Data Scientist: USB Cards ‘Uploaded to Voting Machines’ over 24 Times
Gregory Stenstrom, a poll watcher in Pennsylvania and CEO of a data sciences company, testified on Wednesday that he witnessed over 24 instances of USB cards being connected to voting machines during the ballot counting process.
Stenstrom spoke at a State Senate Majority Policy Committee hearing in Gettysburg, PA. He addressed his observations as a poll watcher in Delaware County, PA:
I personally observed USB cards being uploaded to voting machines by the voting machine warehouse supervisor on multiple occasions. I saw this personally. I brought it to the attention of the deputy sheriff who was there stationed, who was a senior law enforcement officer, and I brought to the attention of the clerk of elections.
I brought it to their attention. I objected, and I said this person is not being observed. He’s not part of the process that I can see, and he’s walking in with baggies — which we have pictures of and it was submitted in our affidavits — and he was sticking these USBs into the machines.
So I personally witnessed that happen over 24 times. We have multiple other witnesses who saw it, including Democrat poll watchers.
Stenstrom said he had been told by U.S. Attorney William McSwain such conduct with USBs and voting machines is unusual.
“As of today, 47 USB cards are missing, and they are nowhere to be found,” added Stenstrom. “I was told personally that these 24 to 30 cards that were uploaded weren’t there.”
Stenstrom stated he and a Democrat poll watcher observed between 60,000 and 70,000 unopened mail-in ballots in a locked room:
What I observed in the locked room in the back office was 70,000 unopened mail-in ballots. They were in boxes of 500, stacked in neatly. The gentleman that came in with me is a Democrat poll watcher [and] is a forensic pathologist, a very detailed, very dedicated man and he took meticulous notes, as well, and I verified with him, “Are you seeing what I’m seeing?”
We both agreed — a GOP poll watcher and a Democrat poll watcher — that we had witnessed 60 to 70,000 [unopened mail-in ballots]. We had a little bit of a disagreement there. The problem with that was by that time the mail-in ballots had already been counted. So 120,000 mail-in ballots had already been counted, posted, and done. So my question is, where to the 70,000 ballots go?
And nobody knows we have a picture in here of a large number of boxes that I took that were filled with what appeared to be ballots sitting by the BlueCrest machine. They were there for about three hours and then they disappeared.
Stenstrom described the ballot counting process incorporating elements of “kabuki theater.”
Stenstrom was initially obstructed in his attempts to observe the goings on within the “counting center” on Election Day:
I had been told that there were 10 to 20 GOP poll watchers down there [at the counting center], and everything was well in hand, and out of curiosity I decided to go down. I arrived at six o’clock with four other gentlemen — former military and some good citizens from Delaware County — and we weren’t allowed to get in until eleven o’clock at night, and we had to get some legal help to get us in. So it took us five hours to get upstairs.
[…]
As as an expert in this, I think it’s impossible to verify the validity of about 100,000 to 120,000 votes. Delaware County’s got 425,000 registered voters. Approximately 300,000 of them voted I don’t know what they exact number … but of that number over 100,000 are in question in my mind.
Stenstrom described the election process as “forensically destructive” and lacking a verifiable chain of custody for ballots between their casting and counting:
What I saw as a friend’s six expert was an election process that was forensically destructive in the manner it was conducted, with the envelopes being separated from the ballots and gone to the other side of the room. The problem with that, from being forensically destructive, is that when you go to do a recount, okay, the machines do a pretty good job of recounting so if I have 120,000 mail-in ballots at one side of the room and envelopes at the other side of the room, it’s still going to come out 102,000 votes for Vice President Biden and 18,000 votes for President Trump. I don’t care how many times you recount those votes. Ballots are going to come out the same every time. So the notion of a recount in a forensically destructive process doesn’t work very well.
What we saw there — what I saw there — was a chain of custody in all cases that was broken. [It] was broken for the mail-in ballots, the drop box ballots, the Election Day USB card flash drives.
Stenstrom said all procedures defined by the Delaware County Board of Elections regarding the chain of custody for ballots were not followed.
Read more at www.breitbart.com
PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL, legally registered in the UK as a company 
incorporated for charitable purposes. Head Office: 27 Old Gloucester Street, London WC1N 3AX.
Please DONATE TODAY To Help Our Non-Profit Mission To Defend The Scientific Method
Trackback from your site.
Herb Rose
| #
All paper ballots were encrypted with water marks. When a mail-in ballot was requested the water mark was assigned to that vote and recorded by the post office as being mailed (encoded envelopes). If voter did not return the ballot by mail and was going to vote in person they needed to bring in the mailed ballot and use it or they would not be able to vote. I assume that the voting machines scanned ballots to ensure they had valid water marks and had not already been cast.
Since there were more ballots printed than mailed or used for in-person voting there would be a supply of blank ballots that could be filled out as desired and stored. By repeatedly recording the current tally of the voting counting machine and comparing it with election results from other areas one could determine how many pre filled out ballots needed to be substituted for legitimate ballots to achieve the desired results.
If the encryption code of ballots do not match either the code recorded as being mailed or cast during polling hours it is clearly a fraudulent ballot and those in charge of the unused ballots and voting should be given free room and board in prison for life (a life term can be any number of years if the person is shot when leaving jail).
Reply
Mervyn
| #
All this election fraud being ignored by the fake media and establishment is an insult to democracy.
Reply
AIM
| #
Another guy who doesn’t have the first clue about how elections are conducted. We have secret ballots which means that once a voter’s identity is confirmed, you separate the ballot from the envelope. Otherwise, people would be able to connect your ballot back to your identity and potentially reveal how you voted to the world.
Reply
Herb Rose
| #
In Pennsylvania when a mail-in ballot was requested it was mailed along with a return envelope to the person. The instructions were to take the ballot and return envelope out of the received envelope and discard the envelope. Fill out you ballot then put in the provided envelope and mail it back. If you did not use the return envelope your vote was not opened or counted. The mail have records of the ballot being sent to you and returned by you not how you voted.
When the vote was received it was taken out of the envelope (no return address) tabulated and the envelope discarded.
If 500,000 ballots were mailed out those ballots would be numbered from xxx0000001 to xxx500000. If a ballot with a number greater than xxx5000000 was registered by the voting machine by substitution or addition it was voting fraud.
If a polling location was send ballots marked abc0001 to abc5000 and the voting machine recorded ballot abc3500 being the last ballot cast when the poll closed, any ballot with a number that didn’t have the correct prefix or a number greater than 3500 would be voter fraud.
They do not have to connect any ballot to any voter only detect illegitimate ballots to determine how much fraud occurred.
Reply
Joseph Olson
| #
“Fraction Magic” video by Beverly Harris in 2015 at > BlackBoxVoting(.)org
Vote rigging by Hart InterCivic and Election Systems & Software (ES&S) known by RINOs Abbott, Patrick and Paxton who did nothing.
“Interview on Electronic Vote Fraud” by CD Media with Russ Ramsland at Brighteon
a million PDJT votes flipped to Beijing Biden, also US House seats
Reply