Diatom surprise could rewrite the global carbon cycle

When it comes to diatoms that live in the ocean, new research suggests that photosynthesis is not the only strategy for accumulating carbon

Instead, these single-celled plankton are also building biomass by feeding directly on organic carbon in wide swaths of the ocean.

These new findings could lead researchers to reduce their estimate of how much carbon dioxide diatoms pull out of the air via photosynthesis, which in turn, could alter our understanding of the global carbon cycle.

This research is led by bioengineers, bioinformatics experts and other genomics researchers at the University of California San Diego. The findings are published in Science Advances on July 17, 2024. The paper is titled “Mixotrophic growth of a ubiquitous marine diatom.”

The team showed that the diatom Cylindrotheca closterium, which is found in oceans around the world, regularly performs a simultaneous mix of both photosynthesis and direct eating of carbon from organic sources such as plankton.

In more than 70 percent of the water samples the researchers analyzed from oceans around the world, the team found signs of simultaneous photosynthesis and direct organic carbon consumption from Cylindrotheca closterium.

The team also showed that this diatom species can grow much faster when consuming organic carbon in addition to photosynthesis.

Furthermore, the new research hints at the tantalizing possibility that specific species of bacteria are feeding organic carbon directly to a large percentage of these diatoms living all across the global ocean.

This work is based on a genome-scale metabolic modeling approach that the team used to unravel the metabolism of the diatom Cylindrotheca closterium. The researchers constrained their genome-scale metabolic model with global gene expression data obtained from the TARA ocean expedition.

The researchers believe this is the first time genome-scale models have been used at a global scale.

The team’s new metabolic modeling data support recent lab experiments suggesting that some diatoms may rely on strategies other than photosynthesis to intake the carbon they need to survive, thrive and build biomass.

The UC San Diego-led team is in the process of expanding the scope of the project to determine how widespread this non-photosynthetic activity is among other diatom species.

Are ocean bacteria feeding diatoms?

When the team looked at the physical and chemical parameters measured in their ocean water samples—including temperature, pH, salinity, light, nitrogen and carbon availability—they did not find any correlation between those parameters and a tendency by the diatoms to steer away from photosynthesis-only strategies.

However, the team found a clear signal when exploring specific bacterial populations co-existing with the diatom Cylindrotheca closterium in the ocean water samples. This finding hints at bacteria-diatom interactions that drive the simultaneous mix of photosynthesis and direct consumption of organic carbon—a phenomenon known as “mixotrophy.”

The team believes that specific bacteria may be feeding the diatoms directly, helping these diatoms to be one of the most successful and important microbes on the planet, in terms of oxygen production, carbon sequestration, and as a foundation of food webs that support nearly all life in the ocean.

“Diatoms are major contributors to marine food chains and key drivers of the global carbon cycle. Previously, we have estimated all carbon cycling models on the assumption that the only role that diatoms play is in carbon dioxide fixation,” said UC San Diego Professor Karsten Zengler, professor in the Departments of Pediatrics and Bioengineering and researcher in the Center for Microbiome Innovation at the Jacobs School of Engineering.

“Our findings demonstrate that this is not the case, but that diatoms simultaneously also eat organic carbon. In other words, we have shown that diatoms do not rely exclusively on carbon dioxide fixation for their growth and biomass production. We believe these results will have major implications for our understanding of global carbon cycling.”

“While there have been curious observations in the laboratory regarding diatoms deviating from photosynthesis, it has been impossible to test what kind of metabolism these diatoms perform in the ocean—until now. This is because there are many, many genes involved in this process, and it’s very difficult to delineate what process is active from gene expression data alone. Our approach gets around this challenge.”

The research team hopes this work will stimulate interest in taking a much closer look at our understanding of the global carbon cycle, taking into consideration this new broader understanding of how ocean diatoms get their carbon.

What the bacteria feeding the diatoms may be getting out of the relationship is another question for further research.

See more here phys.org

Header image: Wikipedia

Please Donate Below To Support Our Ongoing Work To Defend The Scientific Method

PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL, legally registered in the UK as a company incorporated for charitable purposes. Head Office: 27 Old Gloucester Street, London WC1N 3AX. 

Trackback from your site.

Comments (8)

  • Avatar

    Chris*

    |

    Hooray! at last . Acknowledgement that 71% of Earth ‘s surface is covered in oceans which are full of phytoplankton which is a bacteria, and diatoms. These microscopic organisms take up ash ( nutrients) from major bush fires and CO2 to feed and produce these keystone species for aquatic food chains. Phytoplankton produces 60% of Earths oxygen. CO2 has many essential uses. It is taken up by rain which makes rain acidic. This in turn dissolves minerals in the soil thus making them available for plants. For example silica. Silica makes plants cell walls strong, without silica plants would just be slime on the ground. Without CO2 there would be no life on the surface of the Earth nor in the oceans/ waterways.

    Reply

  • Avatar

    Wisenox

    |

    When light hits chloroplasts, the energy is used to make glucose. How does this work? Light has energy levels that can be mapped using geometry. The energy transfer found in photosynthesis follows the same rules as particles.
    I mentioned in here that I was working on a number theory model. As crazy as it sounds, I can map this. Likewise, the model adequately provides visualizations for how particles interact, how information is retained, where prime numbers come from, what Pi is and why it describes the wrong thing, why light acts as a particle and a wave, what a wave is, where the elementary sits and how much pi/phi is enclosed in it, and more.
    It all fits in the same model, nuts.
    At the very least, it will be an interesting read.

    Reply

    • Avatar

      Wisenox

      |

      Full circle, I feel that I can identify Planck’s Constant.

      Reply

      • Avatar

        Herb Rose

        |

        Hi Wisenox,
        Planck’s constant is a result of Planck’s Law stating that the energy of a wave is a function of its frequency. Anyone familiar with ocean waves can attest to the fact that the energy of wave is a function of its amplitude, not its frequency.
        Energy (and light) is not quantized but a wave, it is the matter absorbing or emitting energy that gives it its quantum attributes.
        Herb

        Reply

        • Avatar

          Wisenox

          |

          My explanation describes that process, and I wasn’t aware of the intricacies.
          I know what it is, why it’s somewhat of a variable, and how it relates to frequencies and wavelengths.
          In the same explanation, I can explain both the illusion and duality of Pi.

          Reply

        • Avatar

          Herb Rose

          |

          Hi Wisenox,
          All matter absorbs energy regardless of its electron structure. Energy is attracted to positive matter (protons) and repels negative matter (electrons. It is the electron structures that determine the wave lengths of energy reaching the nucleus. here Is no duality to energy. Its is a field that is distinct from matter. Light is a disturbance in the energy field.
          The electric (matter force and the energy (gravity magnetism) behave in opposite manners. When a positive and negative charges get closer the radiated electric field decreases (neUtron). WheN opposite poles of magnets get closer the size and strength of the radiated magnetic field increases.
          Herb

          Reply

          • Avatar

            Wisenox

            |

            Pi has a dual relationship to energy. Planck’s constant is intricately linked to it.

  • Avatar

    Jerry Krause

    |

    Hi PSI Readers,

    The abstract of this recent paper begins “Diatoms are major players in the global carbon cycle, and their metabolism is affected by ocean conditions. Understanding the impact of changing inorganic nutrients in the oceans on diatoms is crucial, given the changes in global carbon dioxide levels.” And in this article there is no reference to'”the impact of changing inorganic nutrients in the oceans on diatoms.”

    Have a good day

    Reply

Leave a comment

Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment.
Share via