting an error of judgement and leave the many contributors to PrincipiaScientific and the organization itself unsullied by that error.
I look forward to reading the science on vaccines and the science or otherwise of a cluster of deaths. Good things take time. Evolution, not change.
In Christchurch and Auckland, New Zealand, we currently have an epidemic of measles.. The hypotheses is the vaccination rate is currently below the 95%.
We all make mistakes and we can all do better.
Matt
Reply
Herb Rose
| #
Hi Matt,
The golden rule is not a good guide because it applies your beliefs to everyone else which is the source of much of our problems (police planting evidence). According to the golden rule an alcoholic should give drinks to kids because they would like them to reciprocate and give drinks to them. A smoker should do the same. People have the right to determine what is right for themselves but that does not mean that their standards are right for everyone else. Isn’t a rapist abiding by the golden rule? A proper guide is the platinum rule which state “Be kind to others”. This changes the focus from oneself to the needs of others.
As to the damning of PSI for articles posted, all publications and news organization chose the subjects they report on which is an act of editorializing and censorship. If they didn’t the platforms would be full of contradictions and confusion. It is up to readers to use their own critical analysis to decide if what is being written has a valid point or is just propaganda.
In general I dismiss broad conspiracy theories because they are based on unrealistic assumptions. These start with that there is a group or organization that know how events will unfold and manipulate things so these events will bring about results beneficial to them. This involves a group not only with extraordinary forsight but a unified objective, the ability of individuals to suppress their own egos to accomplish the common goal, and the ability to not only keep their action secret by not telling anyone about them, but also the ability to control those they are using to accomplish their goals to an unbelievable extent. These are all unrealistic assumptions. In reality if more than two people know a secret it is no longer a secret.
It is easy to look back at events and to make connections creating a conspiracy by those who benefitted from the events. It is impossible to make plans that include every possibility and proceed as clockwork. I don’t believe that in reality conspiracies often work unless there are extraordinary circumstances, like a war, that unites people in which case a few of them might work in a limited time frame (location of D Day invasion).
Have a good day,
Herb
Reply
Matt Holl
| #
Hi Herb.
I refer you to PSI’s Core Values, Mission Statement, and Peer Review In Open Media.
One of the objectives, I believe, is to inform people of the dangers and misdirection of “climate alarmism” by countering alarmism with the adherence to sound science and PSI’s principles. To then read articles headlined with “vaccination alarmism” is a betrayal of the scientific method and PSI’s mission statement. Double standards and hypocrisy are beautiful things but do not traverse the realms of such exquisiteness. (clumsy satire)
The underlying science of the Vaccination Alarmism could very well be valid but some headlines and content could generously be described as “unfortunate” even if they were only in the comments section. Without clarification and identification of objectives action can be counter productive and akin to tilting at windmills.
Are the objectives “Anti Vaccination” or are the objectives to use science to inform, identify any dangers, risks, and harm resulting from vaccination regimes and to find positive contributory outcomes.
The single most important concept in monitoring environmental outcomes or social policy is “cumulative effect”. Understanding cumulative effect allows one to identify “unintended consequences”. If the objective is only “anti Vaccination” then the consequences are a probable lessening of PSI’s credibility and the corrosion of the positive cumulative effect PSI has created to date.
I like your platinum rule and your considered articles but would suggest the “golden rule” has stood the test of time for good reason.
A rapist would not wish to be raped, a smoker forced to smoke, a drinker made to drink. I would suggest, Herb, you have applied artistic licence to said rule. In this case the concept of platinum and gold could be the same element coated with differing veneers.
My comments are not damning of this website but a challenge for a reality check as a measure of respect and admiration. Many of the fine contributors to this site appear to share a concern about fraud and deception masquerading as science and the consequent manipulations of society and the subsequent wild eyed, frothing at the mouth, tilting at windmills, absolutely sincere behavior of some of the manipulated masses.
I remain your humble servant.
Matt.
Reply
Chris Marcil
| #
In order to be skeptical all voices must be heard. I am hearing a lot of silencing. It does sound strange. If there is an epidemic of doctor murders it should be investigated. The reasons for their death should be determined. Perhaps their is more to the story, maybe not. Screaming that something is not right just because a person says so is not an argument. If someone wishes to counter then report on a claim that is made that contradicts it.
Reply
John Doran
| #
http://www.naturalnews.com
A site the globalist elite & their loony left acolytes have tried to ban.
I put in the search box:
Nagalese & got 2 results.
vaccines autism & got 10 results on the first page & 20 pages of results.
Jonas Salk cancer & got 10 results first page & 20 pages of results.
Do the research.
It seems the depopulation/eugenicist/environmentalist plot goes back beyond way beyond the Nazis in power today.
Book: Merchants Of Despair, Radical Environmentalists, Criminal Pseudo-Scientists, and the Fatal Cult Of Antihumanism.
By Robert Zubrin, PhD nuclear engineer with 9 patents to his name or pending.
Safe clean nuclear energy is being demonised & underfunded & buried under bureaucracy & over zealous safety requirements as well as constantly changing specifications during the construction process.
Humans are being culled.
John Doran.
Reply
John Doran
| #
Congrats on the courage to air these difficult subjects, John, & on the number of Trolls you’re attracting.
The nearer the target you go, the more flak you’ll get.
A peer-reviewed paper:
http://www.wattsupwiththat.com/2014/10/02/and-climate-internet-trolls-are-some-of-the-worst/
John Doran.
Reply
John O'Sullivan
| #
Thanks John. Another article on the subject is in the pipeline.
Reply