Covid jabs caused at least 17 million deaths according to recent study
If evidence, science logic or concern for populations mattered at all, these jabs would have been pulled before they even started to be used. It makes me think killing people was the goal
This article, COVID-19 vaccine-associated mortality in the Southern Hemisphere, was published several months ago but I’ve only just seen it. At 180 pages long, it is not a light read. But the information within it makes it one we must all be aware of.
I will extract portions of the Abstract below. I have put any especially important (in my opinion) text in bold and italics. ACM = All Cause Mortality.
Abstract
Seventeen equatorial and Southern-Hemisphere countries were studied (Argentina, Australia, Bolivia, Brazil, Chile, Colombia, Ecuador, Malaysia, New Zealand, Paraguay, Peru, Philippines, Singapore, South Africa, Suriname, Thailand, Uruguay), which comprise 9.10 percent of worldwide population, 10.3 percent of worldwide COVID-19 injections (vaccination rate of 1.91 injections per person, all ages), virtually every COVID-19 vaccine type and manufacturer, and span 4 continents.2
In the 17 countries, there is no evidence in all-cause mortality (ACM) by time data of any beneficial effect of COVID-19 vaccines. There is no association in time between COVID-19 vaccination and any proportionate reduction in ACM. The opposite occurs.
…Nine of the 17 countries have no detectable excess ACM in the period of approximately one year after a pandemic was declared on 11 March 2020 by the World Health Organization (WHO), until the vaccines are rolled out (Australia, Malaysia, New Zealand, Paraguay, Philippines, Singapore, Suriname, Thailand, Uruguay).
Unprecedented peaks in ACM occur in the summer (January-February) of 2022 in the Southern Hemisphere, and in equatorial-latitude countries, which are synchronous with or immediately preceded by rapid COVID-19-vaccine-booster-dose rollouts (3rd or 4th doses).
This phenomenon is present in every case with sufficient mortality data (15 countries). Two of the countries studied have insufficient mortality data in January-February 2022 (Argentina and Suriname).
Detailed mortality and vaccination data for Chile and Peru allow resolution by age and by dose number. It is unlikely that the observed peaks in all-cause mortality in January-February 2022 (and additionally in: July-August 2021, Chile; July-August 2022, Peru), in each of both countries and in each elderly age group, could be due to any cause other than the temporally associated rapid COVID-19-vaccine-booster-dose rollouts.
…Synchronicity between the many peaks in ACM (in 17 countries, on 4 continents, in all elderly age groups, at different times) and associated rapid booster rollouts allows this firm conclusion regarding causality, and accurate quantification of COVID-19-vaccine toxicity.
…We quantify the overall all-ages vDFR for the 17 countries to be (0.126 ± 0.004) percent, which would imply 17.0 ± 0.5 million COVID-19 vaccine deaths worldwide, from 13.50 billion injections up to 2 September 2023.
This would correspond to a mass iatrogenic event that killed (0.213 ± 0.006) percent of the world population (1 death per 470 living persons, in less than 3 years), and did not measurably prevent any deaths.
The overall risk of death induced by injection with the COVID-19 vaccines in actual populations, inferred from excess all-cause mortality and its synchronicity with rollouts, is globally pervasive and much larger than reported in clinical trials, adverse effect monitoring, and cause-of-death statistics from death certificates, by three orders of magnitude (1,000-fold greater).
The large age dependence and large values of vDFR quantified in this study of 17 countries on 4 continents, using all the main COVID-19 vaccine types and manufacturers, should induce governments to immediately end the baseless public health policy of prioritizing elderly residents for injection with COVID-19 vaccines, until valid risk-benefit analyses are made.
Confirmed: Australia had NO increase in deaths during the so-called Pandemic
From the body of the text:
Likewise, in the present paper, we show that 9 of the 17 countries studied have no detectable excess ACM until the vaccines are rolled out: Australia, Malaysia, New Zealand, Paraguay, Philippines, Singapore, Suriname, Thailand, and Uruguay.
This is conclusively shown in Figure 2, and corresponding quantifications are given in Table 1 and Figure 3.
This means that, in these 9 countries (Australia, Malaysia, New Zealand, Paraguay, Philippines, Singapore, Suriname, Thailand, Uruguay), for approximately one year after the 11 March 2020 WHO declaration of a pandemic, there were no net extra deaths that could be attributed to a pandemic or to pandemic-response medical or government measures.
These countries had no extra deaths until they were subjected to rapid mass COVID-19 vaccine administration (ed note – both Australia and NZ actually had a decline in excess mortality prior to the introduction of COVID jabs)
There is much more included in this study, and I will honestly say that I have only skimmed it so far – not read it carefully.
But what I have seen provides yet more proof that these jabs are absolute killers.
The conclusion for me is that our governments, medical authorities, and international organisations like the WEF and the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, which have been pushing mandates in opposition to all science, are guilty of democide and premeditated murder.
The time for accountability is coming. It can’t come soon enough for me, however.
This article is freely available at this link.
See more here substack.com
Some bold emphasis added
Please Donate Below To Support Our Ongoing Work To Expose The Lies About Covid 19
PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL, legally registered in the UK as a company incorporated for charitable purposes. Head Office: 27 Old Gloucester Street, London WC1N 3AX.Â
Trackback from your site.
karlito
| #
and it’s not over, people are still dying suddenly from clots, damaged hearts and turbo cancers…
Reply
Wilson Sy
| #
The 180-page report (which most do not know how to read) has not proved many of its conclusions.
Reply
Richard Greene
| #
Total BS not worthy of further comment
Reply