Covid vaccines are killing babies in first trimester at astonishing rate
Dr. Peter McCullough, professor of medicine at Texas A&M, warns against vaccinating pregnant women for covid-19. He said the covid vaccines are completely unnecessary for pregnant women and are “directly killing babies in the first trimester.”
Dr. McCullough was recently interviewed by Mike Adams on Brighteon Conversations. He discussed effective prophylactics, nutraceuticals, treatments and antibody infusions for covid-19. He iterated that these approaches are successful for the elderly and at-risk populations. And for the majority of people under age 50, he said getting over covid-19 is a “breeze.”
Common sense: Pregnant women and babies should never get covid vaccines
Most importantly, pregnant women and their developing fetuses should not be subjected to repeated medical experimentation all because they might get a potential infection that they can readily overcome.
“Pregnant women can breeze right through covid-19,” said Dr. McCullough. “No woman should ever take the risk with the covid-19 vaccine during pregnancy, period.” He said treatments like hydroxychloroquine, zinc and prednisone are safe for pregnant women, but the covid-19 vaccines were never tested on pregnant women in the clinical studies because it is unethical to put pregnant women through such abuse. Therefore, the study designs did not test for mutagenic or reproductive defects.
A new study, published in the New England Journal of Medicine, corroborates Dr. McCullough’s common sense claims. The study, “Preliminary Findings of mRNA Covid-19 Vaccine Safety in Pregnant Persons” finds that covid vaccines cause spontaneous abortions in 104 out of 127 pregnant women! This means that the vaccine is disrupting critical stages of early prenatal development, and is killing four out of five babies in the first 20 weeks of gestation.
The CDC’s Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) and the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists continue to recommend that pregnant women have access to COVID-19 vaccines. These authoritative, vaccine-worshiping organizations refuse to rescind their recommendations, even though preliminary evidence shows that these experimental vaccines cause an 82 percent spontaneous abortion rate.
Once upon a time, there was a certain level of common sense in the medical community on the issue of protecting pregnant women from potentially harmful substances. Fetal development is a critical and delicate process, especially in the first trimester, when vital organs and physiological functions are taking form.
Infertility from covid-19 vaccines is not a conspiracy theory; it’s a plausible outcome
With the number of spontaneous abortions climbing, it has become apparent that the lab engineered spike protein was designed to depopulate the human race. Infertility caused by covid-19 vaccines is not a conspiracy theory. It’s a macabre experiment initiating a scientific process that exploits human physiology.
The covid-19 vaccines are translating spike proteins in human cells, and delivering this foreign lab-made toxin into the bloodstream, where they can accumulate in reproductive organs. These spike proteins are attacking blood vessels and causing severe inflammation in the heart. Dr. McCullough says these systemic vaccine injuries are atrocities that we now know a great deal about.
Furthermore, as the immune system detects the presence of spike proteins in the blood, immune responsive cells will attack them (a process that was anticipated in accordance with traditional vaccine science). These spike proteins contain a homologous form of syncytin-1, which resembles a natural protein in humans.
If the immune cells are trained to attack the syncytin-1 spike proteins, they could attack the natural form as well, a protein that is created from human endogenous retroviruses and is responsible for the placenta development in humans. If the human body begins to attack its own placenta cells, then females will have another serious obstacle to overcome when attempting to conceive.
See more here: pandemic.news
Please Donate Below To Support Our Ongoing Work To Expose The Lies About COVID19
PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL, legally registered in the UK as a company 
incorporated for charitable purposes. Head Office: 27 Old Gloucester Street, London WC1N 3AX.
Trackback from your site.
very old white guy
| #
and yet they keep calling the shots “vaccines”.
Reply
Mark Tapley
| #
The eugenics movement has come a long way from when first introduced through the theories compiled by the British aristocrat Darwin in his “On the Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection, or The Preservation of Favored Races In The Struggle For Life. The eugenics program really got its start by a group of scientists in the U.S. in 1904 employing new race theories in an attempt to cull those in the country (mostly poor whites) who did not meet the qualifications of the elites who were funding and lending support to this scheme including the Rockefeller and Carnegie Foundations Mrs. Harriman, the Bush family, Margaret Sanger of the new Planned Parenthood and Chief Justice of the Supreme Court Oliver Wendell Holmes. The elite’s goal was to immediately sterilize the bottom tenth or fourteen million people in the U.S. and millions more world wide. Ultimately over 60,000 people were forcibly sterilized in 26 states. The Carrie Buck case that went all the way to the lackeys on the Supreme Court is an example of how disgraceful, distorted and determined zealots with a cause can become when they can use the power of government and “the Law.”
This eugenics movement was augmented by the creation of the 1918 “pandemic” by the Rockefeller Foundation with their series of blood toxin injections and control of the media. The allopathic germ theory fraud propelled by Rockefeller money gained control of all medical schools and launched big Pharma while continuously brainwashing the ignorant livestock on the safety and effectiveness of blood toxin injection for every contagion imagined.
