Covid and the crisis of scientific integrity
MANY of us in the UK who have been writing about the Covid-19 vaccines (and have declined them) have found ourselves fighting what I call ‘data wars’.
Although it is necessary to engage in these wars, in this article I explain why we need an additional tactic to defeat those who are using highly selective scientific data to impose a political will and a ‘new normal’ of social control.
We need to start with the obvious, for which we do not need the nitty-gritty of data, such as this tweet from the editor of TCW Defending Freedom:
As a scientific technical writer, I am very aware that scientific data – and language, terminology, jargon and marketing copywriting – can be used to ‘prove’ almost anything. It is easy to blind people, including scientists, with science.
Much scientific data today is dubious. In our times of huge proliferation of science, the majority of published studies cannot be replicated independently by peers. In other words, published science is not necessarily true. The journal Nature calls this situation a ‘crisis’.
Furthermore, much data that is passed off as science cannot, by its very nature, be replicated and tested, such as so-called behavioural science and data modelling, that we might call crystal-ball science.
Equally concerning is that most scientific experiments fail, and details are hardly ever published, meaning that science does not properly learn from its failures. This is sometimes called ‘publication bias’. Science, of all academic disciplines, is vulnerable to the pressure of ‘publish or perish’. In other words, we must always be cautious of scientists armed with data.
Commerce (not least Big Pharma), government, and the colluding mainstream media can simply pick the scientific data they want to believe or they want the public to believe. At no time has this been more obvious than since early 2020, when large corporations were given political permission and public funding to do ‘warp speed’ science despite, as noted, the knowledge that there was already a crisis of scientific integrity.
Hence we suddenly see the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) ditching its credibility by giving unprecedented licenced approval-to-market of a vaccine still undergoing clinical trials, trials which themselves have been short-cut (such as no blinded control group).
There is much commercial incentive and political pressure now to do novel science, such as novel testing methods and novel vaccines. And there is much disincentive to publish experiments and data on treating Covid-19 with existing treatments. Experts advocating treatments such as ivermectinand asthma inhalers are easily hidden from public view by the mainstream media and by the social media barons.
In the data wars, each side picks its experts. For instance, in the last week of August one could have picked a Japanese report claiming that the Delta variant will acquire complete resistance to the mRNA vaccines, or an Oxford University report telling you that the vaccines are effective against the Delta variant.
Powerful tyrants and sophists in the governments of Canada, USA, Britain, France, Australia, New Zealand, Israel etc, have agreed with the most powerful media on which data are to prevail in the new and internationalist political movement sloganised ‘Build Back Better’.
Politicians know they need the approval of the social media barons, who are internationalist, secularist and woke, convinced that the meaning of life is climate change and utopian science, including, in the words of the UK government, ‘genetic engineering and brain-computer interfaces’.
Israel is one of several highly vaccinated nations – with Iceland, Gibraltar and Seychelles – that, despite initial claims of success, now rank amongst the most diseased nations. Common sense, therefore, informs us that the vaccines don’t work, and have not achieved what the vaccine designers, manufacturers and promoters said they would achieve a year ago (including herd immunity). We do not need sophisticated data to make the point. It is obvious that the situation today in Israel is unexpected, and contrary to what Big Pharma and the world’s political leaders told us to expect. We have the right to start asking whether mass vaccination has caused augmented virulence of the virus in their society.
In the meantime, Israeli scientists, politicians and journalists blindly offer data insisting the vaccines are working. We are told that people simply need to be ‘topped up’ with more of the synthetic spike-protein toxin. According to Israeli PM Naftali Bennett, the double-jabbed are now considered unvaccinated (and denied the Green Pass). Worse, Bennett blames ‘vaccine refusers’ for endangering the whole nation. And as the triple-jabbed Israelis find themselves hospitalised with Covid-19, the plan now is quadruple jabbing.
Denial of the obvious in politics and the media typically begins, ‘We always knew the vaccinations were not 100 per cent effective, but . . .’ Then public figures of science – such as the UK’s Jonathan Van-Tam – make spurious, implausible and wildly inconsistent claims such as that the vaccines have saved 100,000 lives, and 60,000 lives, and 10,000 lives. Even the implausible data are inconsistent!
In many advanced nations, we are now witnessing extreme political and intellectual face-saving. Expect more lies. This lack of truth, honour and honesty in public life is extremely dangerous, as I wrote here for TCW Defending Freedom. Science and medicine have lost their integrity. Health authorities have lost their integrity. Politics has lost its integrity. Trust between doctors and patients has become very fragile.
