Covid Infection Fatality Rate for under 70s confirmed at 0.1%
If the very elderly had been protected and everyone else had carried on normally, COVID would have been defeated naturally within two months. Who knew?
To 4 decimal places, the age-stratified risk of death IF infected in the first place:
- 0-19 years = ZERO
- 20-29 years = ZERO
- 30-39 years = 0.01 percent
- 40-49 years = 0.04 percent
- 50-59 years = 0.13 percent
- 60-69 years = 0.50 percent
- 0-69 years = 0.10 percent
94 percent of the global population is aged under 70.
These estimates are virtually unchanged from those made in early 2020.
So, yeah, we all knew. But only a few did anything about it.
https://www.linkedin.com/posts/joelsmalley_covid19-redpill-activity-6700870142118641664-PjT_
https://www.linkedin.com/posts/joelsmalley_covid19-coronavirus-activity-6664193891102785536-dKTo
And this is even with the denial of life-saving early treatment.
#CanYouSeeItYet?
See more here substack.com
Header image: Cavernoma Alliance UK
Please Donate Below To Support Our Ongoing Work To Defend The Scientific Method
PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL, legally registered in the UK as a company 
incorporated for charitable purposes. Head Office: 27 Old Gloucester Street, London WC1N 3AX.
Trackback from your site.
Tom
| #
In other words, it just a flu and the severity depends on other bodily health factors.
Reply
Saeed Qureshi
| #
Even this number is not correct.
There is no scientific/experimental evidence showing that the virus exists. Hence, there cannot be COVID-19, so no one can die from it. Sorry!
It is simply false information.
(https://bioanalyticx.com/covid-deaths-as-per-science/).
Reply
Greg Spinolae
| #
WTF is “infection fatality rate”?
Even if there WAS a reliable “test” for the “infection”; which there clearly is NOT, there are no reliable or consistent criteria for what constitutes a connection between this undefined “infection” and any “fatality” that may or may not be coincidental to the result of an unreliable “test” for an undefined agent.
Reply