Academic elite icon Bernard Shaw coined the term “useless eaters” which according to The club of Rome encompass about 90% of the worlds population. Today the eugenics movement has become more sophisticated and has now incorporated not only the fake virus, fake numbers, fake test along with the fake vaccine but also has also woven climate change into the scam. The end goal of these same elite is not only depopulation which they openly proclaim but the draconian imposition of their long planned Agenda 20300-21 on all of the remaining serfs needed to keep things functioning. The most amazing thing is that so many people are willing participants in their own destruction.
https://brendandmurphy.com/alison-mcdowell-how-engineered-pandemics-and-poverty-profit-the-elite-truthiverse-episode-15/
https://www.bitchute.com/video/4M6xQpxZs7if/
Reply
Chet Tomsick
| #
What kind of BS is this? I went to the referenced NE Journal of Medicine and did NOT find any corroboration of Dr. McCullough’s claims on spontaneous abortions. Instead I found this:
“Conclusions: Preliminary findings did not show obvious safety signals among pregnant persons who received mRNA Covid-19 vaccines. “
Reply
j
| #
You actually have to read the study, not the abstract only. Click full text link on the right side.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8117969/
Link to full study. I do not understand how the abstract can consider this safe to women when so many had spontaneous abortions. Truly remarkable.
Reply
Tracy
| #
That is because of their INTENTIONAL MISINTERPRETATION OF OBVIOUS DATA. It is intentional hiding the true findings, & intentional obsfucation of the truth of the matter! That they would take such clear & dangerous findings, & then present a lie, is beyond the limits of science. It is OUTRIGHT LYING, AGAINST ALL CONTRARY EVIDENCE.
Reply
Brian Kobernuss
| #
I read the article. ( https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8117969/ )
Chet Tomsick is correct. The article claims to have found a 12.6% miscarriage rate and a 1.2% combined induced abortion and ectopic pregnancy rate, and an 86.1% live birth rate – just as is alluded to in the conclusion.
I can only conceive that Dr. Peter McCullough misread the 104 miscarriages out of 827 pregnancies figure (Table 4) as instead the 104 out of 127 that he reports in this article.
The difference between a 12.6% spontaneous abortion rate and this article’s (mis)reported 82% rate of the same, is night and day. The latter would be quite alarming, whereas as I understand it, the former is unfortunately quite normal.
I will be the first to trumpet real data on these shots causing infertility – but folks, not reading the material is how we got into this dang mess in the first place.
This study itself could be compromised, don’t know, wasn’t there – but lets not say that a study finds something that it does not.
Reply
Steve titcombe
| #
I did read the study. There were 96 spontaneous abortions in first trimester of total 827 pregnancies. Considering that normal rate for the first trimester is about 15% then there is no issue. This article’s author is deliberately attempting to mislead lazy readers
Reply
Bob
| #
Thats not quite right. A miscarriage can only occur in the first 20 weeks of pregnancy. Anything after that is called a still birth. 700 of the 827 women enrolled in the study after 20 weeks of pregnancy, so by definition they cannot have a miscarriage. Therefore the number is actually 104/127 miscarriage, which is 82% but that number is only so high because most of the women from the study are still pregnant, so their pregnancies aren’t “completed” yet like those who had miscarriages early. It is still odd why they chose to represent the number as 104/827 instead of 104/127, but the percentage of pregnancies completed in miscarriages will certainly come down when all of the women who enrolled in the study give birth and complete their pregnancies.
Reply
Brian Kobernuss
| #
I stand corrected – the 104/127 figure is correct, albeit misleading. (the study is not finished, and this skews the statistics)
This is a bit confusing as there are a few sub-criteria we are talking about here.
The first set is the full 3958 pregnant women enrolled in the v-safe pregnancy registry (and who received an mRNA shot).
Of those, 827 ended their pregnancy one way or another by the end of the study, implying that 3131 were still pregnant.
Of the 827 who completed their pregnancies, 700 received their mRNA shot while in the third trimester of pregnancy (≥28 weeks), which precludes the possibility of having a spontaneous abortion aka miscarriage (<20 weeks). Anyone who has made it to the third trimester has passed the range of possibly having a miscarriage.
This implies that only 127 women met all of the following criteria; a) enrolled in the v-safe pregnancy registry, b) finished their pregnancies one way or another, c) received the mRNA shot while less than 28 weeks pregnant. These indeed would be the only women out of the 827 who could possibly have miscarried by the time they stopped collecting data for these preliminary findings (February 28, ’21)
Furthermore, considering that the first vaccine in the US was given on December 14, ’20, this gives only an 11 week maximum window for the 127 women that received the shot before the 28th week of pregnancy but had also ended their pregnancy by February 28. This means the maximum term among these 127 women was about 39 weeks on Feb 28 (the minimum would be 0). The vaccination rate in this time frame seems largely linear, so if we get the mean probable vaccination date between Dec. 14 and Feb 28, we get January 20th, giving them about a 5.5 week average window of further pregnancy. If we also assume an evenly distributed range of time-pregnant among these 127 women, we get a mean pregnancy of 14 weeks (28/2). Therefore among these 127 women, the average pregnancy length would be about 20 weeks – and that’s before shaving off time for women who ended their term before Feb 28.
If week take this 20 week average, we can safely say that the vast majority of women who end their term at 20 weeks do not give a live birth – so, finding that 104 out of these 127 women had miscarriages should not be at all surprising.
There also would be a figure of women from amongst the 3131 still pregnant by Feb 28 who received the mRNA shot while less than 28 weeks pregnant. This data does not appear to show in this study.
So most importantly we can conclude that we really need to wait for this study to publish its final report after all pregnancies have concluded to be able to spout off what the vaccine’s miscarriage rate is.
In the meantime, just don’t take the goddamn shot, yeah?
Reply
Bob
| #
The text preceding table 4 states that most of the test subjects haven’t completed their pregnancies yet. When the conclusions were written, there were 827 completed pregnancies, of which 104 were “completed” by miscarriage. Many more women from the trial are still pregnant and we will have to wait about 9 months from the end of the trial period to determine the total percentage that ended in miscarriage.
Reply