Over the next few months I expect the UK government and its henchmen at Sage to produce data to prove that we need triple jabs, then quadruple jabs . . .
I suggest that it is time for everyone, regardless of profession and expertise, to challenge all this scientific nonsense with truth and common sense.
Source: www.conservativewoman.co.uk
Please Donate Below To Support Our Ongoing Work To Expose The Lies About COVID19
PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL, legally registered in the UK as a company 
incorporated for charitable purposes. Head Office: 27 Old Gloucester Street, London WC1N 3AX.
Trackback from your site.
richard
| #
take up not going to plan?
The vaccine tracker lists 177,433,000, fully vaccinated. That leaves 152,000,000 unvaccinated. I wonder why they keep saying 80,000,000. And why haven’t the 30,000,000 one vaccine wonders not gotten the second dose. hmmmm?
https://usafacts.org/visual…/covid-vaccine-tracker-states/
Reply
Andrew Pilkington
| #
The Psychopathic Predators are losing, but they still Control way too many Order Followers and Zombies for us to take on atm.
They’re in a state of Panic. Well, they really should be, so we best expect them to lash out harder.
They are making way too many slip-ups but people still obey.
They are after Murdering our Children, now. After all the Psychological Child Abuse, so-called “Trusted” Adults are still putting them through.
So it’s time we talk to our Children and warn them what’s happening, and about these lethal DNA concoctions that are coming their way, and warn them NOT to just go with the flow, with COVID Demands and routines at School.
Nobody, not even our Parents, warned us that we were going to be Vaccinated, back in the 1970’s. We were simply told to leave Class and line up outside the School Nurse’s Office and wait to be called in. 6-Needles and then again a week or so later(? Was a while back 🙂 ), for a Booster, if needed.
Our Children don’t have the luxury of learning slowly anymore. They are in Imminent Danger and I can think of no better way than to help them see Danger Signs.
If we cannot give Informed Consent, then there is no way they can.
And maybe they’ll end up doing a far better job at reaching people than we are?
Great article. Thank you.
Reply
Tubularsock
| #
And excellent article. Thank you.
Appears to Tubularsock that something is amiss when it comes to truth and reality.
Reply
karen elliot
| #
There’s science, and there’s medical science.
The article is about the latter, medical science.
Having been subject to two medical operations, pre-teens – both which were based on ‘the latest science / research’- and neither of which had any positive improvement on the
condition they were meant to relieve, didnt make me doubt science. But medical science,
that’s another matter.
Reply
Denise Mewbourne
| #
Well said, Karen. One could also say “there’s lies, there’s damn lies, and then there’s the medical cartel.”
Reply
troverman
| #
Great, well written article exactly on target. This has nothing to do with conspiracy theory but rather is simple common sense and deductive logic. As the number of unvaccinated individuals dwindles and cases continue to rise, they still claim the problem is those who won’t take the shot. They must take us for fools…
Reply
Charles Schwartz
| #
I must be missing something. Those filling up the hospitals and dying are the unvaccinated, not the people who took the shot. All the bs in the world cannot change that fact.
Reply
Herb Rose
| #
Hi Charles,
The change in bs comes from those defining the terms. First it was that if anyone died from any cause within 28 days of testing (useless PCR test) positive it was a COVID death. Now they say anybody who becomes ill with the diseases within 14 days of receiving the second shot is “unvaccinated”.Look at what is happening in Gilbrata, Isreal, and other fully (over 90%) vaccinated countries. Now Isreal is going to say anyone who doesn’t get a third booster shot is “unvaccinated”. When, in your life, have you ever seen the incidence of a viral disease increasing in July and August? ? What you are missing is a critical evaluation of the evidence.
Herb
Reply
CodexCoder
| #
The larger problem is the quality of the data. VAERS and the yellow card system are both voluntary. So lots of people won’t bother filling out the information. The PCR tests are being abused so lots of false positives, anywhere from 70 to 90% are being counted as cases without the oversight of a proper clinical diagnosis. And then there is the problem of incentives for physicians and hospitals to report COVID counts. The whole thing is so sloppy that you could make anything you want out of the data. Add to this the complete disappearance of the flu in the reports. An endemic illness doesn’t just vanish.
And in the middle of all of this is the political narrative. How many physicians will buck the government that pays their salaries to present an alternate point of view? The list of problems goes on and on.
Reply