COVID19: ‘test, test, test’ is ‘wrong, wrong wrong’

Written by John O'Sullivan on September 26, 2020. Posted in Current News

As reported in the New York Times last week (September 17, 2020) a dose of sanity appeared at the CDC when it finally decided it was probably better policy to not test people who have no symptoms of Covid-19.

As the NY Times reported:

“The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention quietly modified its coronavirus testing guidelines this week to exclude people who do not have symptoms of Covid-19 — even if they have been recently exposed to the virus.”

Obviously, the announcement triggered dissent from all the profiteers of the scamdemic. This includes the NY Times itself, which then went on to lament this step towards common sense by then quoting a string of medical professionals (with skin in the game) who refuse to see the bigger picture of the damage inflicted on society because of the ‘lockdown’ policies, i.e. the hidden non-COVID deaths due to deferred operations, undiagnosed cancers, suicides, depression, business bankruptcies, domestic abuse, etc.

The New York Times, biased medicos, big corporations, our politicians and all fellow pandemic profiteers want to test everyone for COVID19 because the more we test, the more these flawed tests will throw out ‘asymptomatic’ (not sick) positives. This then creates the huge rise in ‘cases’ reported daily in the media to justify more draconian ‘lockdown’ measures.

As we reported before, the key to the insanity is the PCR test relied on for ‘diagnosing’ COVID19  – a test which was never designed or certified to be used as a virus diagnostic tool and is known to be incorrect 90 percent of the time. It is unscientific and immoral – and possibly criminal – for government(s) to portray it as such.

Indeed, do you remember the time before this snowflake, precautionary principle mindset froze society? A time when old school medicine taught us that you generally never test anyone who presents no symptoms and only test a patient who actually presents themselves as feeling ill from what appears to be a respiratory disease.

In the UK our dullard Prime Minister, Boris Johnson, made it policy to test at least 100,000 every day! Any epidemiologist worthy of that title could tell that the more you search for a disease the more likely you will find it.

And as time has gone on, more researchers are showing COVID-19 may not be infectious at all. We know that the UK government was deceptive on this issue because it quietly downgraded the status of the disease as a ‘High consequence infectious diseases (HCID)’ on March 19, 2020,  the week before it implemented the national ‘lockdown.’

Deception, fear-mongering and fake science were the tools used to brow beat the public into compliance ready for the World Economic Forum’s ‘Great Reset’ – which is more about imposing global un-elected socialist government than public health.

As with man-made global warming, the underpinning of this planned societal shift was junk science. Disease, not climate change, was the new Great Danger. Fear of infection and death from this novel coronavirus worked for a while.

But six months into this incessant panic porn and – as we saw with global warming hype – the science begins to unravel. All those labelled as carriers are not infecting others. Large outbreaks of the ‘infection’ are occurring mostly where testing is happening most frequently. Can you see the problem here?

At some point even the average low information voter wakes up to the screamingly obvious fact that this pandemic now is all about ‘CASES’ as opposed to deaths (see graph below)

As we exposed in earlier articles, the mainstream narrative is based on increased PCR testing showing more positive results. The so-called journalists who are paid six-figure salaries to analyze and discern truth from fiction are exposed as mere shills to their corporate puppet masters and do not (cannot) report the deception going on here.

Our political masters have been deliberately misconstruing covid ‘cases’ as ‘infections’ since the peak of the pandemic passed in May. Talking heads on television news have been all in on fooling the masses with ideas of ‘asymptomatic’ spread.

But there is no scientific evidence to back that claim. But what is provable scientifically is that the tests commonly relied on – the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) tests – are known to give False Positives in as many as 9 out of 10 instances, (see Study Finds Immunity to Coronavirus Linked to the Common Cold ).

As we explained in other articles, the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) method is simply a clever manufacturing technique for quickly making millions, even billions, of copies of a specific DNA sample. The sole purpose of the test, according to inventor, Kary Mullins, was to help scientists work from a very small sample of DNA and multiply (or ‘amplify’) it to more clinically usable amounts for lab study.

And let’s keep in mind that 20 percent of common colds are due to coronavirus. [1]

Over time, many of us have become aware of colleagues, friends and family who have themselves, or known via someone else, instances where someone has tested positive for COVID19 but they report they feel perfectly fine. As the joke goes: it is the only deadly disease you need to be tested for to know if you have it.

The tests themselves are wholly unreliable for medical diagnosis because they cannot offer a binary – yes or no – answer to any question. They may show the presence of a very, very small part of a piece of matter (a particular set of nucleotide) that may, or may not be from the COVID virus. But as to proving someone is actually ill – not possible!

The PCR test is a manufacturing process of multiplying cycles to grow RNA – a slick technique for biological replication in a lab. Technically, the output from them may be deemed ‘scientifically meaningless.’

Meaningless because the more each PCR test cycle is repeated in the lab the more any error in the sampling gets magnified.

The common protocol for most labs performing COVID testing with these PCR’s is to run 30 to 40 reproduction (amplification) cycles. As stated above, the outcome is not a binary positive or negative outcome as you would find, for example, with a pregnancy test.

Instead, the samples are grown repeatedly until an arbitrary point is reached (because there is no standard protocol) when someone decides to call a halt in the amplification cycling process and a subjective determination of ‘positive’ or ‘negative’ gets made. Is this good science? Not at all.

In effect, that is 30 to 40 times a magnification of the original error in sampling. In Britain the NHS is typically repeating the reproduction cycle 45 times and disingenuously creating a massive ‘spread’ of false positives.
Also see https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/fullarticle/2766097

We must hold our leaders and their appointed experts in the health bureaucracy to account. The longer this travesty of ‘test, test, test’ continues the more they get away with the Big Lie of asymptomatic COVID19 and the more needless harm is inflicted on society.

Please spread the word to anyone who still hasn’t got the message: these so-called PCR positive ‘Cases’ are NOT proof of an infection. Better yet, tell them that the CDC even now admits almost NO ONE dies from COVID19. [2]

The scientific and medical experts have failed the public consistently during this COVID-19 scamdemic. The cause may go further than mere incompetence, with a corrupt elite likely exploiting the crisis to push their preferred technocratic political agenda of totalitarian globalism.

If the fools in government do not soon disavow the PCR test as a diagnostic tool – despite a relentless stream of hard evidence – then they must be brought to justice for abuse of public office. Because it is clear that the key beneficiaries of this pandemic farce are the big corporations, online businesses, pharmaceutical companies and academics who profit from the crony capitalist misery inflicted on us all.

[1] https://www.webmd.com/cold-and-flu/cold-guide/common_cold_causes

[2] https://principia-scientific.com/cdc-latest-confession-almost-no-one-infected-died-from-covid19/

About the author: John O’Sullivan John is CEO and co-founder (with Dr Tim Ball) of Principia Scientific International (PSI).  John is a seasoned science writer and legal analyst who assisted Dr Ball in defeating world leading climate expert, Michael ‘hockey stick’ Mann in the ‘science trial of the century‘. O’Sullivan is credited as the visionary who formed the original ‘Slayers’ group of scientists in 2010 who then collaborated in creating the world’s first full-volume debunk of the greenhouse gas theory plus their new follow-up book.

PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL, legally registered in the UK as a company incorporated for charitable purposes. Head Office: 27 Old Gloucester Street, London WC1N 3AX. 

Please DONATE TODAY To Help Our Non-Profit Mission To Defend The Scientific Method.

Trackback from your site.